• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Where is Hyperion Power Generation headed now?

September 20, 2011 By Rod Adams

Hyperion Power Generation has been one of the more interesting and vocal companies in the small modular reactor (SMR) business during the past few years. I have attended a number of conferences and meetings at which John “Grizz” Deal and/or his sister Deborah Blackwell have been featured speakers or the centers of interested crowds in the hallways.

I interviewed Grizz Deal for The Atomic Show in August 2008 and followed up with an update for The Atomic Show in January 2010. I have been keeping up with the company’s progress, but have not seen or heard much in the past six months.

A couple of days ago, however, I received an update via LinkedIn that Grizz had a new job as the CEO of a company called IX Power (pronounced as “nine power”). I got in touch with Grizz yesterday to find out what had happened to his position as CEO of Hyperion.

Not surprisingly, he was not able to tell me much, since he is under both non-disclosure and non-disparagement agreements. He told me that he was excited about the opportunity to work with technologies that could be made in America and exported without getting permission from multiple export control offices. He agreed that it sometimes seemed that those offices worked under rules specifically designed to discourage US job creation in energy game changing technology. As we agreed during our conversation, that has been the attitude of the US government with regard to nuclear energy related products for quite some time.

During the conversation he mentioned that he and Deborah were still committed to their joint mission of building systems that can deliver both reliable electricity and fresh water to places where those important commodities that we take for granted are virtually unobtainable. He invited me to visit IXPower.com to learn more about their new company, its team and its mission.

One thing that jumped out at me on the “About” page was that virtually every executive that was a part of the founding team at Hyperion seemed to now be a part of IX Power. It will be interesting to see how that migration affects the prospects of both Hyperion and IX Power.

Related Posts

  • Small Reactors, Safety Culture, Safe Design, and Lessons Learned From SL-1
  • Second Annual Nuclear Construction Summit - Organized by Nuclear Energy Insider
  • Platts Small Modular Reactor Meeting - First Day Observations
  • Science Friday Segment on Innovative New Nuclear Projects - Including Mini Nuclear Power Plants Like Hyperion

Filed Under: Small Nuclear Power Plants, Smaller reactors

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Daniel says

    September 20, 2011 at 7:17 AM

    The water quotas between Canada and US are going thru rough negotiations. In Beijing a barrel of water goes for 437$. The US only pays Canada 28$ per barrel. Next wars will be fought over water. Mark my words.

  2. Daniel says

    September 20, 2011 at 7:20 AM

    Water, the blue gold and the provinces of Canada have more than 20 percent of drinking water supplies on the planet.

  3. DV82XL says

    September 20, 2011 at 7:50 AM

    Excuse me while I yawn. This group has been all smoke and no fire for years now. As well they are not in a position to compete with Toshiba or Babcock & Wilcox in this field; the pockets of the later two are just too deep.

    While I do support the notion that small enterprise should be able to enter the nuclear reactor market, the fact is that the regulatory atmosphere makes it almost impossible to make headway. Large corporations can afford to wait it out while they work the system, smaller entities cannot.

    • George Carty says

      September 20, 2011 at 8:20 AM

      Why don’t they build the prototype in a country with less draconian regulations?

      • John Englert says

        September 20, 2011 at 8:28 AM

        Probably because the export rules wont allow them to take the tech outside the US. The HPM is based on a Los Alamos concept.

      • Gregg Lewis says

        December 9, 2011 at 10:59 PM

        Perhaps the technology originated at Los Alamos National Labs and regulations won’t allow it to be taken out of the country

  4. Daniel says

    September 20, 2011 at 8:30 AM

    How much electricity would be required from such a reactors to make water and how much electricity would then be leftover to sell on the market?

    • Nick P. says

      September 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM

      Daniel:

      If done correctly you wouldn’t need any of the reactors electricity except for pumping maybe. The waste heat from the reactor would be more than sufficient to drive a desalination system.

  5. Daniel says

    September 20, 2011 at 6:26 PM

    Well, Rod was looking for excitement in liaison with nuclear. The world is very thirsty (some are actually dying) and the US is in a net deficit of drinking water and must import enormous quantities.

    I sincerely think that there is a niche market for SMRs: energy and drinking water. This is how I would position this technology.

    Developed countries and the third world should line up and get the frigging message.

    • Joel Riddle says

      September 21, 2011 at 10:54 AM

      The key is for people to realize that the nuclear energy systems will have an exceedingly low chance of actually contaminating the water (which is obvious to people who actually know about nuclear power).

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gene Nelson, Ph.D. on Atomic Energy Wells

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy