10 Comments

  1. “He believes it is insane to have a system where just 17% of the teachers in the state can afford to buy a house near their schools. ” And just yesterday I read that San Francisco is seriously considering building “Dormitories” for the silicon valley Technical workers to ease the home prices for SF hotel and restaurant workers. Looks like Orwell’s 1984 has finally arrived.

  2. gifts of a a “dynamic, diverse, progressive population”

    LOL you should write for the NY Times.

    Time for California to split into multiple states. Most of the state is predominantly conservative outside LA and San Francisco. Maybe we can carve out Diablo Canyon into one of those. Leave the others to bask in their dynamic, diverse, progressive, and homeless (due to failed policies and commitment to keeping a permanent underclass) population.

  3. I hope I am able to sell my house and get the hell out of CA before he gets his hands on Prop. 13.

    This state is going to have to undergo a hard failure before there is any chance of sanity being restored. Between the coming public employee pension bailouts, Brown’s bullet train to nowhere and the red carpet for illegal aliens from the third world, it won’t be long.

  4. FermiAged, I couldn’t agree more. One has to wonder if those in charge are deliberately attempting to sabotage the state…and country.

  5. The same self-destructive policies are pursued in numerous western nations regardless of the political party in power. The policies are characterized by hostility towards western values such as free speech, logic and personal indepedence (particularly through restrictions on energy development). This is no accident.

  6. Michael running is an opportunity whether he wins or loses because he will be advocating for nuclear energy. I think the rest of us supporters of nuclear need to donate to Michael to help get him more into the spotlight. For example to help him join the debates. He will be promoting the same values we want for the whole country. Any success he has will have positive effect outside the state as well. Even outside the country.

  7. He’d be even more courageous if he campaigned for the scarcity value of all resources supplied for free by nature/God to be collected and paid as a citizens dividend.

    Not only would this rebate in full to producers, like teachers, that part of expenditure on immovable property that currently makes it unaffordable, but would also allow the market to optimally allocate existing and future developments.

    Resulting in affordable housing, compact, attractive cities and more space at the margin left for wildlife.

    But Rome wasn’t built in a day, and I suppose repealing Prop 13 is about as good as we can expect from a politician.

  8. I will be voting for M. Shellenberger in June. I do not expect him to win.

    It would be great if he can make the other candidates speak honestly about the current energy policy in the state.

    I do find it odd that even the folks at the Rocky Mountain Institute note that the military will be using nuclear to power their ships. But it’s to expensive for the rest of us. Only if you don’t count it’s co2 free output like we (CA) count it for RE!

    It would be great if folks would leave a few comments over at this post by Kunstler- http://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-302-yakking-chris-nelder-energy-transition/

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic fission technology is a terrible candidate for a “do not resuscitate” order. Antinuclear groups MUST not be granted right to put one in place

    I’m going to beg forgiveness and literary license for the following extended, potentially inappropriate, and perhaps too personal metaphor. For several weeks, I’ve been struggling with finding my “voice” in dealing with current events related to the U.S. electricity production system. As part of my healing process, I went on a several day long reading…

  • Hydrocarbon marketers had a motive to oppose nuclear energy growth

    Why have the efforts to restrict nuclear energy development been so well supported for so many years? My theory is that hydrocarbon marketers have had a strong financial motive for supporting any group that seeks to reduce the supply of energy. Even when those groups seem to be fighting against the hydrocarbon industry, they are…

  • Exelon’s Chris Crane blames lawmakers for his plant closure announcements

    A few minutes ago, Exelon employees received an email from Chris Crane, the company CEO, announcing the company’s decision to permanently close three nuclear reactors that each produce 7-8 billion kilowatt hours of electricity each year without dumping a molecule of CO2 into the atmosphere. Even though the company reported 2015 after-tax earnings of approximately…

  • FOE continues promoting fossil fuel by trying to force Diablo Canyon closure

    As a literature major during my undergraduate years, I was fascinated by the variety of stories that can be told about the same topic depending on the author’s selected point of view. Here is a brief example. Friends of the Earth (FOE) has a page on its web site titled Shutting down Diablo Canyon. The…

  • Pandora’s Promise Review Roundup

    Robert Stone’s Pandora’s Promise has been capturing attention and encouraging people to challenge their personal beliefs and tribal assumptions. Stone’s documentary is a classic “journey of discovery” tale featuring five people who changed their minds about nuclear energy from opposition to support. It takes viewers along the path of knowledge discovery followed by Gwyneth Cravens,…