• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Atomic Show #153 – Suzy Hobbs Founder PopAtomic.org

April 29, 2010 By Rod Adams

Suzy Hobbs is the founder of PopAtomic.org, a group of artists whose mission and passion is to use their artistic skills to create images that help people view nuclear energy as something more approachable and worth understanding. She visited The Atomic Show on April 28, 2010 and shared the story of how she developed her passion. Please go and listen. Her way of communicating is infectious; it is hard not to develop an optimistic outlook while hearing her tell about using art as a communication path.

If you want to find out more about PopAtomic.org or if you have some ideas that you need help in communicating, please visit PopAtomic.org

Related Posts

  • Using art to communicate about nuclear energy - PopAtomic Ted Talk

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Managing member at Nucleation Capital, LP.
Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Para Noid says

    April 29, 2010 at 2:28 PM

    So on the heels of “Drill Baby Drill” we have the BP explosion and spill. Then we also have coal mine disaster after coal mine disaster. I expect a highly publicized nuclear incident soon. Hopefully Suzy can prepare appropriate response materials ahead of time.

    • PopAtomic says

      April 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM

      It is interesting that you bring that up, seeing as there has already been a recent “incident” at the Vermont Yankee reactor. Despite the fact that only very small, harmless amounts of radiation were released and no one was hurt of killed, there is serious talk of shutting down the plant. This would mean that new coal plants would have to be constructed to replace the $100 million worth of electricity created at Vermont Yankee annually.
      On the other hand, despite multiple recent accidents in the fossil fuel industry and many lives lost, there is little consideration of reducing our reliance on dangerous, dirty, limited resources …much less actually shutting down coal plants. There is a double standard at work here that is not based in science or the best interest of the population.
      And, Yes, I am absolutely prepared to defend nuclear energy considering it has, by far, the best record of any energy source in terms of resource management, safety, and cost effectiveness.
      I will continue to support nuclear energy by bringing to light all that clean fission has to offer in a positive way, rather than focusing on unfounded fear, because quite frankly its just a waste of time. Might I suggest you give it a try, Para Noid!

      • Para Noid says

        April 29, 2010 at 7:36 PM

        No, I agree with all you’ve said. I just think that these days we’re always being surprised by the news; it’s a good time to expect the unexpected.

      • Finrod says

        April 29, 2010 at 10:20 PM

        There are highly publicised harmless incidents at nuclear plants all the time. No doubt something new will be reported soon.

  2. Ed Peschko says

    April 30, 2010 at 1:03 PM

    Rod and Suzy,
    Just an FYI, the program that you mentioned in your interview is called ‘our friend the atom’ and it’s on youtube:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcdRQkJulAU&feature=related
    Anyways, nice interview btw. I heartily agree that there is a huge gap between the engineers and the public. so you are definitely filling a void here..
    Ed

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Kenneth Pitzer blamed AEC advisors for slow power reactor development

Why did the US Atomic Energy Commission kill Daniels Pile in 1947?

How did an oil shale investor hamstring his atomic energy competition? (Ancient but impactful smoking gun)

Improved atomic energy offers a pathway that Princeton’s Net Zero America failed to acknowledge

Adams Engines™: Design Concepts

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy