5 Comments

  1. Good Episode – Good overall summary of present conditions and it appears positive.

    Suggestion – The Russian company Rosatom Nuclear seems to have quite a world wide presence. I checked the podcasts and didn’t see anything about them since episode 54. To be honest, I didn’t go back any further. I’m just suggesting that some aspect of this company may be worth an episode of some sort. It could be timely since they have had some peripheral involvement with the horrible war in Ukraine.

  2. Yes, the Russian government is FINANCING and building large PWRs with risky (bad credit) customers from Bangladesh to Egypt. USA prefers to just give the money away without building the infrastructure.

  3. The prospect of SMRs suddenly appearing all over the energy-poor world is very attractive from a decarbonisation point of view. However the proliferation police need reassurance that no one could run their brand-new pure-uranium fuel for only as long as it takes to breed up a small quantity of Pu239 before it becomes denatured by Pu240. The possibility could be averted by alloying in enough recycled fuel to ensure there is always a denaturing level of Pu240.

  4. @Micheal scarangella

    Agree. Many influential people in the US seem to prefer giving money to poor countries and poor people who live in the UD instead of investing in helping them become more independent and productive.

    That seems especially true when it comes to nuclear energy.

    I can’t imagine why. Perhaps others can explain.

  5. Thanks Rod for inviting Dr. Bilbao y Leon of WNA to the podcast for
    an excellent interview. Regarding responses to inaccurate claims of
    the nonexistence of small modular reactors and nonexistence of their
    testing, here’s an interesting news report by WNA on China’s recent
    demonstration of a two-module gas-cooled pebble bed reactor prototype:

    Article: China’s demonstration HTR-PM reaches full power
    Source: World Nuclear News, 09 Dec 2022
    URL: https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/China-s-demonstration-HTR-PM-reaches-full-power

    So as people in the US argue that 100% renewable grids are
    the only way to fight climate change, that pebble-bed nuclear
    reactor designs are inherently too expensive, and that SMRs
    generate too much nuclear waste, I think that we’d be better
    off spending less time on these debates and putting more of
    our own resources into learning by doing, starting with facts,
    science, and STEM education.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #173 – Nuclear communicators bid goodnight to Hurricane Irene

    Hurricane Irene took a path up the east coast of the United States that put a large population at risk from heavy rains, storm surges, and high winds. Before the storm there were stories about the fact that among all of the other parts of the infrastructure that might be affected, there were a number…

  • Go Nuclear – Message from Murray Miles

    A few days ago, I published the text of a speech given by Murray Miles to The Keese School of Continuing Education. At the time I published that speech, I had not been able to contact Mr. Miles to obtain his permission. Since that time, I have made contact and begun what I hope will…

  • Mr. President – Ike would recommend the nuclear option for energy policy

    Dear President Obama: I was heartened to hear that you have put fighting climate change near the top of your “to do” list during your second term. It is time for you to dig through your memory banks, your pile of correspondence and the lessons you are learning by studying Eisenhower’s presidency to realize that…

  • Areva Inc.’s Mike Rencheck discusses his company’s business outlook

    Platts Energy Week recently interviewed Mike Rencheck, the CEO of Areva Inc., about the company’s outlook on the US nuclear energy market. During the interview, Rencheck talked about Areva’s business serving the operational needs of the existing fleet of nuclear power plants, its involvement with plant uprates, the Mixed Oxide (MOX) project at the Savannah…

  • Misunderstanding the “questioning attitude” that infuses nuclear culture

    The US House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on April 6, 2011 billed as “The U.S. Government Response to the Nuclear Power Plant Incident in Japan”. During the hearing, Dr. Edwin Lyman of the UCS and some of his allies in Congress made a point of discussing some internal emails from regulators at…

  • Journalism reviewer “frustrated” by AP series on nuclear plant aging issues

    The Columbia Journalism Review has published an article titled A Frustrating AP Series on Nuclear Safety that analyses the four part series of “investigative” reports published during June of 2011. Here is an example quote from the article: But the AP series, while it tackles a critically important public policy issue, suffers from lapses in…