Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One Comment

  1. 119 million pounds of Uranium is approximately $72 trillion of oil at $100/bbl in equivalent heating value, or 22 years of current world consumption; $8 trillion of coal at $40/ton, or approx. 30 years of current world consumption. This is assuming 82 TJ/kg of Uranium metal.

    Just at one spot in Viriginia.

Similar Posts

  • The Atomic Show #135 – Tom Sanders – President, American Nuclear Society

    Tom Sanders took office as the President of the American Nuclear Society on June 18, 2009. Rod Adams spoke with him on the day before. Tom explained his goals for the year, the importance of nuclear technology to national security and the enthusiasm that he has for “right-sized” reactors. Podcast: Play in new window |…

  • I was wrong. FOE UK has already decided to ignore evidence about nuclear benefits

    A couple of days ago, I happily reported on an article by Mark Lynas indicating that Friends of the Earth (FOE) UK was reconsidering its stance on nuclear energy. Aside Mark’s article reminded readers that FOE is a federation, not a monolithic organization; each country’s chapter can produce its own policies. End Aside. Mark based…

  • Atomic Show #164 – Fukushima Discussion by Pro Nuclear Communicators

    On Sunday, March 20, a group of pro nuclear energy communicators gathered to chat about the events at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station following a devastating earthquake and tsunami that put the entire station into a blackout condition. As predicted at the very beginning of the casualty, there have been no releases of radioactive…

  • Waste Confidence – A Classic Case of Failed Leadership (Part 2 of 2)

    By Paul T. Dickman Paul Dickman was a career Federal environmental scientist specializing in nuclear waste and nuclear materials management. He served as Chief of Staff to NRC Chairman Dale E. Klein. Part 2 of 2 NRC’s Draft Waste Confidence Decision Update of October 2008 was based on an understanding of that the DOE would…