12 Comments

  1. If you like Science Fiction, the ‘Culture’ SF novels by Iain M. Banks might appeal to you (I enjoyed ‘Look to Windward’). The Culture is described as a post-scarcity society. 40 Trillion humans live on various planets or constructs with every conceivable need satisfied … by advanced technology. It’s a lot nicer future to imagine than squatting in a grass hut.

  2. As opposed to the frustrated, slightly gloomy, less frequently blogging Rod.

  3. Time to wake up, Al Gore. He is all over the news these days over climate change.

  4. Fred Thompson:

    Former Vice President Al Gore refuted claims that global warning is a myth, saying that 98% of the worlds’ scientists agree.

    Coincidentally, the same 98% who survive by angling for government grants.

    —–

    I don’t “believe in” global warming. It’s not a religion to me. But to the liberal progressive atheist whose life lacks a God, he has to make one up to fill the vacuum.

    At the same time it’s wrong to dump pollution into the atmosphere and water. God made us in His image and likeness and He expects us to behave accordingly – with a sense of responsibility and accountability. God gave Adam and Eve dominion over the Earth so that they would be careful stewards of His creation. But those two words – responsibility and accountability – are forever anathema to the liberal progressive just as they were (and are) to the Serpent. BTW, exactly WHAT are you guys progressing towards? Is that like the right to choose? Choose what? Murder?

    Nope, no goddess Gaia for me.

  5. In Banks’ Culture, however these humans are basically pets, kept by the Minds, who are artificial intelligences which run everything.

    While the books are entertaining, I personally would not care to live in such a society.

  6. @Joel – we all go through ups and downs, though I guess mine can be higher and lower than most. It was getting tiring to keep reading about how cheap natural gas is going to save us – especially when those words are coming from people who are supposedly leaders in the nuclear industry.

    I guess my feeling of slight betrayal is somewhat similar to the way a Red Sox fan would feel if his team owner was filmed clapping and cheering as Derek Jeter hit a home run.

  7. Hi Rod. I’m sure you’ve noticed natural gas prices seem to have seen their bottom under $2 and are heading up. Arthur Berman has already shown convincingly (at the oildrum website http://www.theoildrum.com/node/8212) that the economics of shale gas development probably begin around $8 or $9 /mmBTU. So the current very low natural gas prices around $2 are only a temporary blip in the scale of things.

    I’m betting the long-term natural gas prices will average around $6 to $8 at least, up from around $4 historically, assuming that natural gas production (at least in the US) will increasingly depend on unconventional natural gas production. Do you agree? Is that what has lifted your spirits? 😉

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Hydrocarbon marketers had a motive to oppose nuclear energy growth

    Why have the efforts to restrict nuclear energy development been so well supported for so many years? My theory is that hydrocarbon marketers have had a strong financial motive for supporting any group that seeks to reduce the supply of energy. Even when those groups seem to be fighting against the hydrocarbon industry, they are…

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. disavows need for individuals to change behavior

    During the march held in New York City on September 21, PJTV reporter Michelle Fields spoke with Robert F. Kennedy about his plans to change his personal consumption habits. The good news is that RFK Jr. has absolved all of us of having to make any changes in our personal choices; the bad news is…

  • The New Fire project nears completion. Please prove there’s an eager market

    Advanced nuclear reactor development is so vibrant, interesting and important that it has attracted a filmmaking team. The filmmakers, led by David Schumacher and Derek Wiesenhahn, are telling a story about some of the projects that aim to produce new ways to use fission to power society. The projects have been created by dedicated, interesting…

  • Michael Brune of Sierra Club calls nuclear energy irrelevant. Robert Stone says it’s vital to our future

    During the promotional period leading up to CNN’s initial airing of Pandora’s Promise, Michael Brune, executive direction of the Sierra Club, and Robert Stone, the director of Pandora’s Promise, engaged in a meaningful discussion about nuclear energy hosted by Kate Bolduan. During the discussion, Brune explains that the Sierra Club believes that nuclear energy projects…

  • Existing nuclear plants are valuable and worth saving

    Many currently operating nuclear plants are in danger of being permanently shut down due to temporary conditions including low, but volatile natural gas prices, improperly designed markets that fail to recognize the value of reliable generating capacity, quotas and mandates that result in certain types of electrical generators receiving direct monetary payments in addition to…

  • Time for rational risk evaluation of energy sources – natural gas versus nuclear

    It is way past time to begin the long process of helping people understand how to rationally weigh the risks versus benefits of available power or fuel systems. For far too many years, promoters of immensely profitable products like natural gas have been loudly and frequently telling society about its benefits while glossing over the…