• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Public meetings about William S. Lee nuclear project near Gaffney, SC

January 12, 2012 By Rod Adams

The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission is planning to hold two identical public meetings to discuss the draft environmental impact statement for the William States Lee nuclear power station units 1 and 2 that are proposed for a site near Gaffney, SC.

The public will be allowed to present comments and ask questions. People who are interested in speaking can register in advance by January 17 or they can sign up on sheets that will be provided at the meeting within 15 minutes of the start of the scheduled start time.

Some of my friends are planning to attend and provide nuclear energy informational material along with some fresh baked cookies. It is a good opportunity for people who live or work in the area to express their support for building new nuclear power stations.

Historical note of interest: The site where the William States Lee Nuclear Station is being planned is the same place where Duke Energy started to build the Cherokee Nuclear Station. After that project was cancelled, the incomplete containment buildings sat idle for many years.

In 1986, Earl Owensby, a film producer from North Carolina, purchased the unused containment and support buildings and converted them to a movie set. That set was used for the underwater scenes for the movie “The Abyss”; the containment building held more than 7.5 million gallons of water.

(Source: Movies Filmed in South Carolina – The Abyss)

“The Abyss” (March 2003) is an amusing story of two self-described computer nerds who visited the movie set on a lark. There are several photos, even some that include the underwater vehicle used in the movie.

The story of the visit to the abandoned Cherokee nuclear plant brings back some very recent memories; I think I passed within just a few miles of the site while traveling the backroads between Augusta, GA and Spartanburg, SC during the week between Christmas and New Years. The towns along the way haven’t changed a bit from the way that the nerds described them as they saw them in 2003. It is an area that houses thousands of people who would gain a substantial benefit by hosting a multibillion dollar construction project.

One of my self-assigned missions in life is to do all I can to help make the next Atomic Age so much of a success that there are not any abandoned, partially finished buildings available for use as a movie set.

Filed Under: New Nuclear, Public meetings

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kit P says

    January 12, 2012 at 11:23 AM

    Good post Rod. I second Rod motion to attend a meeting if you can. It is the best way support new nukes that I can think of.

    I also recommend reading the EIS for at least one nuke plant and one solar plant in California. Most who advocated renewable energy have no clue about the environmental impact of renewable energy. While reading, pay close attention to the word ‘impact’. The criteria is not no impact but no significant impact. So what is the most important statement in this EIS?

    “The NRC staff’s preliminary recommendation to the Commission related to the environmental aspects of the proposed action is that the COLs be issued as proposed.”

  2. Joel Riddle says

    January 16, 2012 at 12:43 AM

    Posting this here since there are so few comments under this posting, and since it is very loosely related by being about something from South Carolina.

    I thought Rod, Cal, and any others who have served on nuclear submarines might find this Civil War submarine interesting.

    http://yhoo.it/wWIdZM

    Also, with this recent cruise ship incident, it seems that cruises can be put on the list of things less safe than nuclear power.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy