• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

The Atomic Show #125 – Economic Interests in Environmental Politics

February 1, 2009 By Rod Adams

It not shocking news to discover that “recovering” politicians often lobby their former colleagues. This show about Gore’s testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is just an example.

This week I spent a several hours listening to the first hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee of the current congressional session. Former Vice President Al Gore, the founder of an organization called Alliance for Climate Protection was the only witness during the 2 hour and 50 minute hearing. Watching that hearing, no one would ever know that the former VP is also a partner in Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers a Silicon Valley venture capital firm with significant financial interests in the very topic of conversation – non-nuclear alternatives to fossil fuel energy power production.

This is a matter of collegial privilege offered to a very few.

After watching the hearing and producing a rather extensive blog post about the hearing for Atomic Insights, I happened to choose to listen to NPR Environment Podcast for January 29, 2009. There was an amusing juxtaposition of stories; the first one talked about Gore’s visit to Capitol Hill, the second one was an interview with Ray Lane, also a partner in KPCB, about the need for federal assistance to the alternative energy industry in the fact of the global economic crisis.

None of the NPR correspondents made the connection between Gore and Lane.

It was also amusing to hear Gore explaining to Senator Corker and Senator Isakson, two strong nuclear advocates and former independent businessmen, why he talks down the potential for nuclear power as a tool in the fight to save human civilization against the twin threats of climate change and fossil fuel addiction.

I know that this might sound like I am picking on the former VP, but if I am, it is not because I am on a different political team. I happen to agree with some of the things that he says and stands for.

I just think that he should be more open about his financial interests in ensuring that climate change is recognized as a crisis big enough to force the taxpayers to subsidize the very companies into which he is putting his “private risk capital”. At the same time, I think he needs to do a better job of explaining why the crisis is not big enough to allow the expansion of a proven technology that supplies massive quantities of emission free power already.

His claim is that fission either costs too much or presents too big of a risk of “proliferation” means that he puts those factors higher on the priority list than saving human society from choking on deadly fossil fuel waste.

My interpretation is that fission simply presents too big of a risk to the success of his investments in alternative forms of energy production. None of the projects that KPCB is financing in alternative energy could compete without both a direct boost from the government and unreasonable handcuffs on competitive energy source from that same government.

Update posted Feb 2, 2009 at 0641: Ausra is one of the companies that KPCB has funded. During the hearing, John Kerry, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee specifically mentioned that company, its Las Vegas, NV location and its expansion plans, stating that it was “the future”. I just ran across an article about the company in the San Jose Mercury News dated January 29, 2009, the day after the hearing took place. Here is a quote:

Today, the Palo Alto company says it has responded to the financial crisis by downsizing its goals and now plans to make smaller energy-generation plants and to sell its technology and equipment to utilities and other companies. Ausra’s chief executive said he now doubts the viability of the large-scale solar-thermal segment.

“What a lot of people thought when they went out and signed 500- or 900-megawatt power-purchase agreements was that it was easy to go from a 1-megawatt demo plant to a 900-megawatt project,” said Robert Fishman, Ausra’s chairman, president and CEO. “That’s simply not reality. The finance market will not support it.”

You can also read more about the hearing over at Atomic Insights.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/AtomicShowFiles/tpn_atomic_20090131_125.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 37:18 — 17.1MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Alternative energy, Atomic politics, Economics, Podcast Tagged With: Alternative energy, Atomic Energy, Ausra, Corker, Gore, Isakson, Kerry, NuClear, nuclear fuel recycling

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. R Margolis says

    February 3, 2009 at 12:58 AM

    I wonder if Gore has listened to the classic solar siren song that occurs every time there is a big energy transition. Even when the Greeks were worried about wood supplies, they started talking about “going back to solar”. People need a lot of pushing to get used to a major energy transition.

    Great podcast. Keep up the good work.

  2. Kirk Sorensen says

    February 3, 2009 at 11:19 PM

    Fantastic show Rod–I really enjoyed it and recommend it.

  3. Chuck P. says

    July 29, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    Rod,

    I just listened to show 125 (I’ve been slowly catching up over the last several weeks). BRAVO! This is one of your best efforts. I am bewildered by the lack of intelligent discourse regarding the limitations of “renewables”. The amount of traction Gore gets with the credulous media is amazing. I’m very frustrated by his “one size only” meme. Like you I’m a former submarine officer. I which someone would question him about the small reactors I spent several years operating. They were rated (according to wikipedia) at 16MWth. If Gore really cared about the environment, he would use his considerable clout to promote the REAL solution to climate change instead of simply trying to make a buck.

  4. Rod Adams says

    July 29, 2009 at 3:36 PM

    Chuck – try looking at the situation through slightly different lenses. How do you think Gore would speak if his underlying motive was to sell natural gas and oil plus make some money from government subsidies for his investments in politically acceptable “renewable” energy technologies?

    Take a good hard look at the man, his background, and his lifestyle and ask yourself if he really behaves like a self sacrificing crusader for the environment.

  5. Chuck P. says

    July 29, 2009 at 7:41 PM

    Rod,

    Exactly my point. I believe you have Gore figured out pretty well. My fustration is the pass he seems to get on his conflict of intrest in the matter (conflict of intrest is perhaps too strong a phrase). He was given the Nobel Peace Prize for promoting his company’s products! (Of course, my faith in that body isn’t what it used to be, they gave Yasar Arafat the Peace Prize too…)

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gene Nelson, Ph.D. on Atomic Energy Wells

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy