• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

The Atomic Show #045 – Nuclear CANDU for Alberta oil sands production

January 18, 2007 By Rod Adams Leave a Comment

Alberta oil sands producers are taking a hard look at CANDU nuclear power plants.

Alberta Canada is one of the few areas in the world where oil production has increased rather dramatically during the past 5 years. The area has a vast resource of unconventional oil in the form of oil sands, where the concentration of oil in the sand to a significant depth is in excess of 10%. However, the oil tightly adheres to the sand and will not flow with normal drilling techniques. There are several ways to gather the oil in this region, but the one with the most potential requires the use of large quantities of steam in order to cause the oil to flow so that it can be pumped.

Even after the oil is gathered, it needs additional processing and upgrading steps, which also adds to the amount of energy investment needed to produce this oil. The current source of the energy is natural gas, but the supply growth is limited and the cost is increasing with the market price of natural gas.

The solution that appears ever more likely is to build some CANDU (Canadian Deuterium) nuclear reactors in the oil producing region to provide vast quantities of steam and electricity. See, for example: Oilsands tax incentives questioned.

Shane and I like the idea and provide some comments about why it might be good to pursue the possibilities.

Here are some links that might be useful if you want to do some additional research.

Argonne has a good introductory page with pictures of processes;

also good facts that are backed up by Wikipedia references:

http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/tarsands/index.cfm

This is the original paper that Shane found a few years ago concerning

the natural synergy between nuclear energy and oil sand extraction;

He especially likes the fact that the oil sand resources, after they are

cleaned of their bitumen, are often good zirconium ores:

http://www.cns-snc.ca/events/CCEO/nuclearenergyindustry.pdf
http://s3.amazonaws.com/AtomicShowFiles/tpn_atomic_20070116_045.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 48:36 — 16.7MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Economics, Podcast

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bruno Garcia says

    January 30, 2007 at 1:38 AM

    I just read a article about atomic batteries but it wasnt very good tecnicly

    can you do a show about it

    Reply
  2. David Lewis says

    February 6, 2010 at 10:39 AM

    Enough Canadians have similar “safety” concerns as Americans do about nuclear power that I wonder when I hear talk like this, i.e. that nuclear could power the extraction of oil out of the sand there, if it will ever get off the ground. (I am Canadian, living in the US on a green card at present).

    The resource is very large, but the reserves (i.e. what the official reserves as recognized by whatever international body recognizes these things are “only” roughly comparable to those of Saudi Arabia, 170 billion barrels, say. The rest, I think ten times as large, is buried too deep for current techniques, although the sky would be the limit if the price goes high enough. The problem with this resource is, of course, CO2 emissions when it is burned, which I hope will tax this extraction business out of existence, unless they can figure out how to keep the CO2 from entering the atmosphere, or how to economically remove it from the atmosphere. Chilchinisky at Columbia is developing a process for air capture of CO2 she has been touting that she says can turn any industrial plant, i.e. coal fired electricity generation station, etc, into a net carbon sink because her air capture process can use the waste heat to remove more than enough CO2 to compensate for all the CO2 the coal plant emits as it produces the electricity. She wrote the cap and trade section of the Kyoto agreement, so I took her seriously enough to ask her for details about all this but its under wraps until the pilot plant is unveiled in California first quarter 2010, she says.

    I’d like to hear you discuss the MAPLE reactors that it looks like Canada will not put into service. They were built to replace the aging Chalk River reactor that was producing such a large percentage of the world’s medical isotopes that Canada is the biggest single supplier, only the regulator will not approve startup because “safety” cannot be guaranteed, according to the regulator. It is astonishing.

    I first heard about this (as a former nuclear agnostic only recently following nuclear developments with some enthusiasm) on Canada’s national public radio science show Quirks and Quarks. The link to download the mp3 file of the segment of the show concerning the reactors is:

    http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/media/2009-2010/mp3/qq-2009-11-28_04.mp3

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy