Similar Posts

  • Statoil carbon capture – aka "carbon sequestration" – project

    There is at least one company that has installed the capability to capture carbon and inject it into a geologic structure on a reasonably large scale. Statoil, a Norwegian oil and gas company that produces about 60% of Norway’s annual petroleum output, installed a carbon separation and compression system in its Sleipner West field in…

  • Energy supply comparisons in theage.com.au

    A March 5, 2007 article titled Countdown to climate change had some favorable comparisons between nuclear power and other possible new energy sources. Geosequestration is further away and arguably more unsafe than the nuclear option. Its problems include: there is no evidence to show it can be done on a commercial scale; nobody knows what…

  • Frank Zarb, Ford Adminstration Energy Czar, recommends nuclear power

    Frank Zarb was the pragmatic energy advisor to President Ford during the period between the Arab Oil embargo and the Iranian hostage crisis. It was a period when plenty of people were thinking hard about how to reduce America’s vulnerability to petroleum supply disruptions caused by uncontrollable events in unstable areas of the world. On…

  • Irish blog discussing nuclear options for the island nation

    Eric McErlain posted a blog titled Ireland considers new nuclear build that pointed to a blog on GUBU titled Wind is blowing for nuclear. It introduced me to a blog from Sarah Carey, a lady who has this to say about her background: I am 35 years old, married with two small children and living…

  • Reactor Vessel Forging Constraint Rapidly Disappearing

    One of the more frequently mentioned constraints on new nuclear power plant construction is the production of large steel components like reactor pressure vessels. Until recently, there was only one place outside of Russia – Japan Steel Works – with the capability to produce the 500 ton forgings required to allow the manufacture of a…