5 Comments

  1. Thanks for having me on the show. I hope your listeners enjoy it and learn a little bit more about Deep Isolation and nuclear waste disposal.

  2. Ultimate disposal of high level waste is irrelevant – the status quo (ISFSI) is adequate – Deep Isolation focuses on a technical solution for a red herring/ distraction/ tangential issue presented by antinuclear opposition. Locating casks or little PWRs deep into bore holes does not improve any figure of merit in waste management or power operations. We really need to elevate HGR’s “practical vs. academic reactor” essay to the status of truism or logical fallacy considering the CONSTANT roll-out of ‘advanced’ nuclear concepts pitched by hobbyists and posers.

  3. @Michael Scarangella

    From a technical perspective, ISFSI is fine.

    It has not convinced enough people to make it adequate from a political point of view. The current payments from the taxpayer funded settlement fund total almost as much as the NRC’s entire budget. There are still plenty of nuclear industry experts pressing for a permanent solution to be implemented – even if it is not heavily used in the foreseeable future.

    No comment regarding little PWRs at the bottom of deep boreholes.

  4. Rod

    You’re welcome. Please check by here periodically during the next couple of weeks to see if there are any comments or questions that you want to address.

  5. In my own little way, I have been using Deep Isolation as a reply when people ask about Nuclear Waste. I have linked their website in replies and encouraged people to consider this. While dry cask storage is fine for now, in many places I have hoped for years to see nuclear deployed, the bore hole solution is better because of the out of sight out of mind effect. It greatly reduces the ability for Anti-Nuclear protestors to grandstand. I also like it because it can be implemented in nearly any location around the world, if not directly on-site then within a short distance. I like the ability to retrieve the rods for possible future use. The simplicity is very appealing and I bet technical solutions would rapidly improve the equipment (tweaking the designs) if there was a large order book and several installations testing the actual conditions.

    Regarding mini PWR’s I would really like the ability to use the slightly used fuel to heat a swimming pool. But then, I am far more relaxed about radiation than most. A pool with a storage cistern to the side about 30 feet down and using convection to move the water would give a long term solution to cold winter days when you want to swim. Well if dreams were horses, beggars would ride. On the other hand, there might be a way to use the decay heat generated in that bore hole…

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #190 – Nuclear plant performance during Hurricane Sandy

    There are 34 nuclear reactors located in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy. Of those, 7 were shutdown for planned maintenance. Three units tripped due to disturbances on the grid or issues with one of their redundant cooling systems. The other 24 remained operational and supplied as much power as the grid could accept. On Sunday,…

  • Atomic Show #324 – Jay Hakes, Author of Presidents and the Planet

    Jay Hakes, an accomplished author and historian, visited the Atomic Show to talk about his recently published book, Presidents and the Planet: Climate Change Science and Politics from Eisenhower to Bush. Sometimes referred to as “the untold story of climate change,” Hake’s book is an enlightening jaunt through a history discovered during long days in…

  • The Atomic Show #027 – Nuclear power for remote areas

    Small nuclear power plants can deliver the benefits of electrical power to the 2 billion people that currently do not have access to electricity. Shane and I were inspired by an article titled “Nuclear to the rescue” by Paul Driessen who also wrote “Eco-Imperialism: Green Power Black Death.”. I had posted a comment about the…

  • The Atomic Show #058 – Uranium on NYMEX, Water use by reactors

    Shane and Rod discuss uranium futures markets new to the New York Mercantile Exchange, water consumption by thermal power plants, scaling reactors to fit various markets and locations Shane found some good follow on information relating to our uranium availability story a few weeks ago and listener John asked some questions that provided some good…

  • Atomic Show #254 – Don’t let a crisis go to waste

    Rachel Pritzker and Ben Heard, two skilled communicators that have recognized the immense gift to humanity represented by the tightly packed power inside uranium and thorium nuclei, joined me in a terrific discussion about effectively communicating the awesome story of nuclear energy. It should be apparent by now that the US nuclear industry is facing…

  • The Atomic Show #032 – Uranium mineral collector – Ruth Sponsler

    Chat with a uranium mineral collector and nuclear power supporter Ruth Sponsler is an amateur mineral collector, a resident of the beautiful mountains of North Carolina and an active supporter of the use of nuclear energy. She blogs at We Support Lee. Shane and I invited her onto the show to talk about her unusual…