12 Comments

  1. Interesting press release. It’s interesting that the new HQ for BWXT is Lynchburg, but the PR Manager gave out a Charlotte phone number. Have to be a real geek to notice that! 🙂

  2. So what? My wife lives in Virginia, but has a California phone number for her work. It’s a cell phone.

    Phone number consistency can be more important, particularly when it comes to business, than locality. B&W has been headquartered in Charlotte for a while. Why would it be surprising that people who used to work for B&W would still have a Charlotte number during the transition?

  3. Higher costs?

    Sometimes you get what you pay for. Not having a low-tech boilermaker run your high-tech nuclear business can result in substantial savings that are not at all obvious in a six-paragraph news piece.

  4. A “Pure Play Nuclear Company” may not be a good thing. Am I the only one concerned that, without additional revenue streams/product lines, BWXT might not be able to, in the short term, generate enough revenue to re-invest in bringing mPower to market. When it was part of a larger company, at least theoretically (although it sounds like the investors/CEO wouldn’t let it do this, so as not to reduce the near term profitability of the combined business) the B&W company could have re-invested profits from other markets to help it get through the tough startup period of bringing mPower to market.

  5. BWXT’s main product line was — and still will be — providing services (particularly nuclear fuel) for the military. No need to worry there.

    As far as the larger company goes, Babcock and Wilcox was in bankruptcy because of all of the lawsuits concerning asbestos exposure from the boilers that they had manufactured. The larger company was an albatross for the nuclear-focused business line for many years.

  6. Considering that nuclear power plants are high pressure boilers, the splitting of the boilermaker business from the nuclear business means that BWXT no longer has the depth it would need to be a supplier of commercial nuclear technologies. Sure, nuclear power is special and unique, but nuclear reactors are boilers. The split was not useful.

  7. It is fairly simple for the new company to contract with the old one for boiler designs. A debt free company with a built in cash flow business and a leading design sounds like a good bet to me.

  8. OK … I see one MBA, I see two MBAs. What was your point again?

    Do you really think that one person’s bachelor’s degree from many years ago is going to make the difference between the success and the failure of a company? Is that how shallow your thinking is?!

  9. @michael scarangella

    BWXT includes the group in Cambridge that makes the pressure vessels and steam generators for nuclear plants.

  10. Mr. “Galt” – Er … Excuse me, I’m the one who’s trolling?!

    Mr. Pot, I’d like to introduce you to Mr. Kettle. You might find him a little reflectively challenged.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • NEI Energy Markets Report

    The NEI Nuclear Notes Blog has started publishing links to the weekly NEI Energy Markets report. Here is the description from the end of the report describing the source of the report and the intended audience. Energy Markets Report is produced on a weekly basis for the nuclear industry’s financial community by The Nuclear Energy…

  • Nuclear Power and "The Media"

    During my nearly thirty years of being a nuke, I have participated in hundreds of conversations about the basis for the widespread misunderstandings about the technology that are held by the general public. A variety of possible causes have been proposed over sodas, beers and glasses of wine including weaknesses in a public education system…

  • PBMR project update – December 6, 2005

    South Africa’s PBMR (Pty) Ltd has signed two contracts with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of Japan. One contract – worth $10 Million US – is for the long lead time items and forgings required for the Core Barrel Assembly for the demonstration PBMR project planned for the Koeberg site in Western South Africa. The second contract…

  • The Nuclear Power Option in Bangladesh

    The New Nation, which bills itself as “Bangladesh’s independent news source” published an editorial on June 19, 2006 titled The nuclear power option. It provides a very reasonable comparison between various ways of producing the power needed to help raise Bangladesh out of poverty. I admire the concluding paragraph: Therefore, the case for Bangladesh to…