Search Results for: rockefeller

| |

Neural network analysis “unequivocally” reveals threshold dose response in atomic bomb victims

ByRod Adams

…sed on a focused effort by eugenicists working with grants provided by the Rockefeller Foundation. Focus on what I said – no negative health effects have ever been detected. The “genetic” changes Muller and his allies were supposedly trying to prevent were not measured; they were invented out of whole cloth and rather cleverly described as something that we would never be able to find because the effects of the “mutated” genes might show up in dis…

|

ALARA causes and reinforces excessive fear of low dose radiation

ByRod Adams

…and his supporting foundation – the oil-soaked, but officially non-profit Rockefeller Foundation – finally achieved measurable success on June 13, 1956 with the following New York Times headline. The oil industry also crosses into “unfair” practices when it hires green surrogates to fight against a competitor under the guise of “environmentalism.” If the oil industry wants to protect its interests fairly, it could simply explain why it believes i…

|

Disastrous consequences of LNT model at Fukushima Daiichi

ByRod Adams

…dequate resources since 1956. The effort actually started in 1925 when the Rockefeller Foundation provided Hermann Muller and the University of Texas with funds to conduct x-ray irradiation — at doses whose minimum was 400 R (4 Sv) — of fruit flies and report the results as being proof that radiation is harmful instead of being accurately reported as “radiation is harmful when received at too high a dose without adequate recovery time.” Cyril R….

|

Trump Budget Blueprint For DOE Will Revive Yucca Conflict. Does Little To Enable Nuclear

ByRod Adams

…that are based on evidence to be protective of human health instead of the Rockefeller Foundation-invented myth that all radiation carries a greater than zero probability of causing harm. JamesEHopf Rod, I hear ya, with respect to absurd dose limits affect on the cost of actually building a repository (although it still only amounts to a fraction of a cent/kW-hr). The thrust of my comment was that we should still license it, even if we don’t opt t…

|

Would a third party candidate use “N” word in debates on energy alternatives?

ByRod Adams

…e hydrocarbon, media, and IT industries besides the rich families like the Rockefeller foundation or Microsoft Bill & Melinda Gates foundation etc. etc. I line up on nuclear energy but the type of nuclear energy that is not isotope, or fuel cycle specific. I do favor scaled smaller multi-use NPPs all based on the local economics, energy requirements, and returning value price point prices to safe efficient NPP service operations to all levels of g…

| |

James Hansen is worried about CO2 and realistic about solutions

ByRod Adams

…It is sourced directly from the elitist Zero Population Growth/Paul Erlich/Rockefeller philosophy that is the real reason we have not developed amazing atomic energy products that would make coal, oil and gas worth less. I have good friends with zero children and good friends with 9 children. I even had a good friend at one duty station with a dozen children – only 8 of which were his natural children and the other four were adopted from disadvant…

| | | | |

Nuclear energy makes a cameo appearance in Jeff Gibbs’s Planet of the Humans

ByRod Adams

…reinforced by people with motives, influence, and financial resources. The Rockefellers are closely tied to numerous iterations and branches of Malthusian thinking, lecturing, book writing, coalition building, and promotion for three generations spread over more than a century. IMO, one major motive is that their wealth and power is closely associated with the perception that the fuels needed to power our improving way of life are finite and limit…

| |

Arnie Gundersen does not like nuclear plants that provide several hundred high paying jobs

ByRod Adams

…nvironmental movement by charities endowed by oil fortunes such as Pew and Rockefeller. These same foundations also fund internationalist oriented organizations which consider an independent nuclear power infrastructure an obstacle to global control. Hence Lovins. Gundersen claims that the AP1000 has only a 0.7 psi margin of safety. This is the difference between a deterministic worst case accident peak pressure and the minimum design pressure of…

End of content

End of content