• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Secret Message Embedded in ExxonMobil's Outlook for Energy

December 12, 2009 By Rod Adams

On December 11, 2009, I downloaded a copy of ExxonMobil’s publication titled “Outlook for Energy: A View to 2030”. When I searched through the document to see what ExxonMobil, a large supplier of both oil and natural gas that compete with nuclear energy for market share, had to say about the future of nuclear energy. As a fact-driven company, ExxonMobil does not ignore nuclear and recognizes that it plays a large role today and has the potential to grow rapidly in the future.

While searching the document to see where the word “nuclear” appeared in the document, I was surprised to see the word flashing from underneath some of the graphics. In one place, the way that it flashed completely changed the meaning of a highlighted quote box. On page 26, there is a quote in the upper right hand corner of the page that says:

Oil and natural gas remain essential through 2030, but the most important “fuel” of all will be energy saved through improved efficiency.

However, when I searched for the word nuclear, here is what it looked like it said as I clicked on the next arrow:

Oil and natural gas remain essential through 2030, but the most important “fuel” of all will be nuclear energy . . .
(I got so excited when I saw that word pop up in that particular location that I stopped reading the rest of the quote box.)

I know it was probably quite accidental and that it really meant nothing, but I was so amused that I documented the experience in the above video.

Just in case people might accuse me of making stuff up, I asked Atomic Insights readers to visit ExxonMobil’s web site and download the document before it got changed and to document their experience through the comment section on the December 11, 2009 post. If you do not believe that the document that I described in the video actually came directly from ExxonMobil, go and read the comments. (Many commenters on Atomic Insights are engineering types, so you will find that they have come up with a logical explanation that does not involve any secret admiration, but my interpretation is more amusing and interesting.)

Related Posts

  • ExxonMobil aiming to capture growth in US electricity market

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pete says

    December 13, 2009 at 5:26 PM

    This is off-topic, but a few months ago Rod posted a link to the Bonneville Power Administration showing how much power they get from wind turbines. Look at the graph over the past week.
    http://www.transmission.bpa.gov/Business/Operations/Wind/baltwg.aspx

    Close to nothing over seven days straight.

  2. katana0182 (Dave) says

    December 13, 2009 at 7:27 PM

    Speaking of that subject, I just dugg the following article: “With Wind Energy, Opportunity for Corruption” from the New York Times site.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/world/europe/14wind.html?hpw=&pagewanted=all

    If you have a Digg account (which is worthwhile to get), please help me make the story popular by digging the article on this page:
    http://digg.com/environment/Wind_Dependent_On_Gov_t_Subsidies_Not_Selling_Electricity

  3. katana0182 (Dave) says

    December 14, 2009 at 1:55 AM

    Thanks, Rod. Is Bukowsky a reader on here?

  4. Jerry says

    December 14, 2009 at 5:38 AM

    Isn’t it almost prophetic they had, of all things, their “efficiency” message replaced by nuclear. This their plan: by promoting efficiency as the new “fuel” or “energy source”, they are *discouraging* any additional energy production, which would sooner or later lead to the re-discovery of zero-carbon nuclear energy. In the end of course, the efficiency-as-energy-source idea will turn out a big lie, when plugin hybrids start invading the streets, guzzling huge amounts of domestic electricity, but by then it will be too late to build new plants, so their “good old” technology of burning oil and gas will be the only one readily available to fulfill the demand.

  5. R Margolis says

    December 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    The message of “oil and gas will be the primary energy source through 2030/50 THEN nuclear will dominate” is also prominent in the petroleum engineering magazines as well. My guess is that the oil/gas companies will get back into nuclear once the real builidng starts.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Eino on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Rob Brixey on Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?
  • Jon Grams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin
  • Rod Adams on Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy