5 Comments

  1. So on the heels of “Drill Baby Drill” we have the BP explosion and spill. Then we also have coal mine disaster after coal mine disaster. I expect a highly publicized nuclear incident soon. Hopefully Suzy can prepare appropriate response materials ahead of time.

  2. It is interesting that you bring that up, seeing as there has already been a recent “incident” at the Vermont Yankee reactor. Despite the fact that only very small, harmless amounts of radiation were released and no one was hurt of killed, there is serious talk of shutting down the plant. This would mean that new coal plants would have to be constructed to replace the $100 million worth of electricity created at Vermont Yankee annually.
    On the other hand, despite multiple recent accidents in the fossil fuel industry and many lives lost, there is little consideration of reducing our reliance on dangerous, dirty, limited resources …much less actually shutting down coal plants. There is a double standard at work here that is not based in science or the best interest of the population.
    And, Yes, I am absolutely prepared to defend nuclear energy considering it has, by far, the best record of any energy source in terms of resource management, safety, and cost effectiveness.
    I will continue to support nuclear energy by bringing to light all that clean fission has to offer in a positive way, rather than focusing on unfounded fear, because quite frankly its just a waste of time. Might I suggest you give it a try, Para Noid!

  3. No, I agree with all you’ve said. I just think that these days we’re always being surprised by the news; it’s a good time to expect the unexpected.

  4. There are highly publicised harmless incidents at nuclear plants all the time. No doubt something new will be reported soon.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Japan Steel Works Stock Soars by More Than 8% As China Doubles Its Nuclear Plans

    As a patriotic and competitive American, I am worried about the long term effects of the difference in stimulus investments between my country and China. We spent $3 billion dollars subsidizing the purchase of new automobiles for individual people and are spending an untold amount of money helping other individuals to purchase homes through the…

  • YouTube Video titled "Renewable Energy Solution of the Month – Wind"

    When you watch this video, put on your critical thinking cap and consider the following questions: Are all birds equally important? Just because no power plant operates 100% of the time every year, does that mean that all of them are “intermittent” sources of power? Do you like the scale of the environmental impact pictured…

  • Personal aside – remember Movember & donate generously

    Please remember that this is the month of Movember, a time to help raise funds for organizations that are fighting health issues that are not often discussed – prostate and testicular cancer. Please honor the men in your life. If you have ever wondered how you can say thank you for the information and value…

  • Scott Peterson, VP of Communications for Nuclear Energy Institute, Discusses Used Fuel Commission

    Scott Peterson, the Vice President of Communications for the Nuclear Energy Institute visited with Clean Skies News to talk about his organization’s reactions to the formation of the blue ribbon commission on used nuclear fuel policy. It is heartening to hear an industry spokesman so clearly stating that the industry has accepted the responsibility for…

  • Quotes from 1976 presidential debates

    In a recent post, I mentioned my idea that Jimmy Carter’s anti-nuclear energy policy was a deliberate strategy provided by his handlers and I mentioned my memory of the emphasis placed on his nuclear credentials during the campaign. I did some more digging this morning and came up with some pretty good supporting material for…

  • American Petroleum Institute Chief Economist On Marcellus Shale Opportunities

    On September 23, 2009, John Felmy, the chief economist of the American Petroleum Institute (API) spoke at the Pennsylvania College of Technology in Williamsport, PA about the vast opportunities that the API sees for developing the shale gas that is buried about 6,000 feet below the surface. Warning: Felmy is a self-admitted boring economist, but…