8 Comments

  1. Does the participation of MHI mean that the suspended work on the Brayton cycle high efficiency helium turbine will be restarted? Months ago that project was mothballed for financial reasons and the PBMR project redirected to process heat applications.

  2. Robert – here are the exact words from the press release:
    “The possibility that PBMR may in future still want to pursue the direct cycle, gas-turbine design, should also not be ruled out.

  3. And of course, the work on HTR-PM in Shidaowan China continues as well (250 MW pebble bed). The 10 MW HTR-10 is already operating in China.

  4. The South African government is expected to make a decision in a week or so as to whether it (and/or Eskom) will continue to support the PBMR company.
    Many believe that further support will NOT be provided
    My view is that this MOU press release is a last-minute attempt to influence that decision.

  5. The MOU sounds like throwing in the towel on their pebble bed work until a customer other than Eskom can be found. Too bad they didn’t start smaller and use a different “coolant”

  6. This won’t be yet another reactor lining up at the US government feeding trough will it? Take your number and hope that the entire treasury hasn’t been drained by the time you get to the window. But the loan guarantee crowd is out to prove that nuclear reactors aren’t financially viable so better get your, uh our, money now.

  7. Like a porker at the government feeding trough? Why, of course! What else is new?!?
    Kind of like that pie-in-the-sky Global Positioning System, the delusion of a Digital Encryption Standard, the wasteful Transcontinental Railroads, that absurdly expensive Interstate Highway System, the socialistic Morrill Land Grant College Act, that nonsense back in the 1960s about sending a man to a moon on a bottle-rocket (IT WAS STAGED!), that crackpot idea by some insane Italian guy named Fermi and that no-good shifty Einstein character to build some kind of pile of pencil lead for neutrons under a squash court in Chicago, the money-pit of the Human Genome Project, and the pork-barrel spending leading to the creation of the infamous ARPANET (we all know ABSOLUTELY no good came of that!) Whatever came of those useless budgetary black holes, I wonder? Obviously nothing at all.
    Nuclear power’s just another form of government waste, fraud and abuse. Creeping communism in concrete, I say!
    </sarcasm>

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Strongly Recommend Disapproval of Attack on Iran

    As a currently serving military officer, I am not allowed to campaign for a particular candidate or political party. I am part of an organization that is subordinate to the authority of civilian leaders and required to follow their orders. I am also required to be respectful of those in my chain of command. I…

  • Bob Guccione and Small Nuclear Power – Fusion Promoters Seduced Him

    I keep close tabs on developments in small nuclear reactors, so I was intrigued this morning to notice that many returns in a news search with that phrase kept turning up obituaries for Bob Guccione, the founder and long time publisher of Penthouse Magazine. Here is a quote from the New York Times version: The…

  • Constellation Energy tells Maryland that it wants fair treatment

    CNNMoney published an article on January 30, 2008 that would surprise anyone who was active in nuclear politics in the 1990s and then stopped paying attention. The brief article, titled Constellation Energy Challenges Md’s Regulatory Environment informed readers that the company was going to take a proactive stance about any delaying tactics that might impede…

  • The Dose Makes the Poison – Rockwell on Properly Evaluating Radiation Hazards

    Ted Rockwell is a man who literally wrote the book on radiation shielding while he was serving as the Technical Director at Naval Reactors. He was in that position during the period when the Nautilus and the Shippingport reactors were built to use the heat generated by fission to produce useful power. Ted has been…

  • EnergyPulse article – Does Nuclear Power Make Sense?

    There is an energetic discussion going on at EnergyPulse associated with a rather provocative article titled Does Nuclear Power Really Make Sense?. As of a few minutes ago (3:20 am on May 2, 2006), there were 44 comments, many of them making excellent sense and using solid facts to support the positions stated. Of course,…