Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. This makes me wonder why nobody has e.g. fired a flare into the leak to burn it off and eliminate the invisible poisonous plume.

  2. @E-P

    I suspect the answer would be that the resulting explosion would do nothing to stop the leak and might have some unintended consequences.

    I’m not sure why some sort of conventional flaring device has not been installed to continually flare off the natural gas. That is what the oil and gas industry normally do when the often unusable stuff insists on coming out of the ground with no place to go.

  3. Thanks for the post and the videos, Rod. The infrared video is particularly interesting when I think about it. The methane plume is dark – because the methane is absorbing IR in the band that the camera is sensitive to. Like a leather car seat in the sun, it’s warming up and trapping heat in the atmosphere. A very clear demonstration of how effective methane is at trapping heat.

    Also, the well is in a natural gas storage field, not a field that’s producing new gas. Leakage from storage facilities is just as important as leakage from wells. The EIA web site gives a weekly report on natural gas, including how much is in storage at http://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/ . Just shy of 4 billion cubic feet in storage as of December 9.

  4. Porter Ranch abuts chapparrel covered hillsides, in the midst of a drought. Shooting a flare into the plume would make sense if you had an idiot manning the flare gun, and ya had a real grudge against sprawling heavily populated developmants.

Similar Posts

  • Health effects of radiation – items that caught my attention

    A friend shared a link to a prize winning essay titled The path to reconstruction in Fukushima as seen through fieldwork in Eastern Japan. It was written by Jun Takada, Doctor of Science Professor, Sapporo Medical University. Here is a sample quote: Following the nuclear accident in Fukushima that occurred as a result of the…

  • Romance of Radium – How did our relationship with radioactive material sour?

    Note – This post was initially published on February 23, 2013. After attending the ANS President’s Special Session about the way we should communicate about radiation, I thought it would be worth repeating. Sometimes, we need to look outside of our immediate time and place to find “best practices” that we should emulate. Hitting road…

  • Climate scientists propose radical solutions – including nuclear energy

    The best chance for humans to avert the worst risks of both accessible fossil fuel depletion and global climate change is for people who generally agree on those risks to begin working together to improve our ability to use nuclear energy. That will mean that both nuclear energy advocates and antinuclear environmentalists must recognize that…

  • Mr. Atomic Goes to New York for The Future of Energy – Part 1

    On April 4 and 5, I had the pleasure of attending the 9th annual The Future of Energy Summit organized by Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) and held at the Grand Hyatt next door to New York’s Grand Central Station. The organizing theme of this year’s event, The Age of Plenty, the Age of Competition…

  • Atomic Show #210 – Leadership by Navy nukes

    This show was inspired by a post on Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Healthiness titled Why I’m Not Afraid of Fukushima. That post was written by a guest blogger named Jeremiah Scott; he is an electrical engineering student who is attending college in the Pacific Northwest with the help of the GI bill. He…

  • James Hansen is worried about CO2 and realistic about solutions

    Dr. James Hansen is perhaps the world’s most famous and stubbornly insistent climate change activists. He bases his concerns on several decades worth of intensive research. During part of his career, he served as the director of a large laboratory at NASA Goddard Space Center, so it was not just his own research that he…