• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Former anti-nuclear activists in UK are part of support for new atomic policy

January 12, 2008 By Rod Adams

Freedom for Fission pointed me to a thought provoking article on the BBC web site deceptively titled Nuclear veterans vow to fight on. Normally, I have at least some sympathy for the fact that writers cannot cover every aspect of a story, but in this case, I have to challenge what the author left out.

First of all, the people in the linked story are not “nuclear veterans”; they are career anti-nuclear professionals who have likely never set foot inside a nuclear power plant. Instead, they have spent their careers being afraid of nuclear power and working hard to spread their fears to others. There is no indication from the article that they have ever spent time in engineering classes, in safety planning meetings, or in operations training. For the author of the story, simply protesting a technology somehow conveys some amount of expertise.

My real beef with the author’s focus is that the article is a “what are they doing now” kind of article that only focuses on actors who are on one side of a great divide. He does not attempt to find anyone from the other side and explain why they are still fighting for the technology. He also misses a wonderful opportunity for real information exchange when he mentions in passing that some of the people who are actually leading the UK government’s current policy shift toward encouraging atomic development were once on the anti-nuclear protesters themselves.

According to the article, the late Robin Cook and Alistair Darling participated in direct action against nuclear power stations in their younger days but switched their opinion as they grew older. The author implies that the shift was for political reasons, but as a reader, I really found myself wondering. The article quotes several of the people who refuse to change their minds, but it does not interview the still living person who apparently learned something that made him switch.

As a lifelong learner, I tend to think that my current opinions, informed by maturity, experience and study, are better than the ones that I held as a young man. I can often share interesting stories about what made me change my mind. (Since I am not a politician, I do not have to call the process of changing my mind “flip-flopping”.)

Here is a quote from an article published by the Independent in March 2007 titled You Ask The Questions: Alistair Darling, Trade and Industry Secretary that provides Alistair Darling’s answer to a direct question about whether Britain needs new nuclear power plants:

The big issue is whether we rule out nuclear power as an option in the future. That’s what we will be consulting on. We face two big and urgent challenges – climate change and ensuring we have secure supplies of energy. The decisions are urgent: at the moment we get about 20 per cent of our electricity from nuclear power and these power stations will be decommissioned over the next 20 years. We have to replace them and if you rule out nuclear the chances are that they will be replaced by gas which is not green and has to be imported from sometimes unstable parts of the world. Of course we must reduce demand and be more efficient and we must increase the amount of renewables. But does it make sense to exclude nuclear which is a low carbon source?

Though I am not a UK resident and only have a passing knowledge of the political scene there, I think that comment shows that Mr. Darling is a man who is driven by reason and logic. In other words, his opinion changed because he learned some things about technology and the world that led him to believe that his youthful opposition to nuclear power was no longer appropriate.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gene Nelson, Ph.D. on Atomic Energy Wells

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy