• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

In a turbulent electricity fuels market, nuclear fission fuels provides some price stability

September 8, 2008 By Rod Adams


One of the trends that has become obvious to the fuel traders in the electrical power business is that their job is quite a bit more “interesting” today than it was 5-10 years ago. Instead of being able to reliably contract for coal, residual oil or natural gas at stable prices or with moderate inflation escalation for 10 years at a time, the traders are finding rather wild price swings and few offers of long term contracts at rates even close to those in expiring contracts.

State regulators have taken notice and quietly begun to implement rules that allow more frequent adjustments in the electricity sales price. A new trend is the ability to recover projected costs in advance rather than waiting until the returns are in for previous years to build a rate case.

When fuel represents 60-90% of the cost of power generation – like it does in most fossil fuel powered plants – it is vitally important for the stability of the utility companies to be able to pass those rapidly changing costs on to consumers. The alternative is a California 2001 style financial crisis where utilities approach bankruptcy in a squeeze between their costs and their obligation to provide power at fixed prices. Unlike many businesses faced with increases in raw material costs, electric utilities are often legally obligated to continue selling their product, even at a loss.

In this turbulent fuel market, the 104 operating nuclear power plants in the US are providing a bit of stability. Not only are they being operated as much as possible, with average capacity factors exceeding 90% during most of the past 6 years, but the owners have been investing steadily to increase their ability to produce power. According to Tom Christopher, President and CEO of AREVA NP Inc. and CEO of AREVA, Inc., these power uprates can add as much as 130 MW of capacity to an existing nuclear plant.

Until reading Mr. Christopher’s article, I did not realize that there are even some state public utility commissions that are mandating uprate projects. Though he did not specifically say it, I presume that those mandates occur when the commission’s economic analysis indicates that the nuclear plant uprate is the lowest cost option for new capacity supply.

Though there is a lot of attention being paid to the rather astounding cost projections for new nuclear plants, what is less often discussed is the higher long-term risk of cost increases for other types of power projects. Even formerly predictable and “cheap” coal is getting some attention by some serious cost analysts who project that the rate risk could be huge for a new coal project in today’s market.

With nuclear power projects, many of the cost and schedule risks – though certainly not all – are within the control of the contracting customer. Once the project is up and running, fuel prices are rather low, and there is little risk of the later imposition of carbon emission taxes.

No wonder Tom Christopher believes: “By this time next year the industry will have some 50 designs and sites in the works.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience, now serving as a Managing Partner at Nucleation Capital, an emerging climate-focused fund. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial discussion and analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology and policies for several decades. He is the founder of Atomic Insights and host and producer of The Atomic Show Podcast.

Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • David on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Rod Adams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • paul wick on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy