• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

The Atomic Show #153 – Suzy Hobbs Founder PopAtomic.org

April 29, 2010 By Rod Adams

Suzy Hobbs is a talented artist with a passion for atomic energy. She has created an organization of fellow artists whose mission is to create images that help people understand why there are intelligent, talented engineers, technicians, scientists and teachers who love the idea of using fission to replace fossil fuel combustion in as many places as possible.

I spoke with her on April 28, 2010. Her enthusiasm is infectious. If you want to find out more about Suzy, her studio or how you can employ her little army of artists to help you communicate challenging subjects to a wider audience, please visit PopAtomic.org

http://s3.amazonaws.com/AtomicShowFiles/tpn_atomic_20100428_153.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 36:59 — 17.0MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Alternative energy, Atomic Entrepreneurs, Podcast

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. theanphibian says

    April 30, 2010 at 3:42 AM

    There are indeed painted cooling towers that are in operation.

    The smiley face cooling tower does not exist (in real life). The one I’m talking about is the Cruas plant in France. You can see some of the mural here:

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cruas-1.JPG

    I’ve worked on the Wikipedia article on that plant, and I can say that we USED to have an absolutely beautiful gallery. But sadly they got deleted eventually because someone didn’t put the right copyright info in it. Such is the problem with free licensing, apparently this was done because France does not have “freedom from paranoia” laws. Apparently not. But the Cruas plant is alive with healthy capacity factors and 4 full-sized reactors.

    I’m really happy to hear an artists perspective of things. I’m very familiar with the Asheville/Boone area. I think the environmental movement there shows a lot of the problems with the concept in general. All ‘sustainable’ products have the prerequisite that it has to allow people to keep feeling good about themselves to keep the tourism money flowing. The economy primary lies in monetizing the pleasing nature of the environment. It is thus little surprise that it’s near impossible to put up a wind turbine there.

  2. Suzy Hobbs says

    April 30, 2010 at 7:16 AM

    Thanks so much for sharing the Cruas plant images! I sincerely hope that I have the opportunity to give our nuclear fleet (or at least part of it) a much needed makeover! I have some pretty big ideas that would fit just perfectly on a cooling tower!

    This kind of fun, community oriented artwork would be an opportunity to bring attention to some of the really great things happening in the industry like: new small modular reactor technologies (reduce), relicensing of many plants (reuse), and down-blending weapons materials into spendable fuel (recycle)!

  3. Reese says

    May 2, 2010 at 7:30 AM

    No, YOU’re an idiot.

    I mean, “You’re an idiot, sir.”

  4. Reese says

    May 2, 2010 at 8:20 AM

    Umm, I regret I put it that way. I hold you in high esteem for many reasons.

    I just am accustomed to a better argument from you than that.

    I mean, “I just am accustomed to a better argument from you than that, sir.”

    • Rod Adams says

      May 2, 2010 at 8:41 AM

      Reese – there were many topics discussed during the show. Can you be more specific about the portion that you thought needed improvement? The basic topic here was that the nuclear industry could do a better job of marketing its product. Do you think the industry has no room for improvement in its communications effort?

  5. Rasmus says

    May 10, 2010 at 1:19 AM

    Another painted cooling tower exists at the Kalkar site in Germany. This was going to be Germany’s first fast breeder reactor, but never went online. It is now an amusement park:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNR-300

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/xmyrxn/2675526124/

  6. Rasmus says

    May 10, 2010 at 1:37 AM

    I think that modifications in the external design of nuclear plants can help a great deal with public perception of nuclear power. Those things DO matter, although pure engineering types may scoff at this. To be realistic, the NRC has a long list of things they are concerned about, and design is not even on that list.

    * paint cooling towers, bury ugly transmission lines in the ground

    * futuristic designs, round shapes, ferrocement, … imagine if a nuclear plant was designed like the Sydney Opera House ! There is tremendous untapped potential in improving public perception.

    * local adaptations, emphasizing local resources and community (e.g. limestone, red bricks, elaborate masonry …)

    * do something ecologically useful with hot wastewater (e.g. hotwater artificial wetland); water coming out of a nuclear plant is not only hot but also rich in oxygen, attracting fish. In cold climates, the waste heat could also heat year-round greenhouse ecospheres such as the Eden Project: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eden_Project

  7. Beige says

    June 3, 2010 at 9:18 AM

    I saw another painted cooling tower in Germany, not sure what plant (not necessarily nuclear, but the towers are the same no matter the fuel).

  8. Rasmus says

    June 15, 2010 at 8:11 AM

    More painted cooling towers, this time in South Africa: this wins the world cup of cooling tower designs. Unfortunately, not of a nuke plant but of an old coal plant. Booo !

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycviarachel/2488938914/in/photostream/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycviarachel/2488931044/in/photostream/

  9. Alan says

    July 1, 2011 at 12:17 AM

    I came back here as I was cleaning up old links and I think that it would be fun to talk about painting structures more given what has transpired since.

    The Fukushima Daiichi plants had clouds painted on their containment buildings (outer one of course). In retrospect, was this a good idea? It seems that the iconic imagery that came from the event was the wireframe left after the Hydrogen explosion and the clouds… really didn’t matter. I would venture to claim that not mattering in a negative light would be a positive in this case. If one paints “SAFE” all over the external of a power plant, then well… the media would problem love that in any event that something goes wrong.

  10. Twominds says

    February 25, 2012 at 10:50 AM

    I just heard this podcast and I think I have another interesting mural on a building linked to the nuclear industry.

    Below is a link to the site where The Netherlands keep their used fuel and radwaste from medical and industrial use. The building itself is the place where high level waste is stored.

    The mural depicts the Einstein formula, reminding people of the energy in nuclear fuel. Every time the building gets a new coat of paint, it will be painted in a lighter colour, till it will be white in a hundred years, indicating the time that the site will be functioning until a definitive choice is made what to do with the ‘waste’. And I seem to remember that is was a statement that the radioactive materials inside would grow less dangerous over time. I don’t have a reference or link for that, though.

    They are very busy with art and exhibitions by the way.

    Here’s their link http://www.covra.nl/ if you like a look. It has an English version, but there you won’t find their news articles about their hosting exhibitions.

    Link to a better picture of the building.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Covra_het_gebouw.JPG

  11. Twominds says

    February 25, 2012 at 6:57 PM

    Correction on my first post: The Netherlands only store the fission products of the used fuel. It is reprocessed in La Hague in France,and the fission products come back to be stored here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gene Nelson, Ph.D. on Atomic Energy Wells

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy