Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 Comments

  1. 3/11 is the ‘New 9/11″, the Nuclear Cheerleaders are The New Chickenhaw­ks.
    “Never serving in a NUCLEAR CRISIS like Daiichi Japan.
    Quoting you Rod
    “Ostrich response. Simple steps reduce radiation doses – Time, Distance, Shielding. Only needed in HIGH dose rate areas”
    What about the people of Japan!? Have you no compassion, no SHAME!?!?
    EVACUATE THE CHILDREN @ the very least! You are one sick puppy sitting where you are FAR AWAY from the crisis. SHAME ON YOU!

  2. On topic comments, with no profanity are always welcome. Personal attacks must be aboided, though I am a little more lenient when the attacks are directed at me. I have a thick skin.

    There is an annoying delay before comments become visible. We have tried hard to find the problem without success. Regular visitors are getting used to the delay.

    One more thing – comments with more than one link have to be moderated to protect against spammers.

  3. Whoopie,

    Read the news and look at some pictures. 2 weeks after the industrial accident at Fukushima, IAEA workers wearing nothing short of thin plastic gears were there to observe. About 40 of them.

    Of course, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s sole mission is to do harm to their full time employees and send them in dangerous areas.

    We won’t mention the fact that 2 months after the event, the IAEA stopped reporting on the subject. Nothing much to add they thought.

  4. Rod,

    Delays are one thing. However, I do not get all the comments after subscribing to a story. This feature does not work well either.

    Ciao

  5. What are you talking about? It’s right there at the end of the list – in a place of honor and notice. 🙂

    (Sorry, Will. I’ll do better next time.)

  6. Rod, I am not a subscriber yet until I see an objective debate on why we cannot focus on the true victims (children forced to be expose to radiation that has never been allowed for artificial radiation (man made)). The task at hand is to get these people out of there. 5 to 10 years we will see these people in Tohoku/Kanto with increased cancer rates because the Japanese government is doing exactly what it did during WWII. There is a huge difference between ordering people to war and those that have to experience. If you want true insight, I will be happy to discuss it. Seeing all of this on a daily basis has taken its toll on me. What I do not appreciate is bloggers that decided from the onset that there are no plumes. If we cannot help the Japanese nuclear power is out of the question.

  7. @Rooks

    One of the many reasons that I am involved in the battle royale over energy supply choices is that I love children and want to do everything I can to protect them.

    The best science I know says that there is nothing hazardous about the low levels of radiation that remain in the evacuated areas outside of the power plant fence. The UNSCEAR report of the effects of Chernobyl tells me that nearly all of the very real negative effects of that accident came about as a result of irrational fear of radiation and irrational government ordered responses to alleviate that fear.

    If your time is limited, please at least go and read the summary page. If you have more time, read some of the detailed reports that are linked there.

    http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/chernobyl.html

    Here are the final words of the summary:

    “Although those exposed as children and the emergency and recovery workers are at increased risk of radiation-induced effects, the vast majority of the population need not live in fear of serious health consequences due to the radiation from the Chernobyl accident. For the most part, they were exposed to radiation levels comparable to or a few times higher than annual levels of natural background, and future exposures continue to slowly diminish as the radionuclides decay. Lives have been seriously disrupted by the Chernobyl accident, but from the radiological point of view, generally positive prospects for the future health of most individuals should prevail.”

    If you really are in the thick of things, please consider the fact that reducing stress caused by fear of something that is not harmful might be the most positive contribution that you can make.

Similar Posts

  • Gas Interests Opposing U.S. Nuke Industry’s State-by-State Strategy

    The nuclear industry’s strategy of working in individual U.S. states to obtain support for financially stressed plants has stalled. Despite successfully implemented efforts in New York and Illinois to provide assistance that is narrowly targeted at a handful of especially vulnerable units, no other state has been able to get a support measure out of…

  • Accurate nuclear and radiation health information is sorely needed

    As I was reading about the organized protests against nuclear energy project development in India, I noted the following passage. It provides evidence for the importance of working hard to spread accurate information about nuclear energy and the health effects of radiation. Sunthari Pentan sat near the church in a black sari and gold-colored necklace,…

  • Fission Fast! – New Slogan Idea For Effective Energy Revolution

    Fission, FAST! My creative juices were inspired this morning by an article titled Climate is not a mass movement. The piece comes from Randy Olson, the filmmaker turned scientist who is most famous among my pro-nuclear communication friends as the author of Don’t Be Such a Scientist. Aside: I wonder how many of the people…

  • JFK’s “Best of the Above” speech at Hanford, WA on September 26, 1963

    Almost exactly 50 years ago today, President John F. Kennedy, Jr. visited Hanford, Washington to give a speech about the importance of electrical power and the role that he expected nuclear technology would play in the future. (HT to the TriCity Herald for posting the video provided by the Department of Energy and to Martin…

  • Nuclear advocacy opportunity in Vermont – November 30

    This is a Public Service Announcement. November 30 Film and Panel at the Gund Institute The Energy Education Project of the Ethan Allen Institute has two members of our Board of Advisors on the panel at an event sponsored by the Gund Institute at University of Vermont (UVM). The film and panel start at 4…

  • Atomic Show #304 – Len Rodberg, Nuclear New York

    Dr. Leonard Rodberg spent most of his adult life being opposed to nuclear energy. A half a dozen years ago, he abruptly changed his mind. Ever since, he has been a strong and vocal advocate for the increased use of nuclear energy. On Atomic Show #304 Len and I discuss his education, career, his changing…