9 Comments

  1. We Australian advocates are obviously proud of our research reactor. I’m looking forward to seeing the supply of this crucial “workhorse isotope” (great term!) increase in an unfolding environment of healthy competition as our own output is set to ramp up substantially.

  2. @Oscar Archer

    Due to the lengthy trip required by even the fastest airliners between your home and mine, I see little competition between us in Mo-99/Tc-99.

    The material has such a short half-life that production facilities on opposite sides of the globe suffer too much decay during the transit time to directly compete with each other.

    I see far more opportunity for cooperation vice competition in this case.

  3. I’m not sure that ANSTO (the owners of the OPAL reactor in Australia) wouldn’t see this as competition. Today they put out a news release highlighting the Mo-99 that gets shipped from Australia to the USA, and ANSTO would love to increase exports in the future. Given how quickly the global market for radiopharmaceuticals is growing I think that there is plenty of space for many suppliers around the world though.

  4. It is a very exciting project. I hope it works out well for them. It will certainly be wonderful for the community.

  5. This looks like a great excuse to develop ballistic cargo rockets. 🙂

    The stuff that’s being done in amateur high power rocketry is astounding at times.

  6. This is indeed an exciting project and clearly has a high probability of success from a technical perspective as it is based upon existing proven technology. My understanding is that the project is based upon the construction of 2 reactors and a processing facility which is an excellent strategy from a security of supply perspective but my guess is that it will be extremely costly and construction time will be long (>5yrs).

    As a matter of interest Mo-99 from NTP in South Africa, IRE in Belgium and Ansto in Australia is shipped to the USA on a weekly basis and during the annual Canadian NRU outage a significant portion of the USA demand is supplied by these 3 companies.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #259 – David Schumacher The New Fire Movie

    David Schumacher is a filmmaker who was inspired to learn more about nuclear energy at a Wired-sponsored event in 2011. That event took place soon after the Fukushima event captured widespread media attention. During the Wired gathering, he heard Bill Gates talk about his investments in TerraPower and his excitement in being involved in the…

  • Atomic Show #320 – Magnus Mori, Urenco

    Urenco is one of the few companies in the world that enriches uranium. It’s one of an even smaller group of enrichers that aren’t owned by the Russian, Chinese or Iranian governments. It plays a key role in the western world’s nuclear fuel cycle. That role became even more important after February, 2022. With the…

  • Atomic Show #103 – PBMR Engineering Contract

    Kelly Taylor, Rod Adams and Joe Montague discuss nuclear news, including PBMR’s announced EPC contract Kelly Taylor, Joe Montague and I meet to chat about PBMR, nuclear events and nuclear industry history. Hope you enjoy the show. If you want to find out more about careers in the nuclear industry, please visit nuclearenergycareers.com. Podcast: Play…

  • Atomic Show #319 – Juliann Edwards, The Nuclear Company

    The Nuclear Company exited a period of operating in “stealth mode” about a month ago. That exit was sufficiently well planned and executed that it is likely that Atomic Insights readers have already heard of the company. The Nuclear Company was incorporated a year ago. Its founding team has been working diligently to build the…

  • Dirty Bomb Advice from an Expert – Larry Grimm

    With the recent frantic coverage of the GAO’s “sting” of Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing procedures, the phrase “dirty bomb” is again being thrown about in the popular press. I thought it was time to make the following piece readily available in another location. You might be able to find a similar document somewhere else on…

  • Familiarity breeds understanding and acceptance of radiation

    After reading Dr. Jerry Cuttler’s paper about the need to restore the basis of radiation regulations to tolerance doses, an Atomic Insights reader provided the link to the above video posted by bionerd23 on YouTube. It is one of several informative videos that she has shared with the world about her explorations to increase both…