Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 Comments

  1. I am no expert but some thought about plausible DNA repair suggests that dose rate is the important factor, not total dose. Since everything in molecular biology is always more complex than first imagined, I suppose total dose might eventually matter as well.

    Still, I suspect that success of DNA repair is primarily dependent upon low enough dose rate.

  2. Logically, it also leads to questioning whether “lifetime dose” has any useful meaning.

  3. I live in Pasco and would have loved to attend!!! Had no idea…..and I WORK at a Nuclear Power Plant. Of course I was on duty Saturday-Tuesday, but I would have looked into taking time off to attend.

    We are having a INPO and WANO visit right now and its JUST as terrible as it sounds. Cant believe the Nuclear Power Industry has allowed these morons to gain this much power and influence. Not one single plant has the balls to put them in their place.

Similar Posts

  • A Report on the RSH Symposium on the Medical Benefits of Low Dose Radiation

    Reprinted with permission of the author by Dr. Jerry Cuttler, Cuttler and Associates A symposium on this subject was held in Washington, November 15, near the ANS/ENS Winter Meeting. It was sponsored by Radiation, Science and Health (RSH), an international non-profit organization, and the Center for Nuclear Technology and Society at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI),…

  • Challenging New York Academy of Sciences to repudiate “Chernobyl Consequences”

    On the 25th anniversary of the explosion that destroyed unit 4 of the Chernobyl nuclear power station, Ralph Nader published a commentary in which he strongly supported the book titled Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. As part of his opinion piece, he made the following statement: “Dr. Yablokov, you are…

  • You’ve been told lies. Low dose radiation isn’t harmful. It can improve health

    Biological Theory has published the equivalent of a “bunker buster” salvo in a decades-long war of words between scientists. On one side are people who believe that there is no safe dose of radiation. They assert that radiation protection regulations should continue using a linear, no threshold model. The other side includes those who say…

  • Radiation health effects for medical doctors

    Misinformation about radiation health effects does not just affect the nuclear industry and dramatically increase the costs associated with all nuclear energy technologies. It is also having a deleterious effect on the beneficial use of radiation and radioactive materials in medical diagnosis and treatment. Throughout their training programs, medical doctors have been taught to do…

  • Atomic Show #267 – Dr. Lauren Jackson addresses radiophobia

    A couple of weeks ago, I heard Dr. (Isabel) Lauren Jackson talking to Bill Nye on his Science Rules podcast. At the end of his discussion with her, Nye seemed to have changed his mind in the positive direction regarding the importance of nuclear energy. He seemed far less worried about radiation and the potential…

  • Don’t allow EPA to use “modernize” as euphemism for “tighten”

    On February 3, 2014, The Hill Ballot Box blog published a call to action for nuclear energy and medical radiation therapy professionals titled EPA seeks to modernize nuclear standards. The EPA says it has not changed its radiation protection standards since the 1970s. Radiation health researchers would probably agree that there is a need to…