17 Comments

  1. I’m curious. Considering Kristine Svinicki’s reappointment, has she done anything in the last few years that has substantively advanced the interests of the NE industry?

  2. @Jon Hall

    Yes. She took many actions that had the effect of making Jaczko less effective in his mission to eliminate nuclear energy.

    She gutted it out through some tough times on the Commission and served as a knowledgeable voice of reason. She played an under-appreciated role in the successful effort to push Jaczko out.

    She’s also a good speaker; her talks at the annual Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) have been my favorite part of the event.

    She is, and will continue to be, and effective Chair.

  3. Wow, thats a suprise, considering Trump’s fondness for hiring incompetent hacks and unqualified family members. Pruitt and Kushner musta been kept out of this decision.

  4. Hate Trump rhetoric really isn’t very helpful. Some good things are happening, such as grassroots support for NE, actions at the state level to keep existing plants open, more people speaking out in favor of NE in the popular media and challenging those who don’t, etc. News of those things is much more encouraging than Hate-Trump-All-The-Time spew.

    Is this the same David Wright who is a highly-placed member of the UCS? Some of what he has written of spent fuel pool storage worries me.

  5. Hate? Why is it that honest appraisals of the Trump administration are often countered with unsubstantive prattle? Does he lie? Does he hire family members that have no qualifications for the positions they are given? And to deny incompetence on the part of many of his staff is to deny reality. It ain’t hatred, Wayne, its just honest observation. Hatred is the spew I often see here against the left, and occassionally see expressed here towards minorities by the resident eugenics advocate.

  6. Kristine Svinicki’s tenure on the Commission can be described by one word: competent.

    That this one word is so relevant (and unusual) in modern times is only a testament to how broken things have been for the last decade or so.

    Svinicki has been a fine Commissioner. I expect that she will continue to be a fine Chairman.

    Sorry, Jon, but your trolling is falling flat.

  7. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/climate/trump-budget-energy.html?_r=0&referer=https://www.google.com/

    “The budget would significantly scale back public financing for federal energy research. The Energy Department focuses on the next generation of energy technologies — from advanced nuclear reactors to algae biofuels — conducting basic research in its network of 17 national laboratories, and aiding private companies struggling to bring risky new technologies to market. Yet Mr. Trump’s proposal envisions sweeping cuts that would neuter most of the agency’s critical energy programs.

    The agency’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, which has helped nudge down the cost of solar power, faces a 69 percent cut. The Office of Fossil Energy, which invests in methods for capturing carbon dioxide from coal plants and burying it underground, faces a 54 percent cut. The Office of Nuclear Energy, which is pursuing technology to help extend the life of the United States’ existing nuclear reactors, faces a 31 percent cut”

  8. Its a direct quote. Forgot the quotation marks.

    Nothing to add. ‘Cept maybe, kiss science and technological advancement goodbye, for at least 4 years. Unless we wise up and tar and feather this clown show out of Washington DC.

  9. Calm down. He isn’t even halfway into his first year yet. Give him some time. That’s what you’re supposed to do for every new president.

  10. Congress will determine the budget. Several congesscritters have already stated that the proposed budget is DOA.

  11. @David B. Benson

    If Congress gets around to actually passing a real budget and does not rely on a continuing resolution and omnibus spending bills, perhaps you’ll be correct.

    Unfortunately, even a proposed Presidential budget has very real effects on the Executive Branch agencies in terms of planning for their next year’s activities and lining up support contracts for all of the work that agencies dole out to others.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Mr. President – Ike would recommend the nuclear option for energy policy

    Dear President Obama: I was heartened to hear that you have put fighting climate change near the top of your “to do” list during your second term. It is time for you to dig through your memory banks, your pile of correspondence and the lessons you are learning by studying Eisenhower’s presidency to realize that…

  • Time to stop consuming precious resources to harmonize occupational dose limits

    Pressure groups and interested individuals have been striving for more than two decades to force the U. S. to reduce its occupational worker radiation protection limit from 50 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. The primary justification for this effort is that in 1991 the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) issued publication 60 and provided their…

  • Jaczko apologizes for distraction and implies he has been the victim of a coup

    On December 15, 2011, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing titled “Review of the NRC’s Near-Term Task Force Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century”. Instead of remaining on that topic, the hearing turned into a story where he said ‘A’, another guy said ‘A’, a woman said ‘A’, and a…

  • Atomic Show #149 – Pro Nuclear Bloggers Reaction to SOTU Address

    During the 2010 State of the Union Address, President Obama took the handcuffs off of the nuclear industry revival when he said: But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country….

  • Reduce, reuse, recycle – good for aluminum; good for uranium

    (Note: Video credit to Barry Brook of Brave New Climate.) The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy is taking issue with the idea of recycling used nuclear fuel to recover the energy that remains after the first pass of the fuel through a nuclear reactor. They have issued a call for action to encourage their members…

  • Atomic Show #236 – Local Nuclear NW, NE, Canada

    On March 30, 2015, I gathered a few of my pro-nuclear blogging friends together for a chat about recent events and activity in three separate areas, the Pacific Northwest, the US Northeast, and the eastern provinces of Canada. We also chatted about recent budget hearings for the DOE and the NRC and the way the…