• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives
  • Links

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Second try at graph for non combustion energy in US

July 2, 2008 By Rod Adams

I have done some reformatting of the graph of non combustion energy sources in the US during the period of 1949-2006. Following the suggestion of Kirk Sorensen, I put wind, solarPV and geothermal on the bottom of the chart in an attempt to better illustrate their growth.

Feedback is welcome. Source of the data is Table 1.3 of the Energy Information Agency’s Annual Energy Review, posted at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/overview.html on June 23, 2008.



Update: (Posted at 4:40 am on Friday July 4, 2008) This graph generated a useful discussion about the units and the method of comparison between various energy sources. I learned that the Energy Information Agency table used to create the chart makes the assumption that electricity generation has an efficiency of about 33% (10,400 BTU per kilowatt hour).

When the statisticians build a table that compares some energy sources that produce heat and are also used to produce electricity (fossil fuels, geothermal) against other energy sources like the wind, hydro, nuclear (so far) and solar photovoltaics that produce only electricity they attempt to equalize the comparisons.

Electricity production from various energy sources (nuclear, geothermal, wind, solar PV or solar thermal electricity) are converted into thermal energy using 10,400 BTU per kilowatt hour while energy sources using direct thermal energy (solar water heaters, geothermal heat pumps, fossil fuel space heat, fossil fuel process heat) are simply measured in BTU. (Without the 33% efficiency assumption for electricity, the real conversion is 3412 BTU per kilowatt hour.)

Here is a slightly modified version of the graph with a better legend and cleaner text.

Update: Posted July 6, 2008 0425

A reader requested a version of the above with the energy sources ordered from smallest to largest (bottom to top). Here is the result for anyone to use under creative commons (full attribution). (Snarky note: there really is a tiny bit of purple down in the bottom right corner of the graph that represents the amount of solar thermal and solar PV energy calculated by the EIA and adjusted by multiplying the electricity by a factor of 3.)


Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. Financial, strategic, and political analyst. Former submarine Engineer Officer. Founder, Adams Atomic Engines, Inc. Host and producer, The Atomic Show Podcast. Resume available here.

Please subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Search Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Follow Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

The Fearless Green Deal

Did US Navy patent a functional fusion device?

Sharing message at #StrikeWithUs – We can use nuclear energy to address climate change

Atomic Show #267 – Dr. Lauren Jackson addresses radiophobia

What exploded in Russia on Aug 8? My estimate is a (chemical) booster rocket for a nuclear powered cruise missile.

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2019 · Atomic Insights