Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. These three shows were awesome. Thanks to you and Mr. Haroldsen for this bit of very significant history. Changed the world, it did,.

  2. Thanks for these shows. They remind me I really should get more from my father about his work at Chalk River in the 1950s. He has mentioned what he saw of the NRX incident.

  3. Jim and Reese:

    Glad you enjoyed the Ray Haroldsen interviews. I thoroughly enjoyed chatting with Ray – I love getting the story directly from people who were there. Too often our histories focus on just the “leaders” or decision makers. Sometimes the perspective that those people bring has too many filters to be very interesting or truthful.

    Jim – I would love to talk with your dad. Do you think he would be interested in sharing his experiences? The Chalk River NRX incident had a long term influence on the development of nuclear power in the United States.

    The effort by the US Navy nuclear reactor program to assist in the clean-up was, after all, one of the very few times that Jimmy Carter had any real exposure to information about nuclear energy outside of a nuclear power school classroom. From what I can gather, he spent a little time in anti-C’s and that made a lasting impression on him.

  4. Great shows. Thanks to Ray for taking the time to share his stories. It is good to record these stories while we can. I will be happy if you two do 10-20 shows.

Similar Posts

  • The Atomic Show #023 – Energy Geopolitics

    Shane and I start with a lengthy and informative discussion about saturation diving, a technique that allows humans to operate in deep water for weeks at a time. This technique is often a part of off-shore oil drilling and production and is one of the many reasons that there are high costs associated with that…

  • Atomic Show #211 – Happy Nuke Year 2014

    On January 1, 2014, I asked several nuclear communicators to join me for a discussion about highlights of 2013 and predictions for 2013. We had a lively discussion about the change in the conversation about nuclear energy stimulated by the release of Pandora’s Promise, the impact of the court decision telling the NRC to restart…

  • Atomic Show #325 – Marco Visscher – The Power of Nuclear

    After many years as an independent journalist with an antinuclear bent, Marco Visscher began questioning his long-held beliefs. He realized that the accepted alternatives to fossil fuel were not actually reducing fossil fuel use so much as they were limiting the rate at which it was increasing. He began acknowledging that nuclear energy was a…

  • Atomic Show #187 – Women In Nuclear (US WIN) 2012

    During the period from July 15-18 2012, more than 440 nuclear professionals attended the annual U. S. Women In Nuclear (US WIN) conference held in Orlando, FL. I spoke to three of the attendees – Julie Ezold, Sandy DePirro, and Savannah Fitzwater – about the conference and about the organization. The women work in three…

  • Atomic Show #196 – Atomic Optimists

    On Sunday, February 17, 2013, a group of five nuclear energy professionals gathered to share their thoughts about the current state of the atomic energy business. Participants included: Margaret Harding (@M2harding), 4 Factor Consulting Meredith Angwin (@yes_VY), Yes Vermont Yankee Andrea Jennetta (@NuclearBuzz), Fuel Cycle Week and I Dig Uranium Cal Abel (@cal_abel), PhD candidate…

  • Atomic Show #352 – John Wagner, Director, Idaho National Laboratory

    The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is in one of its busiest periods since the 1950s-late 1960s when it hosted the construction of 52 test, special purpose and demonstration nuclear reactors. Back when it was called the National Reactor Testing Station (1948-1974) it played a major role in today’s operating fleet of nuclear reactors, both commercial…