10 Comments

  1. Rod,

    The SMR race is happening on the international scene.

    The NRC will prove to be a liability for US projects.

    I think Russia is a no brainer for getting it done first.

  2. It is also time to address nuclear powered trains, planes, ships of all nature.

    And the role of the World Bank in helping the poor become energy independent.

    The World Bank sucks at its mission in finding ways to finance and introduce nuclear power in third world countries. I hope they do s better job once SMRs are available.

  3. We already have nuclear powered trains, anywhere the railways are electrified & the electricity comes from nuclear power.

  4. The biggest problem for new reactors, big or small, is finding a place to site them that won’t entangle you in years of political resistance. Plus you still have some states that won’t allow any new reactors to be deployed until the Federal government finally starts to take possession of spent fuel from commercial reactors.

    However, there are 65 nuclear sites in the US that could easily accommodate enough reactors for up to an 8 GWe capacity. So in theory, existing nuclear sites could accommodate enough new small nuclear reactors to supply all of the electricity in the US with no need for greenhouse gas polluting coal and natural gas electric power plants.

    Off-peak production of methanol fuel through water electrolysis and atmospheric CO2 extraction could be used for peak-load power production.

    Marcel F. Williams

  5. I hope that SMR conference grapples with PR and nuke public acceptance from things as this:

    http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/energy/nuclear/former-nrc-chairman-says-us-nuclear-industry-is-going-away

    As Steve Aplin soberly recently mentions in his latest pieces, often poor cousin priority public nuclear education and public opinion matters as much or more than discussions of reactor types. Without public and pol acceptance, the type of nukes being bantered at conferences won’t matter if its shunned by a public FUD-ed to death. PR and dealing with antis and FUD is a MAJOR component in any nuclear conference, not just handing out awards. Like in The Right Stuff, NASA early on learned without attracting public favor, no bucks, no Buck Rogers.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  6. Jaczko is displaying one of the more arrogant of the “Ugly American” tropes — speaking authoritatively as if the USA is the entire world.

    He also knows that nuclear energy is doomed because he hasn’t seen any movies with nuclear energy in them (Pandora’s Promise and The Cloud Atlas and Gravity and a couple of others excepted).

    And I’m sure Jaczko knows how much scientists appreciate and praise the presentation of science and engineering in the entertainment media.

  7. Sigh. Remember when it seemed like any company involved in heavy industry had a WORKING reactor design? Baldwin Locomotive, DuPont, etc.?

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Build baby build – new nuclear power plants

    CBS News aired a short piece titled US heat wave causes new look at nuclear energy that is worth a look. Though it includes the obligatory appearance of a professional antinuclear activist – in this case, Dr. Edwin Lyman of the Union of Concerned Scientists – the story provides some encouraging clips of the massive…

  • John Holdren nuclear energy’s importance as ultra low carbon power source – White House Summit on Nuclear Energy (WHSNE)

    John Holdren holds what might be the longest complete title available in the current Administration. He serves as Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). In his role as an…

  • Prefab Reactors For Off-Grid Users

    At the top of Mt. Washington, New Hampshire, for example, electricity for the weather station is provided by a diesel generator using fuel that must be moved by small tanker trucks struggling up a very steep grade. The Army Nuclear Power Program was established as part of the Atomic Energy Commission in 1954. It was…

  • Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

    Sizewell C is a project to build a 3,200 MWe power station consisting of two EPR units on the site that currently hosts a single large pressurized water reactor (Sizewell B). With the exception of site-specific foundations and structures, the new power station will be a copy of the station currently under construction at Hinkley…

  • Atomic Show #318 – Brian Gitt, Business Development, Oklo

    Brian Gitt, the Business Development lead at Oklo, visited the Atomic Show to describe his employer’s business model and current prospects. Oklo is an advanced fission and fuel recycling company with an expansive vision for becoming a competitive clean energy supplier. It plans to provide heat and/or electricity as a service from a fleet of…