• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Boiling Water

X-300 Blazing a Different Kind of Trail in Smaller Nuclear Reactor Development

April 1, 2020 By Rod Adams 18 Comments

BWRX-300 courtesy of GEH

GEH spent about half a billion dollars designing, testing and certifying the ESBWR. Despite that investment, the 1,520 MWe Enhanced, Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) design documents are just gathering dust with no active projects in sight.

GEH is a joint venture between US-based GE, a $95 billion annual revenue conglomerate and Hitachi, a Japanese technology leader that is in the same corporate weight class as GE.

Inside both companies, nuclear power is a relatively minor and often-neglected business unit.

A small, but growing group of people working at GEH believe they have found a way to extract value from the trove of already reviewed and approved ESBWR licensing documents. They know that the ESBWR design has many positive attributes, but the product packaging, size and marketing are not well suited to the current power and heat market.

GEH’s new X-300 power station design is a rethought and repackaged ESBWR. The company believes they have successfully addressed the factors that convinced customers the ESBWR wasn’t worth building.

On Monday, March 30, I spoke with David Sledzik, SVP Sales and Product Management at GE, to learn more about GEH’s X-300 development and deployment plans.

Utilities don’t want to be first in line

One hard lesson from the slow start of the Nuclear Renaissance is that utility companies – and competitive power generators that used to be utilities – do not want to be first. They are interested in building proven machines that can be delivered at a predictable price on a predictable schedule. They won’t buy incomplete designs anymore.

Neither corporate boards nor public utility commissions will approve the almost open ended investments that are an inevitable feature of FOAK projects.

The federal government created the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program as a partial solution to the first mover avoidance problem. That program will help to fund construction of two demonstration projects that can be completed within five to seven years of the government’s final contract award.

The ARD program will require a significant matching investment from private company participants, but many believe the direct federal investment reduces the risk into the acceptable range.

Note: It is important to keep in mind that no one is promising that they will be able to complete a project by a certain date. The clock cannot start running until primary contracts are in place. No doubt there will be people who forget that fact when they begin criticizing and claiming missed deadlines

The financial boundaries of the ARD program encourage smaller projects.

GEH is part of a coalition of companies that will be responding to the DOE’s promised solicitation with a proposal that will include the first X-300 as the target demonstration technology.

5 times smaller version of already licensed design

The X-300 is fundamentally a smaller version of the ESBWR. That fact turns GEH’s investment in licensing the 5 times larger machine from a write off stored on a dusty shelf to something with real value.

Instead of starting a licensing review from scratch, GEH will submit licensing topical reports (LTR) that cover the differences between the X-300 and the ESBWR. These reports will allow the company to incorporate the previously approved features and analysis by reference, eliminating the need to do a full review.

That process started several months ago. On Jan 30, GEH announced that it had submitted the first LTR for the X-300 at the end of 2019.

Sledzik told me that the NRC expects a 12 month review cycle on each of the LTRs. Numerous reviews can be conducted in parallel.

The company has determined that the two step, Part 50 licensing process is better suited than the one step, Part 52 process to a first of a kind development project. Part 50 will enable earliest possible completion and operation. Part 50 licensing means that construction can be started after a preliminary safety analysis and a issuance of a construction permit.

Even though using Part 50 licensing, the company and its partners will carefully approach construction sequencing. They need to be confident that they will not be slowed by significant redesign or need to rebuild already completed portions of the plant.

Smaller plants are easier to cool

It’s almost trite to point out that smaller nuclear plants produce proportionally less decay heat. It’s also obvious that it’s easier to cool cores with a smaller number of traditional fuel assemblies.

Based on design calculations and model simulations, GEH believes that the X-300 design can passively cool itself for at least 7 days without any external power or need for operator intervention.

Smaller plants are easier to build

Conventional engineering scaling laws say that cost per unit of output power should increase for a smaller unit. But those scaling laws do not recognize the importance of packaging costs.

As part of its design-to cost effort for the X-300, GEH has found a way to shrink the total size of the power plant – including buildings and supporting systems – by 90% when compared to the ESBWR. Even with a power output reduction of 80%, the result is that X-300 uses half as much material per unit power.

