12 Comments

  1. It’s excellent and to the point, and if I remember, it’s one of the marketing themes we discussed here…which is great.
    It gets the message out – that nuclear really is the backbone of the grid. Coal only has a 71% capacity factor? This is interesting. Well, with coal, I suppose that heat units *do* come with an invoice payable Net 10 (your friendly coal train), so it makes sense *not* to produce sometimes…

  2. This is why when replacing coal with nuclear (coal2nuclear.com) on a MW per MW basis, you increase total capacity by 10 to 30% depending on the age of the coal burner. Another plus for phasing out coal in favor of nuclear.

  3. It even looks “clean”. Question: Where will this ad be placed? Depending on that, the axiom: “Less is More” often applies. From a visual impact perspective, I like the graph as it gives substance to mere numbers. I also like the “take action” step with the online quiz — maybe enlarge that some?
    Think of how many times you receive a business card where the phone number, email address or other contact information is in too small a font. Makes the card nearly worthless. Anyone over 40 years old is dealing with declining near visual acuity without “helpers” and that cohort is expanding daily.

  4. This is semi-off topic, but it’s for Amory Lovins and his argument about private equity being all over investing in traditional renewables and “not touching nuclear with a 10-foot pole”.
    I saw earlier today that the Brightsource Energy Ivanpah Project was recently awarded $1.37 Billion in loan guarantees. This project involves building a 400 (maybe 440) MW solar thermal power plant.
    http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/images/uploads/press_releases/BSE_Press_Release_DOE_Announcement_2_22_10_FINAL-2.pdf
    Using the capacity factors/”operating efficiencies” from this NEI ad, a conservative estimate that the new Vogtle Units will only have a capacity of 1200 MW (because I’m too lazy to look up the actual number right now), and conservatively pinning Ivanpah’s capacity as 440 MW, the $ of loan guarantees/average expected electricity generated for each project is as follows:
    Vogtle – $8.3 Billion / (2 x 1200 MW x 0.92) = $3,760/kW
    Ivanpah – $1.37 Billion / (1 x 440 MW x 0.21) = $7,410/kW
    That’s right around double for Ivanpah.

  5. Glad that they are including the capacity factor in this, but this is not nearly enough. All the time there are announcements of a, say “500 MW solar farm in California”. No it’s not !!! It’s a 100 MW farm, at best. Once the public understands capacity factor more, there will be even more support for nuclear.

  6. Let’s hope this ad is widely disseminated–beyond the Beltway.
    I am told that there are ads for nuclear power, but the only one I have ever seen was an enigmatic, stylish animation by Areva that I don’t think anyone would understand unless they already were educated about how nuclear power works. Rocks go into a place and then people are dancing under lights to “Funky Town”. Meanwhile the fossil fuel companies have ads full of wind turbines and attractive youthful people in hardhats who are serving the nation. Why not show nuclear plant workers who talk about how they and their kids live within a few miles of the plant?

  7. How about a catchy music video starring a few dozen pop stars singing “We save the world… We are the neutrons…”

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • BusinessWeek cannot be serious!

    In the December 12, 2005 issue of BusinessWeek magazine, there is a “Special Report” titled Business gets serious about emissions. The article talks about a number of initiatives, actions, technologies, policies, and regulations related to the issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the face of almost certain cost increases attributed to global climate change….

  • FPL seeking PSC "determination of need"

    As Atomic Insights readers may remember, I have a lifelong association with FPL (Florida Power and Light). My Dad worked as an engineer for the company for 35 years – starting well before I was born. Dad passed away just one month after he retired, so it is almost completely accurate to say that the…

  • Four companies in bidding for Westinghouse

    Four companies, two with headquarters in the United States – General Electric and Shaw Group – and two with their headquarters in Japan – Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Toshiba – are viewed as the front runners in the growing bidding war for Westinghouse. Westinghouse is a wholly owned subsidiary of BNFL, an integrated nuclear plant…

  • Today, December 18, 2007, we celebrate 50 years of commercial nuclear power

    At 12:30 am on December 18, 1957, the operators of the Shippingport Atomic Power Station synchronized the rotation of the alternating current being produced by the plant’s single steam turbine generator with the electricity already being supplied by the local grid and closed the output breaker. For the next few hours, the operators quietly increased…

  • South Africa's interest in commercial uranium enrichment

    South Africa is ready to join the increasingly competitive commercial uranium enrichment industry. Like several other countries that are already in the uranium mining business, leaders in South Africa are considering expanding into more lucrative phases of the nuclear fuel supply chain including enrichment and fuel element fabrication. Note: If you want to learn more…

  • Decarbonization and Nuclear Power – Webinar on The Energy Collective

    Dan Yurman who writes for Idaho Samizdat, Fuel Cycle Week and The Energy Collective shared a link with me to a very interesting hour long discussion on the topic of Nuclear Power and Decarbonization. Dan’s fellow panel members included E. Ashton Poole, Managing Director Global Power and Utility Group, Morgan Stanley and Jerry Paul, CEO,…