2 Comments

  1. This phases out when the electricity sector hits 25% of 2022 emissions right? Is that country rid or specific to some regional subset? Do private plants and municipal grids count? Is it adjusted for the size of the sector (does it phase out when emissions per MWh is down to 25% or simple emissions? Seems like this credit could last basically forever if Wyoming for example decides to keep burning a bunch of coal.

  2. @Jon

    The Inflation Reduction Act is a US law. It begins to phase out based on US (national) electricity sector emissions. That includes all grid electricity, including public and investor owned generation.

    It is possible that the credit could last a long time. But it is unlikely that Wyoming, the site of one of the ADRP projects, will be responsible for any extensions because it wants to retain its coal fleet. In addition to the demonstration Natrium in Kemmerer, WY, TerraPower and PacificCorp are already performing site evaluations for 5 more power stations, each of which would be likely to host several Natrium units.

    If the future remotely resembles my internal predictions, the credit program will not last beyond 2040 because the specified conditions will have been met by then with momentum heading for nearly zero emissions from US electricity generation.

    26 U. S. Code 45Y(d)(3) describes the conditions for the phase out. (Section 48E references this section, equalizing the two programs.)

    (d) Credit phase-out
    ,,,
    (3) Applicable year
    For purposes of this subsection, the term “applicable year” means the LATER of—
    (A) the calendar year in which the Secretary determines that the annual greenhouse gas emissions from the production of electricity in the United States are equal to or less than 25 percent of the annual greenhouse gas emissions from the production of electricity in the United States for calendar year 2022, OR
    (B) 2032.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/45Y

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #329 – Dr. Kathryn Huff, former Assistant Secretary of Energy for Nuclear Energy

    The Honorable Dr. Kathryn Huff is an associate professor in the nuclear, plasma and radiological engineering department at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is the director of the Advanced Reactor Fuels laboratory and currently specializes in nuclear reactor core neutronics and multi-physics modeling. She served as the Assistant Secretary of Energy for Nuclear Energy…

  • Would a third party candidate use “N” word in debates on energy alternatives?

    I stayed up past my normal bedtime to watch the President and his one Establishment challenger engage in a carefully staged and poorly moderated “debate” last night. The supposed topic was domestic policy. One of the largest components of our domestic economy is the energy industry and one of the most significant contributors to our…

  • Will China convert existing coal plants to nuclear using HTR-PM reactors?

    It would be a huge benefit to the earth’s atmosphere if China, India, Brazil and the US could reduce direct coal burning while still making use of much of the capital that they have invested in building coal fired power plants. It would make an even larger difference in reducing air pollution in the areas…

  • John Rowe wants everyone (else) to buy natural gas

    The Philadelphia Inquirer recently ran a story titled Exelon’s Rowe an unlikely booster for shale gas. The headline writer was wrong; John Rowe is one of the most motivated natural gas salesmen in the United States right now. Though he will not receive any commission checks for his efforts, he stands to profit immensely if…

  • Fighting climate change skeptics in the pro nuclear community

    Discussions about science and technology are often colored by opinion, world views, and political alliances. Though everyone is entitled to their opinion but not their own facts, it is nearly impossible to remove bias, even in a technical discussion, because everyone has a tendency to pick which facts they prefer to introduce into an argument….