2 Comments

  1. great show Rod… I was reading this today:

    http://technology.newscientist.com/channel/tech/mg19826514.200-nuclear-superfuel-gets-too-hot-to-handle.html

    would love to ear your thoughts on this… maybe a show with the host of this week in nuclear would be nice. Read the comments on this page they are quite good.

    quotes:

    They say that fuels with a burn-up above 45 GWd/tU cause previously unforeseen safety problems, and would break existing NRC safety rules unless changes are made to the way fuel elements are packaged.

    The danger would come if there were a sudden loss of cooling water – as in the accident that led to the partial meltdown of a reactor core at Three Mile Island,

    Simon

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Radiation probes indicate NO melt through at Fukushima Unit 1

    Tepco has recently released measurements that provide convincing evidence that virtually all of the corium in Fukushima Daiichi unit #1 remains safely stored inside an intact reactor pressure vessel. Despite all claims to the contrary, no substantial quantities of that material have melted through the pressure vessel to fall onto the concrete floor of the…

  • 112th Carnival of Nuclear Energy Bloggers – Back At Atomic Insights

    Every week, people who write articles about nuclear energy gather their favorites together in a single post called the Carnival of Nuclear Energy Bloggers. We’ve been doing this regularly for more than two years; it is my pleasure to host the 112th issue of the Carnival. Here are our favorite posts from the first week…

  • Atomic Show #332 – Thomas Jam Pedersen, CEO Copenhagen Atomics

    Copenhagen Atomics is an ambitious Danish company with a bold, potentially world-changing vision. They’re driven by a goal of manufacturing one reactor per day from a high quality, certified factory. If they achieve that goal, they would be adding an additional 37 GW/year of heat to the global energy supply. They want to help make…

  • UK nuclear regulation gaining ground as a gold standard in effectiveness

    The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has often described itself as “the gold standard” in nuclear reactor regulation. Sometimes that view has been reinforced by the nuclear industry by comments along the lines of “if you can license your design in the US, you can license it anywhere.” I am not sure if that is because…