2 Comments

  1. This phases out when the electricity sector hits 25% of 2022 emissions right? Is that country rid or specific to some regional subset? Do private plants and municipal grids count? Is it adjusted for the size of the sector (does it phase out when emissions per MWh is down to 25% or simple emissions? Seems like this credit could last basically forever if Wyoming for example decides to keep burning a bunch of coal.

  2. @Jon

    The Inflation Reduction Act is a US law. It begins to phase out based on US (national) electricity sector emissions. That includes all grid electricity, including public and investor owned generation.

    It is possible that the credit could last a long time. But it is unlikely that Wyoming, the site of one of the ADRP projects, will be responsible for any extensions because it wants to retain its coal fleet. In addition to the demonstration Natrium in Kemmerer, WY, TerraPower and PacificCorp are already performing site evaluations for 5 more power stations, each of which would be likely to host several Natrium units.

    If the future remotely resembles my internal predictions, the credit program will not last beyond 2040 because the specified conditions will have been met by then with momentum heading for nearly zero emissions from US electricity generation.

    26 U. S. Code 45Y(d)(3) describes the conditions for the phase out. (Section 48E references this section, equalizing the two programs.)

    (d) Credit phase-out
    ,,,
    (3) Applicable year
    For purposes of this subsection, the term “applicable year” means the LATER of—
    (A) the calendar year in which the Secretary determines that the annual greenhouse gas emissions from the production of electricity in the United States are equal to or less than 25 percent of the annual greenhouse gas emissions from the production of electricity in the United States for calendar year 2022, OR
    (B) 2032.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/45Y

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #325 – Marco Visscher – The Power of Nuclear

    After many years as an independent journalist with an antinuclear bent, Marco Visscher began questioning his long-held beliefs. He realized that the accepted alternatives to fossil fuel were not actually reducing fossil fuel use so much as they were limiting the rate at which it was increasing. He began acknowledging that nuclear energy was a…

  • Plutonium: Valuable Fuel or Costly Waste?

    For more than forty years, the United States and the Soviet Union built nuclear weapons and aimed them at each other’s heartlands. The process of building those weapons was expensive in strict monetary terms and in terms of sacrificing investments in more productive enterprises. Now, however, the confrontational attitude between the two countries has been…

  • Impact of Pandora’s Promise

    One of the benefits of being “out there” in the social media world – which includes old fashioned email lists – is the opportunity to meet like minded souls without being limited to people who happen to be in your neighborhood or your physical social circle. I recently saw an exceptional commentary about Pandora’s Promise…

  • NuScale announces achievement of unlimited coping time

    At the Nuclear Energy Insider SMR Conference in Columbia, S.C., Dr. Jose Reyes, a co-founder and the Chief Technology Officer of NuScale Power, announced that his team had achieved an impressive design breakthrough. Two years after the Fukushima event, NuScale is introducing a safety system for our nuclear reactor that does not require DC batteries…

  • The Atomic Show #52 – Climate change controversy

    Shane and I discuss our understanding of human activity’s effects on global climate. As two geeks not trained in climate science, but comfortable with complex systems, our approach is unique. Unless you live under a rock, you have an opinion about whether or not man’s activity is causing a coming global catastrophe. Two recent films…