Friday marked a big day for environmental progress and hope for our future as a species.Gulliver (nuclear energy) finally began recognizing that the … [Read More...] about Hopeful days for environmental progress in California
CGNP’S Summary Objections to PG&E’s Plan to Close DCPP in 2025
1. PG&E’s current plan to replace DCPP’s annual power production is to expand the four following approaches to maintain its carbon emissions at the current level.
A. Increase the use of solar power.
B. Increase the use of wind power.
C. Increase the use of electric power storage.
D. Increase the use of Demand Reduction.
2. All four of the above approaches require the PG&E expend substantial funds that will ultimately come from ratepayers. None of the above four approaches will allow PG&E to maintain its carbon emissions at the current level after 2025. Currently, PG&E generates about 18 TWh each year from DCPP, California’s largest power generator by far. DCPP generates about five times the annual output of Hoover Dam or about 13 times the annual output of the new Topaz Solar generating facility in eastern San Luis Obispo County.
Topaz covers 9.5 square miles and was built at a cost of about $2.4 billion dollars. Thus, a solar-powered replacement to DCPP would cost approximately $31 billion and cover 123.5 square miles of precious California land. Costs for wind energy to replace DCPP would likely be higher, requiring more land. Solar and wind power levels are subject to harmful random fluctuations. In addition, the solar power is generated in the five hours centered around solar noon. California’s peak power demand period is in the late afternoon.
Thus, solar (or wind) would require an unprecedented amount of energy storage, with storage power losses between 25-50%. The storage requirements are far in excess of the bulk power storage system that PG&E designed for use in conjunction with DCPP, namely Helms Pumped Storage located in the Sierra foothills to the east of Fresno. DCPP pumps water uphill at Helms during the night using DCPP’s surplus power. Then, in the late afternoon, Helms Pumped Storage releases the power equal to one of DCPP’s twin reactors. Thus, Californians in PG&E’s service territory use the equivalent of 3 DCPP reactors of emission-free power in the late afternoon, powering us through the period of peak demand with no brownouts or blackouts.
As a consequence of California’s large projected population growth of more than 14 million new Californians by 2060, relative to the 2010 baseline of 37 million, demand reduction schemes are doomed to failure.
The dirty reality is that PG&E (and the power generating entities that it purchases power from) will increase the combustion of natural gas within California to generate the huge amount of missing power. In addition, increased importation of out-of-state electric power from the burning of dirty coal beyond the ~18 TWh/year now used is likely. These actions will exacerbate global warming. Instead, for the sake of clean air for our children, and for the benefit of our planet, DCPP should encouraged to continue to operate well beyond 2025.
Gene Nelson, Ph.D., Government Liaison
Californians for Green Nuclear Power
San Luis Obispo, California
Friday marked a big day for environmental progress and hope for our future as a species.
Gulliver (nuclear energy) finally began recognizing that the threads holding him down are breakable. The so-far gentle and polite giant has also begun to recognize that the petty aristocrats who have spent so many years wrapping him up in a tangled mess of individually weak bonds — like “the waste issue”, wild predictions about cancers or mutations caused by “radiation,” or the scary-sounding word “proliferation” — have not been acting with good intentions.
The visible event — the March for Environmental Hope — telling me that Gulliver is beginning to find the power of his voice and the strength of his head, arms and legs happened in San Francisco in a variety of venues.
Led by Michael Shellenberger, Kristin Zeitz, and Heather Matteson with celebrity appearances by Richard Rhodes, Robert Stone and Gwyneth Cravens, a happy group of rabble rousing pro-nuclear environmentalists sang songs, wore brightly colored tee shirts, carried signs, chanted slogans, locked arms and marched. They demonstrated at the headquarters of the Sierra Club, Greenpeace and the NRDC.
Not every marcher could be there at every venue, so the group variously expanded and shrank with estimated participant numbers in the range of 40 to 100. As might be imagined, people wearing shirts that said “Split, don’t emit” and carrying signs saying “Save Diablo Canyon,” “Replace Fossil, Not Nuclear,” and “Nuclear For Our Future” captured the attention of many on the streets and mass transit systems of San Francisco.
It is a bit rare — so far — for passionate, happy and environmentally concerned individuals and families to give up personal time to march around proclaiming their support for nuclear energy. It will become less rare in the future.
Some of the participants were so excited about the event’s historical significance that they mistakenly proclaimed that their march might be the first pronuclear demonstration march ever. That’s a bit of an exaggeration. There’s readily available documentation of pronuclear street/sidewalk demonstrations with tee shirts and signs in Vermont and San Luis Obispo, but the March for Environmental Hope was most likely the biggest, loudest, best organized and largest pronuclear environmental demonstration so far.
On Friday evening I spoke with David Walters, a pensioner with a long history of labor activism and environmental demonstrations, on Friday afternoon.
David was pumped up and overflowing with excitement about the event. He told me he “could not believe” how well organized it was. He called Kristin and Heather “treasures for our cause.”
He described how disappointed Michael Shellenberger was that he could not get himself arrested for interfering with people going into or out of the Sierra Club headquarters. There was no one coming and going who could complain and call the police; apparently the Club asked its people to take the day off, knowing that the march was coming.
David told me how much fun it was to sing new songs about the atom to tunes that were familiar from his past activities. David was so excited about telling me the stories of the day that I finally had to interrupt his effusive commentary to tell him I had to hang up because my dinner was ready.
I also received a written “boots on the ground” report to share with you.
Boots on the Ground March Report:
Yesterday we protested the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and the NRDC. At Sierra Club, the guards insisted that they closed the office and no workers were there. A couple Berkeley Nuke Students decided to do a recon mission to check while we were outside chanting “Split Don’t Emit!” and “We’re on a mission, to Stop all Emissions!”. Our suspicions were confirmed-the Sierra Club workers were up on the 13th floor the whole time. We took a vote and decided to force our way in (in probably the most polite way possible — saying we just wanted to sing a song!). We packed two elevators, rode to the top, had one of our intrepid Berkeley agents get the locked door open, and poured into their main office and national headquarters. The conversation? “We’re all lifelong environmentalists. Many of us have given money to your organization. We appreciate much of the good you’ve done, but you’re wrong about one thing and it’s endangering future generations. Nuclear energy. Now we’re going to sing you a song.” The Battle Hymn of the Atom rang throughout their office and after we were done, we left at threats of being trespassed and arrested (we still had to get to Greenpeace and NRDC after all.)
We marched to the train station, chanting the whole way. Chanted on the subway to Greenpeace. Pulitzer Prize winning Author Richard Rhodes met us there, along with Oscar Nominated Robert Stone, Michael Shellenberger, and Author Gwyneth Cravens. Our March had swelled from 40 to 80, with several passersby joining the cause and chanting as loud as anyone. We locked arms in front of the entire building in a show of civil disobedience. Sang again and continued our March to the NRDC. New chants emerged of “NRDC: No Respect for Diablo Canyon” “NRDC:No receiving dirty cash!”. Here Kristin and Heather of the Mothers for Nuclear, Michael Shellenberger, and Jim Becker (former Diablo Plant Manager) spoke. Our final Battle Hymn of the Atom rang throughout the halls and our protest completed with several people blocking the doors in symbolic civil disobedience.
This was the first fight in a war of ideas that must be fought and won for the future of our species. –EGM (Eric G. Meyer)
Bill Gloege, a leader of Californians for Green Nuclear Power, was also there and provided a report. I’ve got a pending request to him for permission to share that report with you; I received a copy from someone else and don’t want to assume it’s okay to share it more widely.
Here are some additional photos of the event.
The march is continuing during the weekend and will climax with a visit to the California Lands Commission meeting in Sacramento on Tuesday, June 28. The marchers want to make sure that the Lands Commission hears their strong support for a full 49 year renewal of the state-owned tidelands under the cooling water infrastructure that connects Diablo Canyon to the world’s largest and most capable heat sink — the Pacific Ocean.
Amory Lovins understands that high quality blogging requires interaction between the author and the people who take time to make comments. He actively engages with readers after he publishes posts on Forbes.com. He even visits here and engages on occasion. I admire that and enjoy the opportunity to spar with a famous person whose views […]
After spending the day scrambling for funds, packing my knapsack, arranging transportation and convincing my wife that I was not “crazy” to believe I should drop everything to head across the country to participate in a four-day march/organizing event with a bunch of rabble-rousing environmentalists, Mother Nature (or God, if you prefer) stepped in to […]
I had originally intended to be occupied and unable to attend the March for Environmental Hope. Things changed. My schedule has opened up. Should I go to San Francisco tomorrow and join in the March? I’m feeling a strong pull, but it’s not an easy or cheap decision to make. I’ve decided to leave it […]
Amory Lovins has once again chosen to publicly display his incredibly creative math skills. This time he is claiming that closing and destroying Diablo Canyon, a well-run and nicely situated nuclear power plant, 20 to 40 years before it has completed its useful life will reduce CO2 emissions and save money. His latest example of […]
This morning I received a press release from the Natural Resources Defense Council bragging about signing a deal with PG&E that — if approved by the California Public Utilities Commission — would result in the plant’s license extension application being withdrawn. Without the extension, California would lose the last nuclear plant operating in the state […]
The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) and the Virginia Nuclear Energy Consortium (VNEC) hosted a half day summit in Richmond on Monday, June 6 for government officials and industry leaders from the fields of research, education, power generation, defense, and security to discuss the role and value of nuclear energy in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The […]
A couple of weeks ago, Exelon announced that it was going to begin taking action to close the Clinton and Quad Cities nuclear power stations. According to the company, those stations have lost a combined total of $800 million during the past seven years. Both facilities are well run and reliable, and their ongoing operating […]
By: Ryan Kinney and Randy Reames The U.S. nuclear industry is in a tough spot right now. The closures of well-operated units, e.g. Vermont Yankee, and the potential closures of several more (e.g. Fort Calhoun, Clinton, Quad Cities) are neither motivating nor good press. While some people may despair that we are doomed because of […]
Rachel Pritzker and Ben Heard, two skilled communicators that have recognized the immense gift to humanity represented by the tightly packed power inside uranium and thorium nuclei, joined me in a terrific discussion about effectively communicating the awesome story of nuclear energy. It should be apparent by now that the US nuclear industry is facing […]
BY: William Rodgers “Why would PG&E decide to destroy Diablo Canyon during its (I would think) period of highest ROI?” Because they can “earn” a higher ROI by switching to natural gas-fueled power plants that are supplemented by federally subsidized wind and solar. The stockholders will earn a guaranteed return on subsidized wind and solar. […]