2 Comments

  1. Hi Rod.
    I am in the process of establishing a non-profit Public Art organization regarding a transformation of the negative imagery surrounding the nuclear industry. I am an artist (and daughter of a nuke) and feel the need to address what I feel is the missing link in the “nuclear revolution.”
    I am creating new, inviting and positive imagery for my generation in order to displace the residual fear of past problems (particularly the Homer Simpson stereotype, which is sadly the primary cultural reference of the nuclear industry for most young people!).
    I just want to invite you to check out my website and was wondering if you can offer any advise in terms of networking with industry folks who might be able to get behind a public art project.
    http://www.popatomic.org
    I greatly appreciate the work that you do and hope that you find my concept helpful to the cause.
    best,
    Suzy

  2. Whoa! I knew I was in an august crowd on the podcast that night. But I didn’t realize I was qualified through the perception that I’m an active nuclear blogger… I’m afraid that’s a stretch, I’m sorry to say. I have several inactive blogs that are personal, and naturally I’m a fan of nuclear energy.
    Whew! Maybe someday I can put all the pieces together and get back to living up to my reputation…
    Thanks always for the vote of confidence, and the encouragement. I was honored to participate – I just didn’t realize what an honor it was!
    Thanks again, Rod!
    Kelly

Comments are closed.

Similar Posts

  • Flush With Cash – Where Did Climate Activists Get So Much Money?

    The Economist recently published a column titled Climate politics: Flush with cash. So what? that described the results of a recent study by Matthew Nisbet, an researcher at American University in Washington, DC. According to Nisbet, groups classified in the environmental category spent almost $400 million on climate change and energy issues in 2009. The…

  • Oak Ridge researchers prove Fukushima Unit 4 spent fuel pool NEVER a danger

    The temperature in the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 spent fuel pool never exceeded 90 degrees C and the level in the pool never fell below the top of the used fuel that was stored there. The Chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the people who supported his testimony to Congress on the afternoon…

  • The battle for the atom is heating up again

    Yesterday, I pointed Atomic Insights readers to a series of articles that provide an overview of the history of the antinuclear movement. In addition to recently reading those articles, I have been rereading a 1982 book by Bertrand Goldschmidt titled “The Atomic Complex: A Worldwide Political History of Nuclear Energy.” The two self-assigned homework projects…

  • Existing nuclear plants are valuable and worth saving

    Many currently operating nuclear plants are in danger of being permanently shut down due to temporary conditions including low, but volatile natural gas prices, improperly designed markets that fail to recognize the value of reliable generating capacity, quotas and mandates that result in certain types of electrical generators receiving direct monetary payments in addition to…