12 Comments

  1. It’s excellent and to the point, and if I remember, it’s one of the marketing themes we discussed here…which is great.
    It gets the message out – that nuclear really is the backbone of the grid. Coal only has a 71% capacity factor? This is interesting. Well, with coal, I suppose that heat units *do* come with an invoice payable Net 10 (your friendly coal train), so it makes sense *not* to produce sometimes…

  2. This is why when replacing coal with nuclear (coal2nuclear.com) on a MW per MW basis, you increase total capacity by 10 to 30% depending on the age of the coal burner. Another plus for phasing out coal in favor of nuclear.

  3. It even looks “clean”. Question: Where will this ad be placed? Depending on that, the axiom: “Less is More” often applies. From a visual impact perspective, I like the graph as it gives substance to mere numbers. I also like the “take action” step with the online quiz — maybe enlarge that some?
    Think of how many times you receive a business card where the phone number, email address or other contact information is in too small a font. Makes the card nearly worthless. Anyone over 40 years old is dealing with declining near visual acuity without “helpers” and that cohort is expanding daily.

  4. This is semi-off topic, but it’s for Amory Lovins and his argument about private equity being all over investing in traditional renewables and “not touching nuclear with a 10-foot pole”.
    I saw earlier today that the Brightsource Energy Ivanpah Project was recently awarded $1.37 Billion in loan guarantees. This project involves building a 400 (maybe 440) MW solar thermal power plant.
    http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/images/uploads/press_releases/BSE_Press_Release_DOE_Announcement_2_22_10_FINAL-2.pdf
    Using the capacity factors/”operating efficiencies” from this NEI ad, a conservative estimate that the new Vogtle Units will only have a capacity of 1200 MW (because I’m too lazy to look up the actual number right now), and conservatively pinning Ivanpah’s capacity as 440 MW, the $ of loan guarantees/average expected electricity generated for each project is as follows:
    Vogtle – $8.3 Billion / (2 x 1200 MW x 0.92) = $3,760/kW
    Ivanpah – $1.37 Billion / (1 x 440 MW x 0.21) = $7,410/kW
    That’s right around double for Ivanpah.

  5. Glad that they are including the capacity factor in this, but this is not nearly enough. All the time there are announcements of a, say “500 MW solar farm in California”. No it’s not !!! It’s a 100 MW farm, at best. Once the public understands capacity factor more, there will be even more support for nuclear.

  6. Let’s hope this ad is widely disseminated–beyond the Beltway.
    I am told that there are ads for nuclear power, but the only one I have ever seen was an enigmatic, stylish animation by Areva that I don’t think anyone would understand unless they already were educated about how nuclear power works. Rocks go into a place and then people are dancing under lights to “Funky Town”. Meanwhile the fossil fuel companies have ads full of wind turbines and attractive youthful people in hardhats who are serving the nation. Why not show nuclear plant workers who talk about how they and their kids live within a few miles of the plant?

  7. How about a catchy music video starring a few dozen pop stars singing “We save the world… We are the neutrons…”

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Will Ontario look away from CANDU?

    In recent months there has been a growing awareness that Ontario, Canada needs new power sources, both to supply a growing demands and to replace old, coal-fired power plants. The provincial government has committed to retiring the coal plants because of their contributions to global climate change, acid rain, and other environmental problems. Nuclear power…

  • Is a Federal Grant Really Income? (Wow, I Never Knew That – Sarcasm)

    Here is an interesting lede from a story in RenewablesBiz.com titled Non-conformity Taxing Developers: Ask any renewable energy project developer what saved the market from total collapse in 2009 and the unanimous answer would be the cash grants program from the U.S. Treasury. That’s the Section 1603 program changes in the Recovery Act in which…

  • Energy Solutions of Utah – fast growing provider of nuclear services

    The US nuclear industry landscape is changing into something far more dynamic as more people and organizations realize the value of assets and knowledge focused on clean, safe, abundant nuclear energy. I recently learned about Energy Solutions a company that was formed in 2006 by merging together a number of existing companies in the business…

  • The Times updates the status of the PBMR project

    On 12 November 2005, Angela Jameson published a story in The Times titled South Africa banks on new family of nuclear reactors. An interesting aspect of the story is that it begins with a description of the electrical power situation that exists for 40% of the population of that country – they have none. When…

  • Confronting a Misguided Curriculum With Facts, Measurements, and Photos

    My friend Suzy Hobbs over at PopAtomic Studios has posted an important story of personal discovery and patient teaching in a blog titled The Beginning of My Nuclear Education. In her high school biology class, she was taught that nuclear energy and radiation was something to be terribly worried about. She went home and confronted…

  • FEPC Information Sheet for Fukushima Daiichi on March 16 2011

    Update to Information Sheet Regarding the Tohoku Earthquake The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (FEPC) Washington DC OfficeAs of 10:15AM (EST), March 16, 2011Highest Radiation Levels At 6:40AM (JST) on March 16, a radiation level of 400 milli sievert per hour was recorded outside the west side of the secondary containment building of…