5 Comments

  1. So far from what I read I like that company. Specifically the smaller, more manageable systems and ideas like underground reactors.

    I hope those that are involved there are motivated. More than just their financial success is at issue here. Much more. I also hope they can pull it off and improve the nuclear power technology footprint in this country and elsewhere.

  2. Rod – can you get us some pictures or technical details that are not proprietary? For example, which software language are they using for the operating system? Will the simulator be qualified for engineering analyses or just operator training? Have they decided how many units will be operated from a common control room and how many operators will be required? My understanding is that the last question is still being negotiated with the NRC.

  3. You mention this is one control room for 2 reactors. As I understand, the current regulations require one control room per reactor. Obviously with digital control systems one control room could control dozens of reactors. Has the NRC made any decisions about changing this rule to modernize the control room technology?

  4. @Jason

    Current regulations allow for more than one reactor to be controlled from one control room.

    The table in 10 CFR 50.54 includes a column for staffing levels for two reactors controlled by a single control room.

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-0054.html

    The NRC has been studying the impact of digital control systems and the potential for even more units to be controlled from a single room, but no rule changes have been issued.

    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/agreement/ia0137/

  5. @Atomicrabbit

    I will ask some of my colleagues to attempt to answer your questions.

    As you might understand, there are commercial considerations involved in oversharing too early. Believe it or not, our competitors are members of the public who can also read blogs.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Radioimmunontherapy (RIT) for follicular lymphoma

    Andrew Schorr, the founder and host of Patient Power, interviewed Dr. Anton Hagenbeek of the University Medical Center Utrecht Netherlands about the result of clinical trials of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) to combat follicular lymphoma. The treatment uses a monoclonal antibody that is covalently bound to Y-90, which is a beta emitter. The monoclonal antibody selectively binds…

  • Atomic Show #215 – Armond Cohen, CATF, describes need for nuclear

    Armond Cohen is the Executive Director of the Clean Air Task Force. We spoke in January 2008 on episode #78 of the Atomic Show. At that time, Armond and his organization did not take a position on nuclear energy. On March 28 of this year, I heard Armond give a talk at the commemoration of…

  • PM-3A Design and Construction: Rapid Pace to Fulfill a Need

    Between January 1 and March 1, 1962, the plant was assembled by a team of contractors and military technicians. On March 4, 1962, the plant reached initial criticality. The U. S. Navy began intensive involvement in Antarctic research missions during 1955 in preparation for the International Geophysical Year. The Department of Defense assigned the Navy…

  • Lockheed’s fusion sales pitch

    Please count me as an extreme skeptic on the possibility of anything useful coming from the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works fusion project described in the below commercial. The only explanation I can think of for the recent hype and attention given to this project is that there is a competition that I do not know…

  • NRC Vision And Strategy For Licensing Advanced Reactors Needs Improvement

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published its vision and strategy for preparing to review applications for permission to begin building reactors that do not use light water as the coolant. Policy makers who are interested in ensuring that American reactor developers have the opportunity to lead in the nascent – but potentially very lucrative field – of…