• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • About
  • Podcast
  • Archives

Atomic Insights

Atomic energy technology, politics, and perceptions from a nuclear energy insider who served as a US nuclear submarine engineer officer

Atomic Show #190 – Nuclear plant performance during Hurricane Sandy

November 7, 2012 By Rod Adams

There are 34 nuclear reactors located in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy. Of those, 7 were shutdown for planned maintenance. Three units tripped due to disturbances on the grid or issues with one of their redundant cooling systems. The other 24 remained operational and supplied as much power as the grid could accept.

On Sunday, November 4, I gathered a group of pronuclear communicators, each with their own blog, to talk about the technology’s resilience and about how a certain segment of the antinuclear industry loves to spread scary what if stories. Every time nature tests our nuclear power plants and they perform well, the anti’s tell us that “we almost lost (fill in the blank)”. Then they point to an event like Fukushima and tell us that proves that nature can throw more at nuclear plants than they can handle.

What they fail to admit, however, is that even a very bad event that destroys three formerly productive nuclear power units at an admittedly vulnerable site with insufficient preventive measures did not result in a single human injury any worse than a mild sunburn from exposure to radiation.

As amateur pro nuclear communicators, we have all chosen a rather unusual hobby; we continue to spread the truth about nuclear energy and continue to explain to people that it really does have the power to save the world from many of its most pressing challenges.

Guests on this show include:

Margaret Harding, who blogs at 4 Factor Consulting
Meredith Angwin, who blogs at Yes Vermont Yankee and ANS Nuclear Cafe
Will Davis, who blogs at Atomic Power Review and ANS Nuclear Cafe

Additional Reading

Spent Fuel Pool at Oyster Creek

Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Arkansas and Hurricane Sandy

Hurricanes and Nuclear Plants in the Main Stream Media

http://s3.amazonaws.com/AtomicShowFiles/atomic_20121105_190.mp3

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:16:57 — 35.4MB)

Subscribe: Google Podcasts | RSS

Filed Under: Atomic Advocacy, Natural disasters, Nuclear Communications, Podcast

About Rod Adams

Rod Adams is Managing Partner of Nucleation Capital, a venture fund that invests in advanced nuclear, which provides affordable access to this clean energy sector to pronuclear and impact investors. Rod, a former submarine Engineer Officer and founder of Adams Atomic Engines, Inc., which was one of the earliest advanced nuclear ventures, is an atomic energy expert with small nuclear plant operating and design experience. He has engaged in technical, strategic, political, historic and financial analysis of the nuclear industry, its technology, regulation, and policies for several decades through Atomic Insights, both as its primary blogger and as host of The Atomic Show Podcast. Please click here to subscribe to the Atomic Show RSS feed. To join Rod's pronuclear network and receive his occasional newsletter, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pete51 says

    November 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM

    I look forward to downloading and listening to the podcast. Margaret, Meredith, Will and Rod are sure to make for a good conversation.

    Regarding nuclear plant safety…Even though Fukushima didn’t result in any deaths, the damage to the plants and the radioactive contamination to the land around them makes for a good argument that inherently safe plants need to be developed which do not need emergency AC sources of power. Therefore, the following piece of news is somewhat disappointing. The Dept. of Energy is stopping its funding of SMR R&D at the Savannah River Site.

    http://www.aikenstandard.com/article/20121107/AIK0101/121109642/small-reactor-work-at-srs-put-on-hold

    • Joris van Dorp says

      November 7, 2012 at 5:49 PM

      This is bad news. And just when I thought that the USA was actually rather better than I feared on the stimulation of nuclear technology development. Or is that overstatement?

      • Daniel says

        November 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM

        @ Joris,

        There is plenty of capital to finance SMR R&D around the world. The US, Russia, China, France, South Korea are all in on it.

        The DOE financing is not an issue to me.

      • John Englert says

        November 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM

        @Joris,

        The DOE needs to stop pretending that it is the “Energy” department and come to terms with it being the nuclear weapon and national security department.

  2. Pete51 says

    November 7, 2012 at 7:43 PM

    Joris- The article I linked to only mentions the program at the Savannah River Site. There is a separate SMR project in the works involving B&W and TVA. I’m sure Rod could provide more details on the current status. Below is a link to a rather long article. Page 4 discusses the TVA memorandum of understanding with B&W and the NRC licensing path.
    http://www.powermag.com/nuclear/Small-Is-the-New-Big-The-B-and-W-Small-Modular-Reactor_4821_p4.html

  3. jaagu says

    November 11, 2012 at 1:33 AM

    “… a very bad event that destroys three formerly productive nuclear power units at an admittedly vulnerable site with insufficient preventive measures did not result in a single human injury any worse than a mild sunburn from exposure to radiation.”

    Your statement above misses a large part of what is wrong with nuclear power. The Fukushima accident is not just a sunburn as you imply:

    Expensive accident: >$500 billion
    Thousands of people evacuated from there homes: >100,000 people
    Thousands of businesses destroyed
    Huge area of Fukushima area land contaminated for years
    Japan was lucky the wind was blowing out to the ocean most of the time
    Japan was lucky that the radioactive liquids spilled into the deep ocean

    the

  4. David says

    November 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM

    Ok, I have been shooting off my mouth about the ability of plants to Load follow and why that would make the LFTR a much better choice. I found out that ALL Nukes can load follow but that the NRC does not want the grid operators to directly control the Power output of a Nuke. Suddenly using a Molten Salt heat storage as the interface to the steam plants makes HUGE sense to me.

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Join Rod’s pronuclear network

Join Rod's pronuclear network by completing this form. Let us know what your specific interests are.

Recent Comments

  • Roger Clifton on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Chris Aoki on Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C
  • Michael Scarangella on Catching Oklo — a rising star!
  • Gary Nicholls on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked
  • Jon Grams on Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Follow Atomic Insights

The Atomic Show

Atomic Insights

Recent Posts

Atomic Show #297 – Krusty – The Kilopower reactor that worked

Nuclear energy growth prospects and secure uranium supplies

Nucleation Capital’s Earth Day in Atherton

Atomic Show #296 – Julia Pyke, Director of Finance Sizewell C

Solar’s dirty secrets: How solar power hurts people and the planet

  • Home
  • About Atomic Insights
  • Atomic Show
  • Contact
  • Links

Search Atomic Insights

Archives

Copyright © 2022 · Atomic Insights

Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy