• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Colorado Senator Mark Udall Affirms His Support For Nuclear Power, Upsetting Some "Environmentalists"

August 25, 2009 By Rod Adams

Senator Mark Udall (D-CO), while touring Rocky Mountain National Park and observing the ill health of the lodge-pole pine trees, confirmed his belief that nuclear power is a useful tool in the battle against climate change.

“If we want to respond to climate change, nuclear has to be part of the solution,” Udall said.

Senator Udall was touring the park along with Senator John McCain (R-AZ). Both senators represent states with a large portions of their population consisting of people who have lifelong concerns about the effects of human activity on the environment. Both senators have expressed concerns over the effects of climate change on important lands, especially in the national park system.

Udall’s position on nuclear power has riled some of the people in the Environmental movement, but he is in good company with lifelong environmentalists like Stewart Brand, James Lovelock and Patrick Moore. Each of those well-respected thought leaders believe that the challenges associated with nuclear energy are easier to solve than the need to continue dumping billions of tons of CO2 created by burning enough fossil fuel to supply the world’s energy demands.

Udall is a strong proponent of the state’s New Energy sector and is seen as a friend to the green movement in the state. His advancement of nuclear power, however, has alarmed environmentalists, who see the risks posed by uranium mining and nuclear power plant construction as far outweighing any benefits to be derived from expanding the contemporary nuclear industry.

Keith Hay, energy advocate for Denver-based Environment Colorado, has argued against the inclusion of nuclear power as a part of any clean-energy discussion. Hay told the Colorado Independent in May that there was “a strong push by southern Democrats to include nuclear and clean coal in the renewable energy standard” but that environmentalists thought any such tack was misguided at best.

“Anyone who has seen the front end of uranium mining for nuclear knows that it is in no way clean.”
(Source: Udall reasserts controversial pro-nuclear position)

I wonder if Mr. Hay has seen the front end of natural gas production, steel production, or even copper production, each of which are necessary components of competitive energy sources like natural gas, wind and solar energy. I wonder if he has read the same projections as Randy Udall, Mark’s brother, who wrote the following, just a few days ago:

It’s a heartbreaking dilemma: The gas industry has not been gentle on Western landscapes, but climate change could be worse. So pick your poison. To displace coal with gas, we’d need to complete 30,000 to 40,000 new wells a year for decades to come. If that’s our only strategy for averting climate disaster, we might need to put somebody like Sarah Palin in charge of drilling.
(Source: Column: Can natural gas save the world? )

I also wish that the author of the piece about Senator Udall’s visit to Rocky Mountain National Park had been a bit more consistent with his reporting by including a modifier in the sentence claiming that his position was upsetting to Environmentalists. It should have read:

His advancement of nuclear power, however, has alarmed some environmentalists. . .

One more thing that Senators Udall and McCain have in common is that they represent states that played a major role in making the US the world’s largest uranium producer for several decades before the miners abandoned the effort when uranium prices collapsed. Both states still contain valuable deposits and have a number of active permitting actions in progress.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Rod Adams on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gareth on “The Martian’s” RTG science includes jarring errors
  • Gene Nelson, Ph.D. on Atomic Energy Wells

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Oil and gas opposition to consolidate interim spent fuel (CISF) storage facilities in Permian Basin

Atomic Energy Wells

Enough with “renewables!”

Can prototype nuclear reactors be licensed in the US under current rules?

Atomic Show #303 – Bret Kugelmass, CEO Last Energy

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy