5 Comments

  1. Really neat idea but the cost is prohibitive. The information from the website links to a paper written in 2011. The cost estimate in 2011 was $99.7 million for 2 10MWth units or $122.5 million for a single 20MWth unit. As we can see from the the VCS and Vogtle units, you can probably double the cost estimate since 2011 for the micro-units too. Now we are looking at the realistic price range of about $200 million for 8MWe output. $200 million can buy one heck of a diesel generator and a lot of fuel for a small community. It all comes down to cost.

  2. I wish them well.
    The thought of a helium primary and nitrogen secondary is very intriguing.
    I wonder if it could pair an Ultra High Temperature Reactor with an Adams Engine . . .

  3. Fist-of-a-kind carries a rather steep premium.
    I wonder what the cost would be for the 50th one.

  4. Any design that requires a gas-gas heat exchanger and on site fuel handling will always have significant costs, but I don’t think that you need to double the price based on recent experience in the US. The cost estimates were based on other first of a kind reactors, and the technology involved is much easier to manufacture than the giant components needed for a big LWR. It’s quite possible that with a friendly regulatory environment, good project managers and high volume manufacturing that this could be cheaper than diesel in remote communities, and if you get volumes large enough then clusters of a few dozen reactors derived from this technology might even find a place on conventional grids.

    That being said, I think that this particular design will always be expensive compared to simpler designs, but the extremely high safety factors and small size do make it interesting. If anyone is interested the 2011 paper is available at https://www.u-battery.com/_/uploads/AExecSummary.pdf and some additional technical details are available at https://www.u-battery.com/media.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • B&W’s mPowerTM Reactor – Who Says America is Behind in the Nuclear Renaissance?

    Sometimes, games really do change while few people are watching. That is what happened yesterday when Babcock and Wilcox announced their mPowerTM modular nuclear power plant. The big difference is not the basic technology – after all, the mPower reactor is a pressurized water reactor using the same kind of coolant, the same kind of…

  • House Energy and Commerce seeks to enable advanced nuclear energy

    On Friday, April 29, 2016, the Energy and Power subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing to discuss H.R. 4979 and a draft discussion bill with the unfortunate acronym of NUKEPA (Nuclear Utilization of Keynote Energy Policies Act). Though at different stages of the legislative process, both documents are efforts to…

  • B&W mPower™ Reactor Control Room Simulator Begins Operations

    (CHARLOTTE, N.C. – December 4, 2012) – The Babcock & Wilcox Company (B&W) (NYSE: BWC) is pleased to announce that the production-standard control room prototype for its B&W mPower™ small modular reactor (SMR) is now operational. This engineering simulator is a key milestone in the B&W mPower development program. The B&W mPower control room prototype,…

  • U. S. should strengthen and export its atomic energy capabilities

    Donald Trump has once again caused a huge stir with the issuance of a 140 character statement of purpose. Here is the tweet heard around the world: The United States must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)…