12 Comments

  1. It’s excellent and to the point, and if I remember, it’s one of the marketing themes we discussed here…which is great.
    It gets the message out – that nuclear really is the backbone of the grid. Coal only has a 71% capacity factor? This is interesting. Well, with coal, I suppose that heat units *do* come with an invoice payable Net 10 (your friendly coal train), so it makes sense *not* to produce sometimes…

  2. This is why when replacing coal with nuclear (coal2nuclear.com) on a MW per MW basis, you increase total capacity by 10 to 30% depending on the age of the coal burner. Another plus for phasing out coal in favor of nuclear.

  3. It even looks “clean”. Question: Where will this ad be placed? Depending on that, the axiom: “Less is More” often applies. From a visual impact perspective, I like the graph as it gives substance to mere numbers. I also like the “take action” step with the online quiz — maybe enlarge that some?
    Think of how many times you receive a business card where the phone number, email address or other contact information is in too small a font. Makes the card nearly worthless. Anyone over 40 years old is dealing with declining near visual acuity without “helpers” and that cohort is expanding daily.

  4. This is semi-off topic, but it’s for Amory Lovins and his argument about private equity being all over investing in traditional renewables and “not touching nuclear with a 10-foot pole”.
    I saw earlier today that the Brightsource Energy Ivanpah Project was recently awarded $1.37 Billion in loan guarantees. This project involves building a 400 (maybe 440) MW solar thermal power plant.
    http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/images/uploads/press_releases/BSE_Press_Release_DOE_Announcement_2_22_10_FINAL-2.pdf
    Using the capacity factors/”operating efficiencies” from this NEI ad, a conservative estimate that the new Vogtle Units will only have a capacity of 1200 MW (because I’m too lazy to look up the actual number right now), and conservatively pinning Ivanpah’s capacity as 440 MW, the $ of loan guarantees/average expected electricity generated for each project is as follows:
    Vogtle – $8.3 Billion / (2 x 1200 MW x 0.92) = $3,760/kW
    Ivanpah – $1.37 Billion / (1 x 440 MW x 0.21) = $7,410/kW
    That’s right around double for Ivanpah.

  5. Glad that they are including the capacity factor in this, but this is not nearly enough. All the time there are announcements of a, say “500 MW solar farm in California”. No it’s not !!! It’s a 100 MW farm, at best. Once the public understands capacity factor more, there will be even more support for nuclear.

  6. Let’s hope this ad is widely disseminated–beyond the Beltway.
    I am told that there are ads for nuclear power, but the only one I have ever seen was an enigmatic, stylish animation by Areva that I don’t think anyone would understand unless they already were educated about how nuclear power works. Rocks go into a place and then people are dancing under lights to “Funky Town”. Meanwhile the fossil fuel companies have ads full of wind turbines and attractive youthful people in hardhats who are serving the nation. Why not show nuclear plant workers who talk about how they and their kids live within a few miles of the plant?

  7. How about a catchy music video starring a few dozen pop stars singing “We save the world… We are the neutrons…”

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Heritage Foundation comments on 2009 Energy Budget

    The Heritage Foundation published a blog titled Less Is More for Energy In Bush’s Budget on February 4, 2008. The entry talks about the budget items submitted by the Administration for energy in 2009. Heritage likes the idea of spending large sums of money on Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) and likes the fact that…

  • Wall Street's Nuclear Caution

    The July 10, 2006 issue of BusinessWeek includes a commentary titled Nuclear Power’s Missing Fuel: Why Wall Street is skeptical of backing a new round of proposed nuke plants. As the column points out, there is a great deal of froth in the alternative energy technology market. Headline articles talking about ethanol, biodiesel, solar and…

  • Unions leading the way for new nuclear power in Scotland

    The web site titled This is North Scotland published a short article about a recent Labor Party resolution favoring the construction of new nuclear power plants. The article stated that the engineering union Amicus and the National Union of Mineworkers support the notion that nuclear power must be included as part of a balanced energy…

  • Decommissioning Oyster Creek would hurt Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey

    I wrote a letter to the author of a 16 February 2006 article from the Asbury Park Press titled “Closing Oyster Creek would be anything but simple.” The article told its story mainly from the point of view of people that were fighting the license renewal process and talked about things like stopping the production…

  • Adsense insertions of anti-nuclear advertisements

    Several readers over the past few months have written to me to let me know that anti-nuclear advertisements often appear on my blog and on the Atomic Insights web site. Those ads are placed based on the context of the post or article by the Google Adsense service, which allows people and organizations to purchase…

  • US pressure in UN to draft a resolution calling for sanctions on Iran

    Reuters South Africa published a story on September 8, 2006 titled US looks for quick Iran sanctions resolution. According to the story, U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns stated that the US will seek action in the Security Council to draft a resolution setting sanctions against Iran for its defense of its right to build…