• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

The Atomic Show #167 – Jeff Merrifield – AP1000 Design Certification Application

May 28, 2011 By Rod Adams

The topic of this podcast is the status of the design certification application for the Westinghouse AP1000, the system that has been chosen for about half of all of the new nuclear power plant projects that are currently planned in the United States.

Last week, the Chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued a press release indicating that the commission had determined that there were “technical issues” that must be resolved before a final design certification rule can be issued for the current iteration of the plant design.

Westinghouse has responded to publicity that resulted from that press release with a press release of its own, detailing its position on the remaining technical issues and providing its opinion that the issues will not require any redesign – just a completion of the requested details calculations.

I decided that there was a need for some addition information in this “he said”, “she said” drama, so I made contact with Jeff Merrifield. We chatted on May 27, 2011 via Skype and cell phone while he was waiting for a delayed flight.

Jeff served on the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission from 1998-2007. He is now a senior vice president of the Shaw Group which is a partner (and part owner) with Westinghouse Electric Company, the designer of the AP1000. There are eight units of that Generation III advanced light water reactor plant in various stages of construction, with four units in China, two units at the Vogtle site in Georgia and two units at the VC Summer site in South Carolina.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/AtomicShowFiles/tpn_atomic_20110527_167.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 24:16 — 11.2MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Advanced Atomic Technologies, Atomic politics, Podcast

Avatar

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AvatarDavid Walters says

    May 28, 2011 at 4:41 AM

    Rod! More shows like this!

  2. AvatarReese says

    May 30, 2011 at 7:21 AM

    Rod,

    I haven’t listened to this yet, but will. I’ll predict that my comment is pertinent though:

    The Chairman is a “malicious complier.” He (like the president) touts that he is for “safe” nuclear power expansion “in the future” without defining “safe” or “future.”

  3. AvatarReese says

    May 31, 2011 at 4:23 AM

    That was a swell interview Rod.

  4. AvatarDavid Lewis says

    June 4, 2011 at 3:37 AM

    I would have appreciated discussion about the difference in cost if the design of that “brittle SC wall module #2 in Figure 1 (redacted) that Dr Ma is so concerned about was modified in the way he wants.

    I wondered, is there just a standard AP1000 or can they supply versions for different performance levels?

    A guy who wants to build his AP1000 where all he has to worry about is the standard, common, garden variety event such as an Airbus full of fuel hurled by a Category 5 tornado striking the weakest point of Module #2 just as an earthquake measuring 8.2 on the Richter scale occurs is one thing, but what about all those guys who want to build them in more hazardous places?

    Some are having a field day with Dr. Ma’s statement that “the impact energy could shatter the wall as it does to a glass cup”. See: http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=11-P13-00015&segmentID=2

    Its good to see Rod putting interviews like this out.

  5. AvatarMichele Kearney says

    June 9, 2011 at 12:11 AM

    I find the Chairman’s conduct in the review of Westinghouse’s design application offensive and demonstrative of the lack of good governance at NRC

    to abide by the Administrative Procedures Act and the

    rule of law. I don’t believe that NRC has licensed a

    new nuclear plant since its existence. So any criticism that NRC is in bed with the industry is without merit.

    Its a sad commentary on the operations of the US Federal government that the nuclear industry has been forced to resort to building its business overseas and not in the US.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #291 – Kalev Kallemets, Fermi Energia

Preliminary lessons available to be learned from Feb 2021 extended cold spell

South Texas Project Unit 1 tripped at 0537 on Feb 15, 2021

Atomic Show #290 – Myrto Tripathi, Voices of Nuclear

Change is in the wind: Commencing a new phase as a Venture Capitalist

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy