Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. The question is: Independence by 2040? Assuming a 20 year ramp up to Independence, that leaves scant time to get started. With venture Capital all but frozen the time line is not realistic. So, in the mean time, people talk and talk and talk. …..Or, on the otherhand, they remain silent. The issue becomes one of comflicting information and bad projections based on a technology (Pebble Bed Reactors) that should become history. Relevence of something not implemented nor well understood puts this in the realm of Water Witches and Spooks. Jeane Manning (Atlantis Rising columnist) and NEMCA activist, has a valid point with current nuclear (be it heavy water or pebble bed) about “How clean is something that should be buried?

    All of this whilst Dr. Godin and the Russian Academy of Science develope a fussion hydraulic turbine for public utility and military applications. Note: No commercial use of the new technology is planned. This is because OIL and GAS are the backbone of the Russian economy. Sound familiar? The point is, it is time to move on ….or remain stagnant waiting burial.

    Mike

  2. Thanks for pointing out Joe Shuster’s book, and for an interesting interview. It definitely sounds interesting, and there are a number of enthusiastic and informative reviews on Amazon. I’ll see if I can get the county library to order it.

Similar Posts

  • How long before Wisconsin electricity customers regret loss of Kewaunee?

    After a number of discussions with people in positions close to the decision to destroy the Kewaunee nuclear power station, I am now about 98% sure that it will be shut down as currently scheduled in May of 2013. I am also about 95% sure that the decision will cost electricity customers in the Midwest…

  • Atomic Show #233 – Innovators discuss advanced reactor development in US

    There are a growing number of innovative small companies and a few divisions of larger companies that have recognized that nuclear energy offers solutions to a number of important human challenges. Despite the proclamations by opponents, the Nuclear Renaissance is not any more dead in 2015 than the original Renaissance was dead in 1315. In…

  • Deep state actors at OMB turn DOE leaders into red-faced liars. Cannot revive, revitalize and expand nuclear energy with 25% less money

    Mark Menezes, the Undersecretary of Energy at the Department of Energy, gave an optimistic, forward-looking, audience-flattering, stage-setting talk at the Advanced Reactor Technical Summit. At least five times during his 10-minute talk, he repeated various combinations of a phrase – “revive, revitalize and expand” – that is apparently the mantra that the Administration has chosen…

  • If wind energy does not reduce CO2 emissions, why bother?

    Peter Lang has published an intriguing guest post at Brave New Climate titled CO2 avoidance cost with wind energy in Australia and carbon price implications. It has attracted about 125 lengthy, mostly well-referenced comments and repeat visits from Michael Goggin of the American Wind Energy Association. I think renewable energy mythology is a clever distraction…

  • Atom and the Fault

    I came across a fascinating little book by Richard Meehan titled The Atom and the Fault: Experts, Earthquakes and Nuclear Power. It was published in 1984 by MIT University Press. Meehan is a geotechnical engineer who participated in several controversial nuclear plant projects in California, including Bodega Head, Malibu, and Diablo Canyon. Though the book…

  • Atomic Show #239 – Sarah Laskow and the LNT model

    In March 2015, Foreign Policy magazine published an article by Sarah Laskow titled The Mushroom Cloud and The X-Ray Machine. The article described the controversy over the radiation protection model known as the linear, no-threshold dose response. Ms. Laskow conducted some admirable literature research and talked with a number of well-known people. The ones that…