• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Nuclear plant output in China poised for rapid increases in 2018-2020

July 7, 2018 By Rod Adams 7 Comments

The last two days in June 2018 saw the first power generation from two separate first of a kind nuclear plants in China. Taishan 1, a 1650 MWe European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) was connected to the grid at 5:59 pm local time on June 29, 2018. Less than 24 hours later, at 4:48 pm local time, Sanmen 1, a Westinghouse AP1000 rated at 1117 MWe was connected to the grid and began producing power for the first time.

Both of these milestones were substantially later than originally planned when their initial contracts were signed in November 2007 and September 2007 respectively. All members of the large teams that powered through challenges and contradicted naysayers deserve to feel a sense of accomplishment for a job done well, even if not done as quickly as all would have liked.

When construction began on Sanmen 1 in 2009, it was the world’s first AP1000 to reach that milestone. It is the first unit of a four reactor order for a consortium of Chinese utility companies; all three subsequent units are currently on track to begin commercial operation by the end of 2019. Sanmen 1 received its fuel loading permit on April 25 and began loading fuel on the same day. The second plant in the series, Haiyang 1 started loading fuel on June 21. If it follows the same schedule as the lead unit, it should achieve initial criticality in early August and connect to the grid by the end of August. The other two units are approximately 6 months behind the lead units.

When Taishan 1 construction started in 2009, it was the third EPR, following Okliluto and Flammanville. China General Nuclear Power International (CGN) was less timid than the owners of those two single unit projects; it decided to purchase and construct two units in a series on the same site. Fifty years worth of commercial nuclear plant experience indicates that two unit sites have better overall economics than single unit.

Both by incorporating early lessons from the first two EPR projects and being able to build on more recent nuclear plant construction and oversight experience, Taishan 1 overtook and passed the two EPRs that were started several years earlier to become the world’s first EPR to produce useful power.

When all six reactors are completed and operating, they will add more than 7.7 GWe in nuclear generating capacity to the Chinese grid. If they operate at a capacity factor of 80% they will generate a total of more than 54 billion kilowatt hours of emission-free electricity each year.

There’s still a lot of work to be done and operating experience to gain, but it’s nice to be able to note such important milestones.

Filed Under: AP1000 saga, International nuclear, New Nuclear

Avatar

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AvatarDaddeldu says

    July 7, 2018 at 8:20 AM

    Hi!
    Love to hear that. Why wasn’t that on the news?

    Reply
    • AvatarEngineer-Poet says

      July 7, 2018 at 11:36 PM

      Probably because the media is in the tank for the fossil-fuel interests, and good news about nuclear power is something they don’t want the public to hear.

      Reply
    • AvatarMurray Chapman says

      July 8, 2018 at 8:07 AM

      It made the BBC News (and other news outlets in the UK) because we’re building an EPR Hinkley Point C and have another in plan for Sizewell C. The news coverage was generally positive.

      I’m old enough to remember the “3 day week” where due to electricity shortages caused by a coal miner’s strike and the oil crisis, commercial users were limited to 3 days use per week. We also had candles for the rolling power cuts.

      Energy security is something UK governments of all colours have taken seriously since then.

      Reply
  2. AvatarVille Tulkki says

    July 8, 2018 at 6:34 AM

    Should perhaps be noted that TVO did want to build (and had a permit) for the next plant after Olkiluoto 3 EPR, with EPR being one of the candidates.

    However, with delays in commissioning of OL3, they did not have the cash flow to start OL4 Project and the decision in principle they had expired in 2015.

    Reply
  3. Avatarjohn tucker says

    July 14, 2018 at 2:44 AM

    Wow thats outstanding. Cant believe it wasn’t all over the news.

    Reply
  4. Avatarmitch panek says

    July 20, 2018 at 6:14 PM

    China is only around 1/6th of US’s Nuclear Energy. And 1/3rd of the US per capita electricity usage.

    Reply
    • AvatarBrian says

      September 18, 2018 at 9:55 PM

      Give it time. Especially with China turning them on and the US turing them off.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You have to agree to the comment policy.



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Five Myths about the Lone Star Blackout

Atomic Show #291 – Kalev Kallemets, Fermi Energia

Preliminary lessons available to be learned from Feb 2021 extended cold spell

South Texas Project Unit 1 tripped at 0537 on Feb 15, 2021

Atomic Show #290 – Myrto Tripathi, Voices of Nuclear

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy