Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.
Rod, there is virtually no rational reason for fearing tritium in any likely dose.
I’m not buying.
http://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/
@Bob Applebaum
Thanks for stopping by and helping me to remember that all is right with the world. You’re predictable; I can count on a comment about any LNT related post or one that includes a reference to Dr. Jerry Cuttler or Dr. Wade Allison within minutes.
If you are not buying my information about the health effects of low level radiation, that is fine by me. There are plenty of other customers out there.
Just curious – how did Studsvik’s recent sale of US assets affect your net worth?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/studsvik-ab-studsvik-sells-main-074000749.html
Your former company – RACE – made up most of the Memphis-based portion of the assets that were sold.
http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=12748#.U43DRZStkz0
(Emphasis added.)
It still amuses me that a multimillionaire radiation protection professional spends his time tracking little old Atomic Insights blog posts about the LNT assumption.
Are you selling?
I had sent a request to CBS and NBC and the New Times websites to review or feedback on Dr. Allison’s comments since they have no problem jumping hoops to interview antinukes. See how long it takes.
Aside:
Anyone seen the new futuristic GE commercial with the little girl telling how great a scientist her mom is inventing hyper-jet engines and hyper-efficient trains and — no kidding — UNDERWATER windmills??? Has GE EVER showcased any of their reactors or nuclear business I wonder! How would that be any more outlandish??
James Greenidge
Queens NY
Bob – it’s probably not a good idea to quote a book if you’ve failed to digest its contents.
The central point of Oreskes and Conway’s book is that there are “experts”of dubious credentials who engage the media only and not scientific colleagues, who are in the pay of political and industrial concerns, who seek to make the scientific consensus seem controversial or weak in the eyes of the public, regardless of scientific opinion.
This is not a description that freely applies to any scientist you don’t like. Wade Allison is a qualified author publishing in both the scientific and popular press. That doesn’t make him right, but it does mean that he shouldn’t be subject to the kind of slur you’ve (quite possibly inadvertently) placed upon him.
But as you’ve brought the topic up, I look at Greenpeace and the various Caldicott satellites, and – with the exception of industry funding (political funding abounds) – one sees the same pattern amongst the anti-nuclear movement as one can find in the climate change denial movement as outlined by Oreskes and Conway in their excellent book. Greenpeace’s main radiation expert is an art restorer by day. What’s that about?
Actually there is *some* funding from competing industry.
Look up ‘Friends of the Earth’ on Wikipedia & then click on the name of the person providing the initial funding to see where his money came from.
Thanks. Climate-change deniers and Anti-Nukes are really different sides of the same coin. There are a lot of similarities. Starting with a lack of respect for Science.
I think that the “underwater windmills” are (or are supposed to be) tidal hydrokinetic turbines because they are “powered by the Moon” according to the ad.
Sam, I like your second paragraph. I think I’ve never seen the phenomenon described that succinctly. I wish I could commit it to memory for future discussions.
If the anti-nuke people were anti-tidal turbine, they would claim that such generators were going to cause the moon to crash into the Earth…
Does that mean that “moon power” has killed way more people than nuclear power ever has because of tidal waves?
Tapping the Tides will slow the moon’s recession from the earth, and will eventually slow the earth’s rotation such that the earth will eventually become tidally locked with the Sun.
So much for “Sustainability” of tidal turbines.
That is very very interesting. Considering that the other FOE founder David Brower split with the Sierra Club over financial issues and the Club agreeing with the siting of Diablo Canyon NPP (Brower was anti-nuke).
I’m amazed.
One way to force people to face their irrational skittish of radiation (and for atomicinsights to draw receive lots of search hits) is having a feature called “Radioactive Grand Central Station”. Anyone ever bring a Geiger counter into the grand hall there (forget the deeper narrower galleries!)? My science class trip did that way back when and hearing the ticks suddenly rattle up when you came in from outside was lots of fun! No getting away from it! I guess Apple’s nice GC store there would be very unhappy if it got out that you take more than a few zaps of beta rays while checking out iPhones! Heck, Apple; I wonder if the MTA and GC businesses would be angry at losing frightened customers! Yea, I like this! Hard love getting people to accept radiation!
James Greenidge
Queens NY
@James Greenidge
If you film it, I will post it.