• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Russia's New Year Gift to Nuclear Power – Another Natural Gas Cutoff

January 1, 2009 By Rod Adams

Though I often describe Russia as a nation of skilled chess players to my colleagues as I attempt to remind them that Russia’s “Great Power” aspirations did not start or end with the rise and fall of the Soviet Union, even good chess players can make short sighted moves.

This morning, Russia, after another round of failed negotiations with Ukraine, has once again begun to cut off deliveries of natural gas. Gazprom, of course, claims that it is simply reducing the portion of its exports destined for Ukraine, but since the pipes still go through Ukraine before they get to the rest of Europe, the reduction in supply has the very real potential for causing some economic disruption in all of Western Europe.

From my point of view, there are few actions that do a better job of getting people to listen to the good news about nuclear power than heavy-handed natural gas supply cutoffs. Even nations that do not have an indigenous supply of commercial nuclear fuel should recognize that there are potential energy security benefits available from basing a large portion of their electrical power supplies on fission.

The important point to share is that it is relatively simple to store enough fuel to last several years. All that is needed is a secure building no bigger than a two truck fire station. With a fuel like natural gas, storage for more than a few weeks is quite problematic. Naftogaz, the owner and operator of Ukraine’s natural gas network, claims a total storage capacity of 32 billion cubic meters. That is technically enough to supply Ukraine’s needs for about 6 months, but the last time that Russia cut off shipments, customers started feeling the pain of shortages in just a couple of days.

The negotiating brinkmanship that is possible with gas is much less likely with commercial nuclear fuel. This gas supply interruption, like the one that occurred in 2006, may capture sufficient media attention to remind people that there is a nuclear option that enables a strong negotiation position with fuel suppliers. Perhaps German leaders will reconsider the country’s decision to prematurely shutter its well maintained and operated nuclear power plants. It might help them to remind their citizens that the political decision to limit their total lifetime power output was originally negotiated by a man who now works for the Russian gas company, not someone who was interested in Germany’s long term energy security.

Additional reading

  • BusinessWeek.com – Gazprom Stokes European Energy Worries
  • Breitbart.com – Russia’s Gazprom cuts all gas supplies to Ukraine
  • Steph’s blog – Resisting Russian Imperium

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Avatar

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AvatarDavid Walters says

    January 1, 2009 at 2:36 PM

    Rod this one of the reasons that Russia is building *several* new gas pipelines that bypass Ukraine. Instead of having their traditional pipeline network in series, they are moving to a parallel network (to stretch the electrical diagram metaphor a bit).
    From Russia’s pov, they have no choice. The only problem they’ve had is with Ukraine, not other country. Additionally, they want to be the conduit for gas from the countries east of the Caspian. To do this, to play the role in fact that Ukraine has, they need to be able to deliver Kazakstan and Tajikistan’s natural gas to their customers with no hold ups. Thus, in part, the new Baltic and Beylorussian gas lines.
    The irony of all this is that Russia is trying to hinder nuclear development in Western Europe because they know nuclear competes with their revenue stream from gas. So they are out to kill it. The irony continues because they know countries like Belarus and Ukraine are bad revenue stream suppliers because of their very week economies. But that’s not ‘ironic’, that’s economics…
    …indeed..so Russia, even TODAY, is fast organizing the building on nuclear power plants in: Belarus and Ukraine! Europeans won’t buy Russia’s VVERs but Ukraine will. So they are purposely destroying the rather weak Ukraine gas market by selling them billions of dollars of VVERs and then allowing the Russians to shift the gas to Germany and France and Austria.
    Strange but True!
    Happy New Years!
    D

  2. AvatarAnonymous says

    January 4, 2009 at 12:10 PM

    And what will Obama do about this? cave in to Russia, the Islamic fascists and Red China, appoint anti-nuke NRC commissioners, stymie new nuke growth in the US, promote useless solar and wind power.

  3. AvatarAnonymous says

    January 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM

    Comment deleted. Off topic and inappropriate.

  4. AvatarTrackback says

    January 5, 2009 at 7:24 AM

    Trackback message
    Title: January 5, 2008
    Excerpt: Headlines
    Soot reduction could help stop global warming
    In Obama

  5. AvatarTrackback says

    January 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM

    Trackback message
    Title: January 5, 2008
    Excerpt: Headlines
    Soot reduction could help stop global warming
    In Obama

  6. AvatarAnonymous says

    January 5, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    Deleted

  7. AvatarGeorge Carty says

    February 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    I wonder if the right-wing troll is especially upset because you linked to Steph’s blog (she has some rather anti-American and pro-Iranian views, and is the only blogger I’ve seen use the word “Eurabia” who wasn’t an Islamophobe or someone writing about Islamophobes).
    Since she describes her politics as anarchist, I very much expected her to oppose nuclear power (because nuclear has a reputation as something which must be Big and Centralized – and therefore not compatible with anarchism). She pleasantly surprised me…

    • AvatarGeorge Carty says

      December 9, 2010 at 4:40 PM

      The link to Steph’s blog doesn’t work now, as she split her blog, with the original URL being used only for her self-defence related posts. “Resisting Russian Imperium” is now at Viva l’Anarchia.

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #291 – Kalev Kallemets, Fermi Energia

Preliminary lessons available to be learned from Feb 2021 extended cold spell

South Texas Project Unit 1 tripped at 0537 on Feb 15, 2021

Atomic Show #290 – Myrto Tripathi, Voices of Nuclear

Change is in the wind: Commencing a new phase as a Venture Capitalist

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2021 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy