16 Comments

  1. I suppose you have to admire loyalty, but there may still come a time when the burden of carrying Jaczko may be more than Markey wants to invest in.

    Correction for you Rod: The Vogtle design safety report was Aug 2011.

  2. Markey is a Democrat. That says it all.

    BTW, Walker wins. Union thuggery is being recognized for what it is.

    Long live the Republic and the Constitution!

  3. Markey can say whatever he wants, what matters is whether anyone listens. Personally, I have been a Democrat my whole life, but I stopped paying any attention to Markey decades ago … he’s ridiculous.

  4. Is it in the charter of the NRC IG to have a role in safety. Typically the IG has no operational role and is there only to ensure internal compliance. What Markey said seems fishy.

  5. There was a time when the political reporters in the major media would pick up on stunts like this and blow the bad actor out of the water. This is seldom seen now. I like to think this is because the major media have fallen on hard times. Other less charitable explanations are that reporters have become lazy or that the major media have become lap dogs of the political process.

    Instead, we have bloggers filling the void. Good work, Rod!

  6. Does anyone have a clear idea of why anti-nuclear obstructionism has become such a trademark for Markey? His various bios out there don’t say much about it.

  7. I have a theory that Markey is well supported by natural gas interests, especially those who import natural gas into the lucrative northeast power market. Getting rid of plants like Maine Yankee, Indian Point 1, Connecticut Yankee, and Yankee Rowe helped to make that market what it is today, but his supporters eyes are set on what it might be if antinuclear activism can shut down Vermont Yankee, Indian Point and Pilgrim.

    I have expanded upon that theory in the following posts:

    https://atomicinsights.com/2011/10/ed-markey-lng-and-antinuclear-activity.html

    https://atomicinsights.com/2012/02/has-the-mit-energy-initiative-been-captured-by-natural-gas-industry-money.html

  8. My last message was posted at 4:50 … It is 4:50 and 2 seconds later it appears.

    Have the delay problems been solved ?

  9. Rod,

    I am getting near real time posting on my comments. I reckon the response time issues are behind us.

  10. The report was due a week ago. Wanna bet its under the rugs somewhere in Washington and will never be made public now that Dr J has left the building.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Energiewende – planned by industry and government without customer considerations

    Jim Conca recently published a blog on Forbes titled European Economic Stability Threatened By Renewable Energy Subsidies. One of the earliest comments in the growing thread on that blog provided an interesting point of view about Germany’s decision to abandon nuclear energy in favor of unreliable power sources backed up by flexible lignite, coal and…

  • Is Bill McKibben really serious about climate change?

    Andy Revkin recently published a post on his Dot Earth blog titled A Communications Scholar Analyzes Bill McKibben’s Path on Climate. In one of the videos that is embedded in the article, Matthew Nisbet describes Bill McKibben as a public intellectual and compares his activism on climate to that of Rachel Carson on the effects…

  • Diablo Canyon relicensing public meetings August 5, 2015

    On November 23, 2009 — close to six years ago — the Pacific Gas and Electric Company filed a license renewal application for Diablo Canyon units 1 and 2. That renewal application continues its excruciatingly slow journey through obstacles that continue to be invented by people who are opposed to the use of nuclear energy….

  • Rationally comparing financial risk – nuclear versus natural gas (#1 of ??)

    Yesterday I wrote about the need to rationally compare the physical risks associated with producing energy by burning natural gas against the similar risks of producing energy by fissioning uranium in a nuclear power plant. However, even when decision makers includes some reasonable estimates for those kinds of risks, they are still often choosing to…

  • Attacking the “root crown” of 10 CFR 810 nuclear power plant export controls

    Bottom line up front. Atomic fuel utilization facilities should not be subjected to the export control regime that is supposed to be focused on special nuclear materials production facilities. Instead, utilization facility exports should be subjected to rules similar to those that apply to other advanced technology exports like aircraft, computers, and communications equipment. The…

  • Established media gets an advance look at NRC IG report on Jaczko

    In keeping with a familiar pattern, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Chairman Gregory Jaczko issued a press release in advance of the the official release of a damaging NRC Inspector General (IG) report about him. In my opinion, for what little it is worth, it is another example of his routine abuse of the power of…