One Comment

  1. Gotta separate the philosophically against, the medically against, and the anarchist against and tear down down the fear-based rational of the most seemingly reasonable party — the Meds. They show up with no-rad-is-safe-rad doctors in tow, you show up with doctors and rad-treatment patients; they show up with sham engineers, you show up with engineers and records and global studies on slideshows. Educating people at these forums instead of trying to persuade them with empty-handed assurances. Don’t ignore Fukushima — drag out the elephant in the room at the get-go (even if it seems unrelated — it’s feeding fears there!) and chart-up the zero casualties and zero-public damage and virtually nil rad exposure and harm COMPARED with the ravages and aliments of other energy sources. Compare – Compare, Compare always! Relating number crunching stats is great for engineers, but comparing hazards and safety streaks is one non-techie language most understand!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Meredith Angwin with Pat McDonald on Vote for Vermont

    Meredith Angwin, who blogs at Yes Vermont Yankee and Northwest Clean Energy, was recently invited to talk with Pat McDonald on her television show called Vote for Vermont: Listening Beyond the Sound Bites. Angwin and McDonald covered a number of topics during the conversation. Meredith explained how we safely store used nuclear fuel, why some…

  • Nuclear professional explains why he strongly reacts to antinuclear statements

    This post originated as a comment buried deep in a thread that already includes more than 100 comments. It clearly explains why nuclear energy professionals can become rather abrupt when engaging in conversations about energy with people opposed to nuclear energy that claim to be energy policy experts. That is especially true in cases where…

  • Richard Lester’s “A Roadmap for U.S. Nuclear Energy Innovation”

    Dr. Richard Lester, the Japan Steel Industry Professor and Associate Provost for International Activities at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), published a thought and discussion provoking piece titled A Roadmap for U.S. Nuclear Energy Innovation in the Winter 2016 edition of Issues in Science and Technology, the quarterly policy journal of the National Academy…

  • The Atomic Show #51 – Uranium – interesting history and politics

    We’re back after a couple of weeks off. The atomic geeks chat about uranium, which has an interesting history in politics, discovery and economics. Uranium is as common as tin and can be found in measurable quantities almost anywhere in the world. Its price often varies by several hundred percent over short periods of time,…

  • Virginia Loves Nuclear But Hates Uranium – Why?

    Virginia may be the only state in the U.S. with a law creating a public-private partnership structure whose mission is to strengthen and promote its nuclear energy and technology industries. There are two components of the partnership, the Virginia Nuclear Energy Consortium Authority (VNECA) and the Virginia Nuclear Energy Consortium (VNEC), which is a private,…

  • Engaging anonymous antinuclear commenters

    Engineer-Poet, a frequent commenter here on Atomic Insights, made a suggestion that sucked me into an interesting, but frustrating discussion on TruthDig. EP and I have been exchanging thoughts long enough that he might have realized that I would get hooked. I think he felt lonely as a pronuclear poster in that particular forum and…