The New York Times published a story titled Certainties of 1970s Energy Crisis Have Fallen Away that caused me to fire up my keyboard to send a note back to the author. Following my personal mantra of “reduce, reuse, and recycle”, I thought I would share that note with you.
Ms. Galbraith:
Your article titled “Certainties of 1970s Energy Crisis Have Fallen Away” was interesting, but it contained an inaccurate and misleading sentence:
“The only alternative to succeed on a large scale, however, has been wind power, and most of that growth did not occur until the past decade.”
You mentioned how current events seem like deja vu for “Texans of a certain age.” I consider myself to “of a certain age”, though I am not from Texas. As a 51 year old grandfather, I came of age during the 1970s. The Arab Oil Embargo and the Iranian hostage crisis were two of the more influential events of my life; both illustrated the vulnerability of my cherished American way of life to events in distant lands. Our freedom and comfort are often dependent on fuel extracted and transported enormous distances.
After sharing the American experience of two very painful lessons about energy, I chose to enter a profession that offered a path towards independence. As a nuclear-trained submarine officer, I spent many months at sea without getting a single fuel delivery and without emitting a single molecule of SOX, NOX or CO2 – except during those rare times when we practiced using our emergency diesel engines. The US Navy no longer operates any oil powered aircraft carriers or submarines; all of them use nuclear energy instead.
In the commercial electric power business, nuclear energy, which produced no electricity in the US before 1957, grew to the point where it now produces about 806 billion kilowatt hours per year in America. That is more than 10 times as much electricity as windmills produce. It is also about 30% more electricity every year than the entire US power grid produced in 1959, the year I was born. It has helped to eliminate the use of about 1.5 million barrels of oil per day from the electric power market.
According to the BP annual energy outlook, nuclear power plants around the world produce the energy equivalent of 12 million barrels of oil per day. That output is equivalent to the contribution of Saudi Arabia PLUS Kuwait.
Though there have been many efforts to suppress this technology – many driven by people who make a lot of money by selling coal, oil and natural gas – nuclear energy has had a far more successful history of replacing fossil fuel in the energy market than any other alternative energy source.
It is poised to continue capturing a growing market share as more and more people realize that the events at Fukushima Daiichi, as scary as they have seemed, have resulted in very few actual injuries or illnesses.
Rod Adams
Publisher, Atomic Insights
Rod Adams
Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.
On Sunday, January 13, 2013, I had a conversation with Dr. Jerry Cuttler and Dr. A. David Rossin. Each of these distinguished gentlemen has a long history of working with ionizing radiation and studying its biological effects on human beings. Dr. Jerry Cuttler earned his PhD in 1964. He has performed radiation research, designed radiation…
In a press release carefully coordinated with mass internet mailings to all the old anti-technology political action groups, Nader’s well-funded Critical Mass organization tries to create the impression of “a growing coalition of national, international and grassroots groups” joined by “many scientists, experts and the public.” But there is nothing spontaneous or grass-rootsy about this…
During the period between 1961 and 1994, an extraordinary machine called the Experimental Breeder Reactor 2 (EBR-II) was created and operated in the high desert of Idaho by a team of dedicated, determined, and distinguished people. In 1986, that machine demonstrated that it could protect itself in the event of a complete loss of flow…
The Economist recently published a column titled Climate politics: Flush with cash. So what? that described the results of a recent study by Matthew Nisbet, an researcher at American University in Washington, DC. According to Nisbet, groups classified in the environmental category spent almost $400 million on climate change and energy issues in 2009. The…
Circumstances sometimes create some rather strange alliances. This week, despite being a proud liberal who proudly supports public education, comes from a family of union school teachers, appreciates the value of being covered by a single payer medical plan and voted for President Obama, I find myself cheering for a group of representatives who are…
This morning I found an article titled Builders pessimistic about new nuclear plants published in the Tampa Bay Times, one of my former hometown newspapers. (As a retired naval officer, I have about a dozen former hometowns.) The author built his case about pessimism for new nuclear plant construction on the words of a single…