5 Comments

  1. Really neat idea but the cost is prohibitive. The information from the website links to a paper written in 2011. The cost estimate in 2011 was $99.7 million for 2 10MWth units or $122.5 million for a single 20MWth unit. As we can see from the the VCS and Vogtle units, you can probably double the cost estimate since 2011 for the micro-units too. Now we are looking at the realistic price range of about $200 million for 8MWe output. $200 million can buy one heck of a diesel generator and a lot of fuel for a small community. It all comes down to cost.

  2. I wish them well.
    The thought of a helium primary and nitrogen secondary is very intriguing.
    I wonder if it could pair an Ultra High Temperature Reactor with an Adams Engine . . .

  3. Fist-of-a-kind carries a rather steep premium.
    I wonder what the cost would be for the 50th one.

  4. Any design that requires a gas-gas heat exchanger and on site fuel handling will always have significant costs, but I don’t think that you need to double the price based on recent experience in the US. The cost estimates were based on other first of a kind reactors, and the technology involved is much easier to manufacture than the giant components needed for a big LWR. It’s quite possible that with a friendly regulatory environment, good project managers and high volume manufacturing that this could be cheaper than diesel in remote communities, and if you get volumes large enough then clusters of a few dozen reactors derived from this technology might even find a place on conventional grids.

    That being said, I think that this particular design will always be expensive compared to simpler designs, but the extremely high safety factors and small size do make it interesting. If anyone is interested the 2011 paper is available at https://www.u-battery.com/_/uploads/AExecSummary.pdf and some additional technical details are available at https://www.u-battery.com/media.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • South Australian senator believes there’s value in “nuclear waste”

    South Australian Sen. Sean Edwards sees economic opportunity for his state by taking advantage of other countries’ irrational fear of radioactive materials. He wants to turn what some call “waste” into wealth. He and his staff recognize that there are tens of billions of dollars set aside in government budgets around the world for safe…

  • Prospective customers lining up at NuScale

    A few days ago, Dan Yurman at Neutron Bytes published a blog post that is now titled Flash: NuScale executive says firm may build SMRs at Idaho lab. It was a follow-up to an earlier post in which Dan speculated about the Idaho National Lab’s potential as a good site for a new nuclear power…

  • Rosatom achieves a marketing win in Finland to supply Fennovoima

    Finns are pragmatic people who love their country, but also recognize its geographic limitations. “Finland is a very cold and dark country. Electricity is very important to us. We are a kind of island in Europe, we have take care of ourselves. No one will help us if we run out of power.” Way back…

  • Westinghouse’s Roderick shifts resources from SMR to AP1000

    NuScale was the sole winner in the latest round under the DOE’s Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for small modular reactors (SMR). The DOE announced its decision in December 2013. As a result of that decision, Westinghouse has shifted internal resources from working on a 225 MWe SMR to focus more on continued refinements and completion…

  • Potential for Korea, Japan, U.S. to Collaborate on Pyroprocessing Under Trump

    South Korea (ROK), Japan and the United States all have large nuclear energy programs that are facing a variety of challenges limiting their growth, namely opposition by the nonproliferation industry to wider deployment of enrichment and recycling technologies. There is interest and opportunity to collaborate in developing solutions in areas where challenges overlap. The Global…