Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 Comments

  1. It is very difficult to find out the cost of this reactor. Nuclear needs to compete on COST!!!

    I also wonder if MMR could follow the same process with the NRC that Oklo did?

  2. Commercial products need to compete on costs. This is a research tool that has many uses and produces numerous non existent capabilities for the university. Initial cost is just one of several measures of effectiveness.

  3. Ya, I thought you might have overlooked the possibility which is why I was sure you needed to be reminded… (grin).

    I did notice that expensive helium was being used rather than nitrogen. I wonder what the actual efficiency difference is between the two gases?

    I really like the MMR design that separates the nuclear heat generation from the various uses of that heat. I love the use of the Molten Salt for the transition. The use of LEU that is almost HEU is fantastic giving a 20 year run time between refueling.

    I especially like that the reactor will produce industrial level outputs in various directions. Brilliant!

    The fact that the controls will be aimed at a rotating student staff gives a lot of hope that the reactors can be used in places that are marginal or have a corrupt government or lower educational level.

    The type of fuel is a perfect fit for deepisolation disposal.

  4. That’s a very fair point on cost for this research reactor. At the same time, this research reactor is great advertising for Ultra Safe Nuclear and for students who would want to implement their tech in industrial applications. Future costs will be a key factor in the ability to make sales.

    I will love to hear if they need to qualify the TRISO fuel for several years in the same way that the graphic ball style TRISO has been undergoing testing. In other words, can they deliver the fuel?

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #325 – Marco Visscher – The Power of Nuclear

    After many years as an independent journalist with an antinuclear bent, Marco Visscher began questioning his long-held beliefs. He realized that the accepted alternatives to fossil fuel were not actually reducing fossil fuel use so much as they were limiting the rate at which it was increasing. He began acknowledging that nuclear energy was a…

  • Will North Anna 3 be lead ESBWR?

    There is a growing perception that the Nuclear Renaissance in the U.S. is dead, killed off forever by low natural gas prices. Some members of the American Nuclear Society (ANS) are not so sure. At the June 7 President’s Reception for the 2015 ANS annual meeting, there were several intriguing discussions about new projects that…

  • The Atomic Show #079 – Ft St Vrain, energy comparisons, UK nuclear decision

    John Wheeler, Kelly Taylor, Robert Margolis, and Michael Stuart visit with Rod Adams about a variety of topics including Ft. St. Vrain, energy comparisons, energy price inflation, and the recent UK government decision to encourage new nuclear power plants. First of all, I apologize for the sound quality. I goofed something up with the settings…

  • Atomic Show #236 – Local Nuclear NW, NE, Canada

    On March 30, 2015, I gathered a few of my pro-nuclear blogging friends together for a chat about recent events and activity in three separate areas, the Pacific Northwest, the US Northeast, and the eastern provinces of Canada. We also chatted about recent budget hearings for the DOE and the NRC and the way the…

  • Atomic Show #300 – Dr. Lindsay Krall, “Nuclear Waste from Small Modular Reactors”

    Dr. Lindsay Krall is a geochemist currently working on projects characterizing the behavior of radioactive isotopes that will eventually be stored in a deep geologic repository being designed in Sweden for construction within the next decade. During a three year post doctoral period she worked under a MacArthur Foundation grant program to study the projected…