Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 Comments

  1. “Restoring power will be difficult because the storm did not hit one particular region especially hard. Instead, the strong winds sent trees tumbling and severed power lines in virtually all corners of Vermont.”

    Only you could turn that into supporting centralized power plants, which depend on power lines. I’ll bet the natural gas lines, mostly underground, suffered little damage.

  2. Hey Rod, I don’t understand the movie quote: “Who knows, maybe we can dig up a Democrat.” Could you give some insight?

    I also don’t understand Pu239’s point; maybe he wants to go live off the grid somewhere with only a gas pipe going to his cabin.

  3. @PU239

    You misunderstood my reference. I was only pointing out that in the aftermath of a power outage, people are much more interested in the power system and how it came to be. Mr. Klein made a number of statements referencing that fact.

  4. @scaryjello

    The quote from White Christmas (1954) indicates that Democrats were rare in VT. It was a state with a large majority of Republicans (or independents).

  5. “angels, doing God’s work.”
    People who think like that have put a giant roadblock in the way figuring out if they are wrong & correcting themselves

  6. What would be the response from the crowd/speaker if Meredith Angwin (Yes Vermont Yankee blog author) were to roll up hot with a sweater to knit in the front row and interject with the virtues of the VY plant, explaining how the loss generation has been replaced one-for-one with natural gas?

    In addition to the inaccuracies mentioned, Tony Klein also states that electricity losses from transmission are “anywhere from 15-50%” – EIA data puts the loss at 7% with long distance losses at 10%. His miss information appears to contradict his support of remote ridge-line wind projects, which requires long distant transmission lines. Additionally, utility scale wind projects, with towering 1.5-3 MW turbines, also appear to contradict the ‘back to land’ idea of locally growing your own food, chopping your own wood, and generating your own power with distributed solar and micro wind. The only consistency I find with so called renewable advocates (with ideas ranging from PV w/ powerwalls to hot rock storage to continual super grids), is their unified opposition to nuclear.

  7. Pu239.
    Just a note that Vermont has one gas pipeline. It used to serve only the Burlington region, but after three years of construction and an almost 100% cost overrun, the pipeline has been extended 41 miles and also serves Middlebury.

    The pipeline extension was so unpopular that I doubt that any more pipelines are likely to be built.

    In Vermont, propane and oil for home heating are delivered by truck.

    https://vtdigger.org/2017/07/14/state-regulators-investigate-vermont-gas-pipeline-burial-depth/#.WhXVSjLMwUE

    https://vtdigger.org/2016/06/22/vermont-gas-pipeline-costs-jump-7-8-percent-to-165-6-million/#.WhXWwzLMwUE

Similar Posts

  • History of the Antinuclear Movement

    Instead of producing a lengthy, original post for you to read, I am going to ask you to invest the time in reading three important and related posts: The History of the Antinuclear Movement – Part 1, History of the Antinuclear Movement, Part 2a and History of the Antinuclear Movement, Part 2b. Whether you are…

  • Atomic Show #196 – Atomic Optimists

    On Sunday, February 17, 2013, a group of five nuclear energy professionals gathered to share their thoughts about the current state of the atomic energy business. Participants included: Margaret Harding (@M2harding), 4 Factor Consulting Meredith Angwin (@yes_VY), Yes Vermont Yankee Andrea Jennetta (@NuclearBuzz), Fuel Cycle Week and I Dig Uranium Cal Abel (@cal_abel), PhD candidate…

  • Mark Jacobson pushing his plans in appropriate location – late night comedy show

    On October 9, 2013, David Letterman interviewed Mark Z. Jacobson, a leading proponent of a 100% renewable energy future. He described Jacobson as a man with a plan that should make us all more optimistic; that plan describes a world that has a completely changed energy supply system that does not threaten us with catastrophic…

  • Mark Cooper is wrong about SMRs and nuclear energy

    Mark Cooper of the Vermont Law School has published another paper in a series critiquing the economics of nuclear energy; this one is titled The Economic Failure of Nuclear Power and the Development of a Low Carbon Electricity Future: Why Small Modular Reactors are Part of the Problem and Not the Solution. It is not…

  • Jaczko must go

    My professional work habits and standards were formed by 33 years in the US naval service, an organization with a proud tradition of developing independent decision makers who could be entrusted with billions of dollars worth of national assets and thousands of lives. Our tradition includes demanding training, strong mentoring programs, regular competitive evaluations and…

  • Another hurdle that Jaczko is erecting in front of the Nuclear Renaissance

    I realize that my topic selection during the past couple of days might have given the mistaken impression that NRC Chairman Greg Jaczko’s action to derail the Yucca Mountain project is the main reason that I think that the man is a hazard to the prosperity of my grandchildren. People who have been reading Atomic…