12 Comments

  1. Interesting press release. It’s interesting that the new HQ for BWXT is Lynchburg, but the PR Manager gave out a Charlotte phone number. Have to be a real geek to notice that! 🙂

  2. So what? My wife lives in Virginia, but has a California phone number for her work. It’s a cell phone.

    Phone number consistency can be more important, particularly when it comes to business, than locality. B&W has been headquartered in Charlotte for a while. Why would it be surprising that people who used to work for B&W would still have a Charlotte number during the transition?

  3. Higher costs?

    Sometimes you get what you pay for. Not having a low-tech boilermaker run your high-tech nuclear business can result in substantial savings that are not at all obvious in a six-paragraph news piece.

  4. A “Pure Play Nuclear Company” may not be a good thing. Am I the only one concerned that, without additional revenue streams/product lines, BWXT might not be able to, in the short term, generate enough revenue to re-invest in bringing mPower to market. When it was part of a larger company, at least theoretically (although it sounds like the investors/CEO wouldn’t let it do this, so as not to reduce the near term profitability of the combined business) the B&W company could have re-invested profits from other markets to help it get through the tough startup period of bringing mPower to market.

  5. BWXT’s main product line was — and still will be — providing services (particularly nuclear fuel) for the military. No need to worry there.

    As far as the larger company goes, Babcock and Wilcox was in bankruptcy because of all of the lawsuits concerning asbestos exposure from the boilers that they had manufactured. The larger company was an albatross for the nuclear-focused business line for many years.

  6. Considering that nuclear power plants are high pressure boilers, the splitting of the boilermaker business from the nuclear business means that BWXT no longer has the depth it would need to be a supplier of commercial nuclear technologies. Sure, nuclear power is special and unique, but nuclear reactors are boilers. The split was not useful.

  7. It is fairly simple for the new company to contract with the old one for boiler designs. A debt free company with a built in cash flow business and a leading design sounds like a good bet to me.

  8. OK … I see one MBA, I see two MBAs. What was your point again?

    Do you really think that one person’s bachelor’s degree from many years ago is going to make the difference between the success and the failure of a company? Is that how shallow your thinking is?!

  9. @michael scarangella

    BWXT includes the group in Cambridge that makes the pressure vessels and steam generators for nuclear plants.

  10. Mr. “Galt” – Er … Excuse me, I’m the one who’s trolling?!

    Mr. Pot, I’d like to introduce you to Mr. Kettle. You might find him a little reflectively challenged.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • New York Times Hyping Unfounded Radiation Fears Associated With Dental Cone Beam Scanners

    On November 22, 2010, the New York Times published another one of those “protect the children” articles that quotes professional critics, plays on fears and perpetrates the journalistic assumption that the general public should be protected from math and numbers at all costs. The article, titled Radiation Worries for Children in Dentists’ Chairs describes how…

  • Response To A Pro-Coal Troll Who Hates It When I Refer to Coal As Dirty

    You have to develop a thick skin in order to operate a blog that covers controversial topics like energy. On Atomic Insights, there is a community of participants that seem to enjoy the discussions and commentary, but there are a few contributors that can get downright nasty in their prose and their attacks on my…

  • Does nuclear power split environmentalists?

    A couple of days ago, Marc Fisher, who operates a blog titled Raw Fisher at the Washington Post, published a commentary titled Mixed greens: How nuclear power splits environmentalists. This post has attracted a significant string of well-reasoned (and a few goofy) comments. I encourage you to visit, read the thread and contribute if you…

  • Beyond Fossil Fools – New, Must Read Book by Joe Shuster

    I have a new hero, even though I have not yet read his book. Joe Shuster is a retired entrepreneur who is spending $200,000 of his own money to promote the idea that the United States needs to build about 800 new nuclear power plants in order to stretch supplies of fossil fuels far into…

  • Free Idaho blog repots on nuclear interest in Idaho by a company owned by Warren Buffett

    BillH over on freeinidaho.com posted a very interesting comment about recent interest by MidAmerican Nuclear Energy Co., a subsidiary of the Des Moines, Iowa-based MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. in some land in Idaho. The holding company has electricity distribution companies in neighboring states and certainly has the financial resources for building nuclear power plants. Go…