Using safety grade concrete as a useful comparison metric, the 1520 MWe ESBWR needs ~100 m^3/MWe; the 300 MWe needs ~50 m^3/MWe.

Another construction advantage of a smaller reactor core and the associated narrower containment structure is that the resulting system dimensionally fits within the capability of tunnel boring equipment.

Compared to traditional excavation techniques, tunnel boring machines can substantially reduce the time required to create the 40 meter deep hole that will house the reactor and containment portion of the X-300.

Advanced construction techniques will enable the containment structure to be assembled above ground and then sunk into the hole created by the boring machines. A significant design and testing effort is required to convince regulators that the containment system can be properly inspected both before installation and throughout the life of the reactor plant.

One advantage that GEH has over many of its competitors in the business of building smaller nuclear plants is that it is part of a conglomerate with a large steam turbine and generator division. GE’s steam power plant unit has deployed approximately 200 turbine generator sets that are virtually identical to the 300 MWe sets that will be paired with the X-300 reactor steam supply system.

Utilities are interested and investing

Though no utility has made a commitment to build an X-300, at least one utility, Dominion, has publicly announced that it is investing and participating in the X-300 development.

I spoke to Dan Stoddard, Dominion’s Chief Nuclear Officer, on Tuesday, March 31. Though he was careful to remind me that Dominion does not have any plans to build an X-300, he explained why his company was interested enough to make some “modest” investments in the technology development.

Dominion is committed to steadily reducing CO2 emissions. The company has recognized and is taking advantage of the steep cost reductions in solar power systems, but it believes there are limits to the total amount of solar power their system can accommodate while maintaining system reliability.

He acknowledged the fact that there is great enthusiasm about energy storage, but reminded me that 4 hours of storage is far from the amount needed to cover routine nighttime demands. When it comes to seasonal variations in solar power, existing forms of storage cannot begin to cope with addressing the challenge within any kind of reasonable cost.

So Dominion believes that nuclear energy is necessary to achieve CO2 emission goals, but the company isn’t interested in taking a “bet the company” risk. If expectations can be achieved, the X-300 appears to be a good fit for needs that will begin to rapidly grow in the late 2020s through the 2050s.

The projected cost of the plant – perhaps $700 M for a 300 MWe Nth of a kind unit – fits within the normal financial capability of the company. (That number is computed from company’s announced target of $2,250/kWe with a margin for error and using a more appropriate, single-significant-digit precision.)

The moderate power output means that it would be possible for the company to build several follow-on units on the same site without overwhelming transmission systems or causing major system bottlenecks.

Despite its history of increasing costs, the nuclear industry has successfully lowered costs for succeeding units on the same site. Project managers learn to improve scheduling efficiency, workers learn their jobs, permitting challenges smooth out, and supply chains strengthen. Even Plant Vogtle, no one’s shining example of excellent cost and schedule performance, has demonstrated significant improvement between unit 3 and unit 4.

Stoddard indicated that Dominion wasn’t the only utility interested and involved in the X-300. He wasn’t willing or able to name others or to give me any hints on which sites are under consideration to be the place where the DOE-sponsored demonstration will be built.

Bottom line is that GEH’s X-300 is a formidable competitive entrant into the smaller reactor field. If the company fully supports the project with its considerable financial and political heft, the product could be a resounding success.

Filed Under: Boiling Water, Smaller reactors

GE-Hitachi and DTE announce additional ESBWR detailed design work

October 7, 2015 By Rod Adams 32 Comments

GE-Hitachi issued a press release on October 5 indicating that they will be working with DTE to determine the resource requirements and schedule for performing the detailed design work necessary to build an ESBWR (Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor) as Fermi Unit 3.

Though DTE has not announced a decision to build the facility, it received its COL (construction and operating license) in April 2015.

Cooperating with GE-Hitachi on detailed design work would enable DTE to move more quickly into a construction project if it decides that the facility’s production capacity is needed and that the ESBWR represents the best available choice to fill the need. That decision is a complex one that takes into account many factors in addition to the projected levelized cost of electricity from the completed nuclear power plant.

My assumption is that DTE’s reluctance to commit to building the plant is related to the intensive political discussion in Michigan regarding the future structure of the electricity market.

Though Michigan initially deregulated its wholesale market in 2000, the legislature revised the law in 2008 to implement a hybrid system that limits participation in a customer choice program to 10% of the total load of any of the existing monopoly utility companies. Because the choice program was most beneficial for larger customers, the 10% load cap means that about 0.5% of the customers currently participate.

There is an 11,000 customer-long waiting list and some pressure on the legislature to increase the portion of the market subject to competition. On the other side of the discussion, utility suppliers like DTE are in favor of eliminating the hybrid system and going back to a fully regulated market. They point out that the current law allows choice customers to change their selection without much notice.

That complicates long range capacity planning. It allows lucky customers to take advantage of an over-supplied regional market up to the point where the excess capacity disappears and prices begin to climb. If a substantial portion of the choice customers switch their selection, the utilities that are required to serve them would not have included their demand in their capacity planning. The choice customers would not have paid their share of the capacity additions.

As a result of the slowly accelerating economic recovery and dramatic drop in the price of oil, the regionally important automotive industry is growing and adding its demand to the increasing need for new capacity. There are a number of relatively small, old coal fired power plants that are likely to be shut down instead of retrofitted to meet increasingly stringent air pollution control requirements.

The treatment of new nuclear power plants under the Clean Power Plan provides additional support for a decision to build Fermi 3; states get credit for the emission free nature of nuclear energy. A single project that can produce close to 10 billion kilowatt-hours of clean electricity each year will make a large impact on Michigan’s ability to comply with the plan.

If the legislature provides more clarity about the future of electricity regulation, the likelihood of DTE making a final investment decision to build Fermi Unit 3 will increase.

That means there is a reasonably high probability that Fermi Unit 3 will remain the lead ESBWR and that my speculation about North Anna Unit 3 moving into the lead role was premature.

That project is still about two years behind Fermi Unit 3; according to the currently published review schedule, the final Safety Evaluation Report (SER) issuance is targeted for April 2017 and the final Commission decision on issuing a COL does not yet have a scheduled target date.

The North Anna 3 COL review schedule page was last reviewed on September 28, so it is only a little more than a week old.

Filed Under: Advanced Atomic Technologies, Boiling Water, New Nuclear

Steam generators are an option, not a necessity

July 18, 2013 By Rod Adams

The US Nuclear Regulator Commission (NRC) recently posted a blog written by Kenneth Karwoski, Senior Advisor for Steam Generators that attempts to help people understand a little more about steam generators. The blog post was titled Where There’s Steam, There’s … a Steam Generator. Aside: Many of my colleagues would immediately point to the title […]

Filed Under: Aging nuclear, Boiling Water, Economics, Politics of Nuclear Energy, Pressurized Water

Radiation probes indicate NO melt through at Fukushima Unit 1

October 13, 2012 By Rod Adams

BWR/6 Reactor Assembly

Tepco has recently released measurements that provide convincing evidence that virtually all of the corium in Fukushima Daiichi unit #1 remains safely stored inside an intact reactor pressure vessel. Despite all claims to the contrary, no substantial quantities of that material have melted through the pressure vessel to fall onto the concrete floor of the […]

Filed Under: Accidents, Boiling Water, International nuclear

The History of Light Water Reactor Market Dominance – Part 1

March 12, 2009 By Rod Adams

Every once in a while, I like to curl up with a good story that has villains, well meaning good guys, international intrigue, and perhaps even a moral. Sometimes those stories have happy endings, other times they leave you hanging and waiting for the next installment. I just finished such a book – Light Water: […]

Filed Under: Army Nuclear Program, Atomic history, Boiling Water, Pressurized Water

The Atomic Show #057 – Boiling Water Reactors

April 25, 2007 By Rod Adams 4 Comments

Shane and Rod discuss boiling water reactors, one of the two types of established light water reactors. There are two main types of light water reactors, pressurized water reactors (PWR) and boiling water reactors (BWR). They share some characteristics, but also have a number of differences. There are plenty of sources of information on the […]

Filed Under: Atomic history, Boiling Water, Podcast, Water Cooled Reactors

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • paul wick on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy