4 Comments

  1. Good news on Nuscale’s design certification process getting underway. So the 40 month process (+/- a few) gets started now, but the COL for the first installation site won’t start until 2018? The COL approval process for several of the large reactors has been even longer than the design certification. Is there any reason to believe that the COL process for UAMPS or any other SMR site will be faster? I can easily see a situation where the design gets certified but NuScale is stuck in a holding pattern for several years waiting for site and construction approval? Am I wrong to worry about such a thing happening?

  2. @Tim Wyant

    There is always the possibility that licensing reviews can be delayed. UAMPS has a reasonable chance of taking less time than some of the other COLs because it has selected a site where there should be less local opposition and interference.

    Also, some of the COL delays for projects like Vogtle and Summer were caused by delays in approving design certification amendments.

  3. “There is always the possibility that licensing reviews can be delayed.”

    Not with a little outside the box creative management and a ‘Sroke of the Pen’ decision by Sec of Energy. INL is a DOE site, with much of the same Mission (and oversight) on nuclear as NRC. If the NRC certifies the NuScale design as safe, DOE should tell NRC to MYOB on what we do with OUR site. INL has managed to develop, build, and operate 52 reactors in its history… how many had an NRC COL? DOE has already ‘bought in’ to the NuScale concept by granting them ~$252M development funds.

    From INL’s web page:
    “What is INL?

    INL is part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s complex of national laboratories. The laboratory performs work in each of the strategic goal areas of DOE: energy, national security, science and environment. INL is the nation’s leading center for nuclear energy research and development.”

    INL is a ‘natural’ choice for over sight to see this project to fruition… let a turf battle be solved by ‘whomever’ solves turf battles between departments in the US Government… with the stroke of a pen.

    If NRC certifies the NuScale design as safe, I really don’t see a need for a COL (even legal) and the best plan is to get this thing built and running totally under DOE, on security proofed DOE property!

    Rick Perry are you listening?

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #328 – Matt Loszak, CEO Aalo

    Aalo Atomics is a two year old micro reactor company founded by Matt Loszak, a serial entrepreneur, and Yasir Arafat, a skilled nuclear engineer who previously lead the DOE’s MARVEL advanced micro-reactor demonstration project. Note: At Nucleation Capital, we were impressed enough with the company and the team to add it to our growing portfolio…

  • The Canadians are coming

    Hugh MacDiarmid, the Chairman of the Board for Terrestrial Energy, Inc., gave a talk to the Economic Club of Canada on September 24, 2014. That talk included a brief description of TEI’s integral molten salt reactor technology, but most of the talk was visionary in nature and aimed at exciting his Canadian audience about the…

  • GE-Hitachi and DTE announce additional ESBWR detailed design work

    GE-Hitachi issued a press release on October 5 indicating that they will be working with DTE to determine the resource requirements and schedule for performing the detailed design work necessary to build an ESBWR (Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor) as Fermi Unit 3. Though DTE has not announced a decision to build the facility, it…

  • Update – DOE Loan Guarantee for Vogtle

    Update: (Feb 19. 2014 4:38 pm) – Here is the press release that DOE posted after Dr. Moniz’s talk at the National Press Club. Sec. Moniz to Georgia, Energy Department Scheduled to Close on Loan Guarantees to Construct New Nuclear Power Plant Reactors Note: The press release mentioned above is no longer accessible on the…

  • IRA’s Clean Electricity Tax Credits (Sections 48E and 45Y) are an under-appreciated boon for new nuclear power

    The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) should make an important contribution towards mitigating future inflationary periods. It accomplishes this beneficial goal by providing important support for facilities that increase US clean electricity production. The key sections of the Inflation Reduction Act are new IRS code sections 45Y and 48E. Respectively, these are called the Clean Electricity…

  • NGNP aims to expand nuclear fission out of its electricity producing niche (box)

    The NGNP Alliance recently published a thought provoking blog titled Energy Vs. Electricity and Why We Care that clearly explains the basis for their interest in using high temperature gas cooled reactors. That group of far-sighted organizations was formed in recognition that the energy market is far larger than just producing electricity. They believe that…