12 Comments

  1. Good luck and best wishes for this! The shame of it is you have there a state that’s tipping over with stars and celebs who endorse anything under the moon but you’re hard put to scrape any up for the nuclear cause. Says it all.

  2. Has there been any response by “Nuclear Matters”? Seems as though Big Names like Former Senators and Governors like Evan Bayh and Judd Gregg and former EPA Director Carol Browner, all of whom reside on the board of “Nuclear Matters” could demonstrate their resolve by participating.

  3. @Rod
    You need to look back at why Zion was shut down. Scuttlebut in the industry was that they could sell electricity for more without that base load available. Zion’s owner is/was Com-Ed – an Exelon company [and now operator in reality of Ft. Calhoun NPP which is shutting down].
    in the 90’s, before OPPD decided to build Nebraska City II, OPPD was building CCTG like daisies. At one management meeting I asked the wisdom building so many of these facilities with power prices of over $0.50 /kWh, how can you afford the cost of these facilities? I was told “Just one hot spell in the summer will pay for the facility.” I am no expert on pricing, economics, etc., but it seems to me that Senior Executives with NPPs have decided that, like Com-Ed & Zion, they will be on firmer pricing ground with less Nuclear Power. Just like TMI got low-balled on their auction for power, others feel the same pinch. Get rid of a few plants and the contract price will go up.
    Again, if CO2 is really causing Global Warming this will go down as the USA’s biggest mistake in a century. Time will show that Renewables backed up with NG and all of its problems, including the methane leakage and wellhead flare offs where it is un economical to build a pipe line, like is happening now is going to result in More CO2 than coal. Remember it takes two pipelines from an oil field to get both oil and methane. Until the second one is built it is flared off. If the pipeline costs more that the projected NG recovery prediction – it will not even be proposed.
    And the Envirowhacos are happy because they will get more wind turbines. And we get higher Electricity prices, forcing the reduction in use of Heat Pumps, possibly even geothermal HPs, and increased use of NG and Higher NG prices. And the cycle starts over.

  4. A belated apology to Rod. Until I heard second-hand I had no ideal Atomic Insights had a GUI change because I primarily use Lynx with Mint Rosa on my warhorse Thinkpad R60 which doesn’t steal horsepower on graphics. On backup Opera the new look looks really sleek, but I lament the absence of the handy site topic index strip on the left side. Otherwise looks fine!

    ========================

    To this topic, maybe it might be helpful to erect an “Endangered NPPs” blog as a single watering hole for all those affected by NPP closings to share info and intelligence and brainstorm solutions and otherwise commiserate by.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  5. I primarily use Lynx with Mint Rosa on my warhorse Thinkpad R60

    In other words, you’re a real man. I’m impressed!

    Rod – You should consider branding your blog as “Lynx friendly.”

  6. I know I don’t live in the USA, but Mothers for Nuclear have inspired me to donate and support the upcoming March for Hope. Here’s where you can donate too:
    https://secure.squarespace.com/commerce/donate?donatePageId=5716925a7da24f8e4c29df77

    Why not cheer ourselves up by thinking up some good slogans for the campaign? Some that spring to mind are:

    “We’re proud of our clean energy!”

    “Our MOTHERS are PROUD of our power station”

    “Happy to SLEEP with our nuclear waste”

    “Stop the FOEs of our CLEAN ENERGY!”

    “Diablo Canyon: 20g CO2 per kWh
    Natural Gas: 400g CO2 per kWh”

    “Natural gas is DIRTY”

    “Aliso Canyon: DIRTY
    Diablo Canyon: CLEAN”

    Diablo Canyon –
    The MORE you KNOW
    the LESS you FEAR!

    We LOVE
    our ENVIRONMENT!
    We LOVE DC!

    NATURAL GAS
    is
    CLIMATE DISASTER!

    DIABLO CANYON
    POWER
    when the
    SUN goes DOWN

    DIABLO CANYON
    is 18 times
    BETTER than IVANPAH

    HATE CO2
    LOVE DIABLO CANYON

    Who’s got some more?

    Simon

  7. Good idea, but instead of run-of-the-mill cute sounding signs, how about hard-hitting edu-signs the media and fossils REALLY won’t like:

    Total NPP deaths over 60 years worldwide: 80
    Total Oil/Gas deaths over 60 years worldwide: 30,000+

    Natural Gas IS a Greenhouse Gas = Global Warming.
    NPPs emit No Greenhouse Gas = Fresh Air and Dry Coastal Cities!

    Canadian Asthma Society Supports Nuclear. Hospitals Support Clean Pollution-less Nuclear

    Nuclear Waste Is A Waste of Time. We Long Knew How To Do IT!

    Every NPP-Closing Anti-Nuker Is Responsible For Three Respiratory Deaths a Year

    NPPs Won’t Clutter Your Vistas With Monster Pinwheels

    Greenpeace And FOE Won’t Debate With Nuclear Pros. Ask Why!!

    Chernobyl Killed Less Than Major Oil and Gas and Coal Accidents
    Fukushima Had Three RARE Meltdowns. No Doomsdays. No Deaths.

    A Happy Forest Blooms in Chernobyl, Not A Radioactive Desert.
    Is Nagasaki and Hiroshima A Radioactive Forbidden Zone?

    Save Oil And Coal To Make Things From, Not Go Up In Smoke!

    If You’re Fair, Ask Oil and Gas To Seal Up All Their Waste Like Nuclear Always Does!

    Just seed ideas for starters… Good Luck!

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

  8. Thanks James. I think we really need both sorts of sign. Short punchy slogans are best while demonstrating or on the march: onlookers need to decipher things easily. Longer thinking-hooks work well on handouts and poster displays.

    BTW, Mothers For Nuclear remind us that Governor Brown is a key person. So obviously some slogans need to be aimed at him. I dunno, something like:

    DO THE RIGHT THING
    GOVERNOR BROWN

    SAVE US FROM THE ECO-BULLIES
    GOVERNOR BROWN

    SAVE OUR CLEAN POWER
    GOVERNOR BROWN

    And what sort of slogans can folks come up with for PG&E ?? Stuff about not betraying our children would seem to be relevant…

  9. Good quotes. Impact tells a full story. The marchers just need to get bigger signs. This is the last chance to shake up the unwashed on the tube.

  10. Take it or leave it, but I think it highly behooves the marchers and organizers to “embed” or have someone VERY literate and knowledgeable on nuclear energy stick close by the reporters throughout the march to field and “enhance” any replies from marchers that they might throw off-the-cuff questions at. Just a gut recommendation to help prevent any silly or unknowledgeable marcher replies from being a crippling news byte. Can’t hurt at this stage of the game.

    James Greenidge
    Queens NY

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • There are three Superfuels – uranium, thorium and plutonium

    Meredith Angwin, who blogs at Yes Vermont Yankee, published a book review post titled Superfuel: A Book I Wanted to Love. The book is a tribute to thorium and the people that Richard Martin refers to as “thorium-heads”. The villains in the book are the people that Martin calls “nuclearati” – otherwise known as the…

  • Why might PG&E decide to destroy Diablo Canyon when it’s almost paid off?

    BY: William Rodgers “Why would PG&E decide to destroy Diablo Canyon during its (I would think) period of highest ROI?” Because they can “earn” a higher ROI by switching to natural gas-fueled power plants that are supplemented by federally subsidized wind and solar. The stockholders will earn a guaranteed return on subsidized wind and solar….

  • Pronuclear environmentalists present to 100 curious citizens in Walkerville, SA

    I am running a little late this morning, so I do not have a new post for you. Instead, I would like to recommend that you spend a few minutes reading Walking the talk- pro-nuclear advocates stand together at Ben Heard’s Decarbonise SA. It is an important report about an event where four pronuclear environmentalists…

  • Reminder: NRC Diablo Canyon relicensing public meeting Aug 5

    Please remember that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is hosting two public meetings on August 5 in San Luis Obispo to provide an update on its review of Pacific Gas & Electric’s application to relicense the Diablo Canyon nuclear power station. That application was filed in November 2009. Here are the meeting details from the NRC…

  • Atomic Show #260 – Pro-nuclear voices from COP23 in Bonn. Not a warm welcome

    This episode of the Atomic Show is a conversation among five clean energy advocates who attended the COP with the goal of sharing what they know about the ways that nuclear energy can help reduce global emissions while also providing a growing amount of reliable power. With more power, more people will have a pathway…

  • NRC believes 1-2 year grid collapse in USA is credible scenario

    On December 18, 2012, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a notice in the Federal Register (74788-74798 vol, 77, No. 243) announcing that it would consider in the rulemaking process the issues raised in a petition (Docket No. PRM-50-96: NRC-2011-0069) asserting that existing regulations for civilian nuclear power facilities are inadequate to assure…