4 Comments

  1. Happy to see that you’ve discovered this nice BBC video from my tweet, Rod! It’s always an honor to be retweeted and now even blogged by “Atomic” Rod!

    Happy Nuke Year!

    Luca Bertagnolio
    aka Futuro Nucleare

  2. Fail poor science
    Gamma spectrometry, lead castle and a 2 inch sodium iodide thallium doped scintillation crystal and your find a world of radioactivity in Brazil nuts.
    Small amount of uranium/thorium,radium etc

  3. Using a geiger counter on food is poor science as the instrument isn’t suitable for food radioactivity detection unless highly contaminated.

    Run the sample in a lead castle with HPGe or sodium iodide detector and your find NORM.

    Far better to explain NORM and the fact it is everywhere, than as the video presented makes out no radioactivity-when it should state that any Norm is either at background level or below geiger counter detection.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Realistic dose limits and better predictive models will help Fukushima recovery

    World Nuclear News published an article titled Consistency required for Fukushima return that mentions several topics worth increased discussion. It mentions the report recently completed by the IAEA that complimented Japan on its efforts to decontaminate areas that were affected by the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station radioactive material releases. Then it went on to…

  • Unshielded radiation levels inside Fukushima unit 2 are extremely high

    NEWS FLASH: Radiation levels measured inside the containment and shielding of a damaged nuclear reactor are HIGH. That is about as unexpected as finding out that the temperatures inside a coal-fired furnace are high enough to cause instant death to any unprotected living creature, including human beings. There is absolutely no reason for the public…

  • UCS is guilty of harming humans by reinforcing fear mongering

    Correction: (Posted at 6:43 on 6/16/2013) I made a boneheaded error in the below computation and dropped an important prefix in my units. That error resulted in my final number being off by a factor of 1000; I wrote 0.001 mrem when it should have been 0.001 rem. I apologize for the math error. I…

  • Detectable radiation versus dangerous radiation

    There is no doubt that ionizing radiation at high enough levels can cause illness or even death. It is, after all, a form of energy that has the ability to do work. Anything that can do work and move physical objects – including tiny physical objects like chromosomes – can also do damage. However, since…

  • Romance of Radium – How did our relationship with radioactive material sour?

    Note – This post was initially published on February 23, 2013. After attending the ANS President’s Special Session about the way we should communicate about radiation, I thought it would be worth repeating. Sometimes, we need to look outside of our immediate time and place to find “best practices” that we should emulate. Hitting road…

  • Berkeley’s institutional fear of low dose radiation traced to a suffocated rat

    While learning more about the effect that John Gofman and Arthur Tamplin had on radiation protection regulations, I found an important story to share. Excessive fear of low dose radiation among University of California Berkeley (UCB) researchers that were early pioneers in radiation and radioactive isotopes was directly influenced by a single dead rat. The…