Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. It does “cause a certain level of concern”. Lots of natural gas deposits are ‘sour’, ie: they contain significant amounts of hydrogen sulphide, which is highly toxic. Sour gas drilling is an extra hazard to those working on the drill rigs & those living nearby.

    Before sour goes to the user the H2S is removed & converted to elemental sulphur. Around here there are lots of gas plants with sulphur piles that grow when the price of sulphur is low & shrink when it’s high.

    There had been a proposal to drill some sour gas wells just outside of the city here, but the opposition from nearby residents seem to have killed it.

    Jim Baerg

    51° N 114° W

  2. Jim:

    Thank you for the information. I would imagine that drilling companies are pretty good at predicting whether or not a particular field is “sour”, but I would love to hear more. Something that would concern me as a nearby resident of a drilling project is the answer to the question – “how do you know” whether or not to take extra precautions? What kinds of measures need to be implemented to handle this kind of deposit safely? How reliable are they? What happens if they fail? How do we know that the people actually doing the drilling are following the right procedures? Who is the safety regulator?

    Finally, what happens if the price of natural gas is high enough to bring in the wildcatters and speculators? Does the situation change if there is a “boom” in the area with a drilling “frenzy”?

  3. Here in Alberta the industry is regulated fairly safely & the nearby residents get told about what’s happening. In places where the residents near the well have little political clout it’s likely they don’t. Here the regulation is mostly through the Alberta Energy & Utilities Board.

    Here workers on the rigs go through H2S safety courses, but I expect there is a problem during a boom with having inexperienced workers who don’t know all the proper proceedures.

  4. This string caught my attention, but still a little surprised there isn’t as many comments as I expected. I’ll keep checking back since this is a hot topic for me personally.

Similar Posts

  • Supporting podcast music power

    Though The Atomic Show does not play music – yet – I am a big fan of independence and the idea that artists do not benefit much from big music labels. One way to show the power of independent music artists is a promotion called Bum Rush The Charts. The idea is that podcast listeners…

  • More information about uranium minining

    As mentioned in a previous Atomic Show, the uranium market is full of speculators and get rich quick opportunists. The International Herald Tribune published a story on March 28, 2007 titled High price of uranium prods U.S. mines to life that gives some indications about the natural response from mining companies and independent explorers. A…

  • The Atomic Show #039 – Polonium uses plus coal mining hazards

    Rod Adams and Shane Brown discuss the properties of polonium. They move on to the hazards of mining and transporting coal. Polonium talk is all over the news media because of the recent poisoning death of Alexander Litvinenko, a former KGB agent living in the UK. The tale is one suitable for a John Le…

  • Time for a real nuclear debate

    Peter Campbell is an IT consultant and environmental campaigner (according to his Blogger profile). He blogs at Peter Campbell’s blog on the state of the planet. Yesterday (May 14, 2006) he told that world that “We need a real nuclear debate.” I agreed with him and posted a quick comment on his blog. I recommend…

  • The Atomic Show #029 – Nuclear power in space

    Space exploration applications of nuclear power Space exploration is critically dependent on energy sources that are long lasting and can operate in a vacuum. Nuclear power fits the bill, but there have always been objections that limited its applications. Objections notwithstanding there have also been a number of missions where the only real solution was…

  • The Atomic Show #022

    During episode number 22, Shane and I begin with a rant about people like George Monbiot, the author of a recent article titled Sure, nuclear power is safer than in the past – but we still don’t need it. Our big beef is that he accepts a fossil fuel industry supported notion that it is…