9 Comments

  1. We Australian advocates are obviously proud of our research reactor. I’m looking forward to seeing the supply of this crucial “workhorse isotope” (great term!) increase in an unfolding environment of healthy competition as our own output is set to ramp up substantially.

  2. @Oscar Archer

    Due to the lengthy trip required by even the fastest airliners between your home and mine, I see little competition between us in Mo-99/Tc-99.

    The material has such a short half-life that production facilities on opposite sides of the globe suffer too much decay during the transit time to directly compete with each other.

    I see far more opportunity for cooperation vice competition in this case.

  3. I’m not sure that ANSTO (the owners of the OPAL reactor in Australia) wouldn’t see this as competition. Today they put out a news release highlighting the Mo-99 that gets shipped from Australia to the USA, and ANSTO would love to increase exports in the future. Given how quickly the global market for radiopharmaceuticals is growing I think that there is plenty of space for many suppliers around the world though.

  4. It is a very exciting project. I hope it works out well for them. It will certainly be wonderful for the community.

  5. This looks like a great excuse to develop ballistic cargo rockets. 🙂

    The stuff that’s being done in amateur high power rocketry is astounding at times.

  6. This is indeed an exciting project and clearly has a high probability of success from a technical perspective as it is based upon existing proven technology. My understanding is that the project is based upon the construction of 2 reactors and a processing facility which is an excellent strategy from a security of supply perspective but my guess is that it will be extremely costly and construction time will be long (>5yrs).

    As a matter of interest Mo-99 from NTP in South Africa, IRE in Belgium and Ansto in Australia is shipped to the USA on a weekly basis and during the annual Canadian NRU outage a significant portion of the USA demand is supplied by these 3 companies.

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Atomic Show #209 – Nuclear energy conference reports

    The month of November is chock full of nuclear energy related conferences. I was fortunate enough to attend four informative and professionally engaging events. Unfortunately that left little time for gathering friends together to produce a new Atomic Show podcast. This is a downpayment on remedying that situation; during the show preps I realized it…

  • Atomic Show #200 – Celebrating atomic communicators

    On March 9, 2006, Shane Brown and I recorded the first episode of The Atomic Show. We formatted the show as a couple of geeks chatting about atomic energy and published it on Cameron Reilly’s The Podcast Network. On March 17, 2013, I hosted and recorded Atomic Show #200 as a roundtable discussion that included…

  • Atomic Show Bonus Audio – Ben Heard’s Answers to Audience Questions

    On November 12, 2014, Ben Heard, the publisher of Decarbonise SA, delivered a talk titled “Beyond our Shores: A visual world tour exploring Australia’s nuclear responsibilities” at Brisbane City Hall. It was part of the Brisbane Global Café, an international thought leadership event leading into the G20 meeting in 2014. Ben’s talk was recorded and…

  • The Atomic Show #096 – Bonne Posma, Founder, Liquid Coal Inc.

    Bonne Posma wants to use heat from atomic reactors as part of a process of cleanly converting coal into a liquid hydrocarbon – either diesel fuel or jet fuel depending on the market demands. Bonne Posma is a serial entrepreneur whose latest company is called Liquid Coal, Inc.. He has developed a concept for using…